(Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Portugal, Spain, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom) on the future status of Russia and other former Soviet Republics was published on 23 December 1991, according to which "The
European Community and its Member States have noted with satisfaction the decision of the participants at the
Alma Ata meeting on 21 December 1991 to establish a
Commonwealth of Independent States. They note that the international rights and obligations of the former USSR, including those arising from the
Charter of the United Nations, will continue to be exercised by Russia. They note with satisfaction the acceptance by the
Russian Government of these commitments and responsibilities and will continue to deal with Russia on this basis, taking into account the change in its constitutional status." Self-determination is a cardinal principle in modern international law but no
right to secession is recognized under international law. The "Guidelines on the Recognition of New States in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union", adopted by Ministers of the EC (Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Portugal, Spain, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom) on 16 December 1991. According to a scientific paper: "EC Guidelines on the Recognition of New States in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union approved in December 1991 constituted a remarkable innovation in European policy-making." On 21 December 1991, the Council of Heads of State decided that the member states of the Commonwealth, referring to Article 12 of the Agreement on the Establishment of the Commonwealth of Independent States, based on the intention of each state to fulfill obligations under the UN Charter and participate in the work of this organization as full members, taking into account that the original members of the UN were the Republic of Belarus, the USSR and Ukraine, expressing satisfaction that the Republic of Belarus and Ukraine continue to participate in the UN as sovereign independent states, decided that "the Commonwealth States support Russia in continuing the membership of the USSR in the UN, including permanent membership in the Security Council, and other international organizations." The document entered into force for 11 countries on December 21. On 23 December 1991 this appears in print in the
New York Times: "Member states of the commonwealth support Russia in taking over the U.S.S.R. membership in the U.N., including permanent membership in the Security Council and other international organizations." The Declaration of the Twelve on the future status of Russia and other former Soviet Republics was published on 23 December 1991, according to which "The
European Community and its Member States have noted with satisfaction the decision of the participants at the Alma Ata meeting on 21 December 1991 to establish a Commonwealth of Independent States. They note that the international rights and obligations of the former USSR, including those arising from the Charter of the United Nations, will continue to be exercised by Russia. They note with satisfaction the acceptance by the Russian Government of these commitments and responsibilities and will continue to deal with Russia on this basis, taking into account the change in its constitutional status. They are prepared to recognise the other Republics constituting the Community as soon as they receive assurances from those Republics that they are prepared to fulfil the requirements set out in the "Guidelines on the Recognition of New States in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union", adopted by Ministers on 16 December 1991. They expect, in particular, that those Republics will give them assurances that they will fulfil their international obligations arising from treaties and agreements concluded by the Soviet Union, including the ratification and implementation of the CFE Treaty by the Republics to which it applies, and that they will establish a single control over nuclear weapons and their non-proliferation."
UN membership On 23 December Russia officially received the USSR's seat on the UN Security Council. The international community recognized it as continuator state to the Soviet Union. The
Gudok newspaper notes that Yeltsin's letter was sent by the secretary-general to all UN members with a note that this appeal is of a notification nature, stating reality, and does not require formal approval by the UN. All permanent members of the UN Security Council and other leading countries agreed with this approach. By a note of 3 January 1992, the Russian Foreign Ministry appealed to the heads of diplomatic missions in Moscow with a proposal to consider consular and diplomatic missions of the USSR in foreign countries as representatives of Russia. By a note of 13 January 1992, the heads of foreign diplomatic missions were notified that the Russian Federation continued to exercise the rights and fulfil the obligations arising from international treaties concluded by the USSR, with a request to consider Russia as a party to all existing international treaties instead of the USSR. The UN website lists Russia as a member of the United Nations as follows: "The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics was an original Member of the United Nations from 24 October 1945. In a letter dated 24 December 1991, Boris Yeltsin, the President of the Russian Federation, informed the Secretary-General that the membership of the Soviet Union in the Security Council and all other United Nations organs was being continued by the Russian Federation with the support of the 11 member countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States." In an interview with
Nezavisimaya Gazeta on 1 April 1992, Foreign Minister
