After the end of World War II, there were plans to demolish the monument, although little written evidence is available to historians and research is largely based on oral testimony. According to her son, she took part in a meeting where the fate of the monument was discussed, at which her opinion, as reported by her son, was that the monument was of very high artistic value and that its demolition might hurt the most sacred feelings of the Latvian people. Over time the misinterpretation of symbolism also was toned down and by 1988 the monument was said, with somewhat more accuracy, to have been built to
"celebrate the liberation from bondage of the autocracy of the tsar and German barons", although withholding the fact that the
Bolshevik Red Army and the
Red Latvian Riflemen were also adversaries in the
Latvian War of Independence. In response the Soviet government organized a bicycle race at the monument at the time when the ceremony was planned to take place. Helsinki-86 organized another flower-laying ceremony on August 23 in the same year to commemorate the anniversary of the
Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, at which
the crowd was dispersed using jets of water. Yet the independence movement grew in size, amounting in some events to more than half a million participants (about one quarter of Latvia's population) and three years later, on 4 May 1990, the re-establishment of the independence of Latvia was declared. traditionally take place at the Freedom Monument Since the re-establishment of independence the monument has become a focal point for a variety of events. One of these – on March 16, the
commemoration day of veterans of the
Latvian Legion of the
Waffen-SS, who fought the
Soviet Union during World War II – has caused controversy. The date was first celebrated by Latvians in exile before being brought to Latvia in 1990 and for a short time (1998–2000) was the official remembrance day. In 1998 the event drew the attention of the foreign mass media and in the following year the
Russian government condemned the event as a "glorification of
Nazism". The event evolved into a political conflict between Latvians and Russians, posing a threat to public safety. The Latvian government took a number of steps in order to try to bring the situation under control, and in 2006 not only were the events planned by right wing organizations not approved, but the monument was fenced off, according to an announcement by
Riga city council, for restoration. Therefore, the government was criticized by the Latvian press for being unable to ensure public safety and freedom of speech. The unapproved events took place despite the ban. On November 23, 2006, the law requiring the approval of the authorities for public gatherings was ruled
unconstitutional. In the future years the government mobilized the police force to guard the neighborhood of the monument and the events were relatively peaceful. ==See also==