Andrei Kozyrev explained the situation: “Many people think that Russia became the legal successor of the USSR automatically, but this is far from being the case. We faced a very difficult political and diplomatic task. Russia is not a legal successor, but a continuing state of the USSR. The successor states are in fact all the former republics of the Soviet Union, but it is Russia that is the continuator.” More than 30 years later on 10 January 2025 Kozyrev reconfirmed that Russia is the continuator of the USSR, and all 12 countries are the successors of the USSR. There was no automaticity. It was an open question. The solution was suggested to us by Western countries, especially by the British, who had a huge experience in solving inheritance issues, they had an empire. The British dug somewhere in their archives and proposed a variant of a successor state. There is a monstrous confusion even among historians who write about it and political analysts. It is simply an unwillingness to understand. So, all of them are legal successors. All Union republics. The three Baltic republics refused to be successors. All the others, Georgia, Armenia, Kazakhstan were legal successors and now remain legal successors. In relation to foreign debt, it was a deal. With respect to the UN Security Council, an international conference of all successors under international law had to be convened to resolve the issues. Therefore, a continuator was invented. A continuator is one of the inheritors, one of the legal successors, whom everybody recognises, but it doesn't require ratification. It is simply a declaration that it is recognised as a continuing state of the legal function that is written in the UN Charter for the USSR and now for Russia. It was a manoeuvre. The republics agreed. The other 4 permanent members of the UNSC agreed. If someone disagreed, raised their hand and said ‘Where is the Soviet Union? Yesterday the Soviet Union was sitting here, and now someone under the sign of the Russian Federation. What is this?', it would have failed. There was a unique moment when the decision could have been challenged easily. But now it is an irrevocable decision and it is impossible to challenge it. In an interview with the
UN Radio, Ambassador
Yuli Vorontsov described: Our cooperation with the leading Western countries and, first of all, with the United States has worked out well. American lawyers gave us a very good legal option, which made the disputes about what belongs to the Russian Federation and what does not belong to it pointless. They suggested that our application to change the name of the country should say, as we said at the time, that the Russian Federation was the continuator of the Soviet Union. That word “ continuator” helped out a lot. A continuator means that Russia continues to have a seat on the Security Council. The other countries, the former Soviet republics, were newly independent states. They could not be continuators. The Secretary General was given a message from President Yeltsin. This message said that we, the Russian Federation, being the continuator of the Soviet Union in the United Nations, notify you that the name of the country will now be different - the Russian Federation. In fact, the whole process outwardly looked like a simple change of the sign at the table of delegations in the General Assembly and the Security Council. Instead of the nameplate 'Soviet Union' the name 'Russian Federation' appeared. and already on 31 December as the representative of the Russian Federation. On 31 January 1992,
John Major, chairman of the Security Council and
British Prime Minister, said to Yeltsin personally, who was attending a Security Council meeting: “Mr, President, thank you, I know the Council would wish me to welcome Russia as a permanent member of our Council. You are very welcome indeed.” Yeltsin in 1993 signed a decree "In order to legally secure the state property of the Russian Federation abroad and in connection with the signing of the Agreement on the distribution of all property of the former USSR abroad of 6 July 1992, I hereby decree: The Russian Federation, as a continuing state of the Union of the SSR, assumes all rights to the immovable and movable property of the former USSR located abroad, as well as the fulfilment of all obligations related to the use of this property." According to the letter of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation dated 16 January 2012 N 07-1407: From the point of view of international law, the geopolitical transformations of 1991 did not lead to the disappearance of the USSR as a subject of international law. Despite the changes in territory, length of borders, size of population, etc., the state called ‘USSR’ did not cease to exist, but continued its international legal personality under the name of ‘Russian Federation’. The term ‘continuity’ is used in international law to denote this kind of phenomenon. A State continuing under a new name to fulfil international rights and obligations in respect of the relevant territory, population, property, etc., is called a ‘continuing State’. In terms of its legal consequences, the situation of continuation is fundamentally different from that of succession. Whereas in the case of succession, international rights and obligations are transferred by an expression of will from one State (‘predecessor State’) to another (‘successor State’), that is, from one subject of international law to another, in the case of continuation, their exercise is automatically continued by the same State, a subject of international law, but with a different name. The approval of a State as a continuing or successor State depends not only on its own will, but also on the recognition of the relevant status by the international community. The status of the Russian Federation as a continuation State of the USSR has been officially or quietly recognised by the international community as a whole and by virtually all States individually. The statement of Russian continuity is contained, for example, in the Russian-German statement of 21 November 1991, the joint declaration of the Russian Federation and the United Kingdom of 1992, and the official statements of the governments of Belgium and Sweden. In the joint statement of 23 December 1991, the EC Member States acknowledged that ‘the international rights and obligations of the former USSR, including rights and obligations under the UN Charter, will continue to be exercised by Russia’. The EC Member States welcomed the Russian Government's agreement to assume such obligations and responsibilities and declared that as such they would continue their friendly relations with our country, taking into account the change in its constitutional status. Russia's status as a continuation state of the USSR is stated in many international treaties concluded by our country after 1991, including agreements on the inventory of the treaty and legal framework between Russia and foreign states (for example, intergovernmental protocols with Romania, Macedonia, Cyprus, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Denmark, Greece, Hungary). The Treaty between the Russian Federation and the Kingdom of Belgium on Consent and Cooperation of 8 December 1993, the Treaty between Russia and France of 7 February 1992, the Agreement between the Government of the Russian Federation and the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany on Cultural Cooperation of 16 December 1992, the Agreement between the Government of the Russian Federation and the European Space Agency on the Establishment of the Permanent Mission of the Agency in the Russian Federation of 10 April 1995, and others. The recognition of the status of a continuing state of the USSR was also reflected in Russia's continuation of the Soviet Union's membership in international organisations. == Nuclear weapons ==