Miller–Urey experiment

Foundations of organic synthesis and the origin of life Until the 19th century, there was considerable acceptance of the theory of spontaneous generation, the idea that "lower" animals, such as insects or rodents, arose from decaying matter. However, several experiments in the 19th century – particularly Louis Pasteur's swan neck flask experiment in 1859 — disproved the theory that life arose from decaying matter. Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species that same year, describing the mechanism of biological evolution. While Darwin never publicly wrote about the first organism in his theory of evolution, in a letter to Joseph Dalton Hooker, he speculated:But if (and oh what a big if) we could conceive in some warm little pond with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, light, heat, electricity etcetera present, that a protein compound was chemically formed, ready to undergo still more complex changes [...]" At this point, it was known that organic molecules could be formed from inorganic starting materials, as Friedrich Wöhler had described the Wöhler synthesis of urea from ammonium cyanate in 1828. Several other early seminal works in the field of organic synthesis followed, including Alexander Butlerov's synthesis of sugars from formaldehyde and Adolph Strecker's synthesis of the amino acid alanine from acetaldehyde, ammonia, and hydrogen cyanide. In 1913, Walther Löb synthesized amino acids by exposing formamide to silent electric discharge, so scientists were beginning to produce the building blocks of life from simpler molecules, but these were not intended to simulate any prebiotic scheme or even considered relevant to origin of life questions. In 1903, physicist Svante Arrhenius hypothesized that the first microscopic forms of life, driven by the radiation pressure of stars, could have arrived on Earth from space in the panspermia hypothesis. In the 1920s, Leonard Troland wrote about a primordial enzyme that could have formed by chance in the primitive ocean and catalyzed reactions, and Hermann J. Muller suggested that the formation of a gene with catalytic and autoreplicative properties could have set evolution in motion. Around the same time, Alexander Oparin's and J. B. S. Haldane's "Primordial soup" ideas were emerging, which hypothesized that a chemically-reducing atmosphere on early Earth would have been conducive to organic synthesis in the presence of sunlight or lightning, gradually concentrating the ocean with random organic molecules until life emerged. In this way, frameworks for the origin of life were coming together, but at the mid-20th century, hypotheses lacked direct experimental evidence. Stanley Miller and Harold Urey At the time of the Miller–Urey experiment, Harold Urey was a Professor of Chemistry at the University of Chicago who had a well-renowned career, including receiving the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1934 for his isolation of deuterium and leading efforts to use gaseous diffusion for uranium isotope enrichment in support of the Manhattan Project. In 1952, Urey postulated that the high temperatures and energies associated with large impacts in Earth's early history would have provided an atmosphere of methane (CH4), water (H2O), ammonia (NH3), and hydrogen (H2), creating the reducing environment necessary for the Oparin-Haldane "primordial soup" scenario. Stanley Miller arrived at the University of Chicago in 1951 to pursue a PhD under nuclear physicist Edward Teller, another prominent figure in the Manhattan Project. Miller began to work on how different chemical elements were formed in the early universe, but, after a year of minimal progress, Teller was to leave for California to establish Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and further nuclear weapons research. Urey refused to be listed on the manuscript because he believed his status would cause others to underappreciate Miller's role in designing and conducting the experiment and so encouraged Miller to take full credit for the work. Despite this the set-up is still most commonly referred to including both their names. After not hearing from Science for a few weeks, a furious Urey wrote to the editorial board demanding an answer, stating, "If Science does not wish to publish this promptly we will send it to the Journal of the American Chemical Society." Miller's manuscript was eventually published in Science in May 1953. == Experiment ==

In the original 1952 experiment, methane (CH4), ammonia (NH3), and hydrogen (H2) were all sealed together in a 2:2:1 ratio (1 part H2) inside a sterile 5-L glass flask connected to a 500-mL flask half-full of water (H2O). The gas chamber was intended to represent Earth's prebiotic atmosphere, while the water simulated an ocean. The water in the smaller flask was boiled such that water vapor entered the gas chamber and mixed with the "atmosphere". A continuous electrical spark was discharged between a pair of electrodes in the larger flask. The spark passed through the mixture of gases and water vapor, simulating lightning. A condenser below the gas chamber allowed aqueous solution to accumulate into a U-shaped trap at the bottom of the apparatus, which was sampled. After a day, the solution that had collected at the trap was pink, and after a week of continuous operation the solution was deep red and turbid, which Miller attributed to organic matter absorbed onto colloidal silica. , the apparatus used to conduct the experiment was on display at the Denver Museum of Nature and Science. ==Chemistry of experiment==

In 1957 Miller published research describing the chemical processes occurring inside his experiment. Hydrogen cyanide (HCN) and aldehydes (e.g., formaldehyde) were demonstrated to form as intermediates early on in the experiment due to the electric discharge. Similarly, aldehydes can be generated in the atmosphere from radicals resulting from CH4 and H2O decomposition and other intermediates like methanol. Several energy sources in planetary atmospheres can induce these dissociation reactions and subsequent hydrogen cyanide or aldehyde formation, including lightning, ultraviolet light, For example, here is a set photochemical reactions of species in the Miller–Urey atmosphere that can result in formaldehyde: : CH4 + OH → CH3 + HOH : CH3 + OH → CH3OH : CH3OH + hv → CH2O (formaldehyde) + H2 (top) and Strecker (bottom) schemes for synthesis of hydroxy acids and amino acids, respectively. B) Concentrations of ammonia, aldehydes, hydrogen cyanide, and amino acids during a Miller–Urey experiment, reproduced from Miller (1957) The concentrations of aldehydes and hydrogen cyanide during amino acid production in aqueous solution provided strong evidence that Strecker synthesis occurs in Miller–Urey chemical environments. Production of hydroxy acids through the cyanohydrin scheme also likely occurs. From: Cleaves, H.J. Prebiotic Chemistry: What We Know, What We Don't. Evo Edu Outreach 5, 342–360 (2012). Licensed under CC-BY 2.0. A photochemical path to HCN from NH3 and CH4 is: : NH3 + hv → NH2 + H : NH2 + CH4 → NH3 + CH3 : NH2 + CH3 → CH5N : CH5N + hv → HCN + 2H2 Other active intermediate compounds (acetylene, cyanoacetylene, etc.) have been detected in the aqueous solution of Miller–Urey-type experiments, but the immediate HCN and aldehyde production, the production of amino acids accompanying the plateau in HCN and aldehyde concentrations, and slowing of amino acid production rate during HCN and aldehyde depletion provided strong evidence that Strecker amino acid synthesis was occurring in the aqueous solution. The experiments showed that simple organic compounds, including the building blocks of proteins and other macromolecules, can abiotically be formed from gases with the addition of energy. == Related experiments and follow-up work ==

Contemporary experiments as viewed from the Huygens lander. Tholins, complex particles formed by UV irradiation on the N2 and CH4 atmosphere, are likely the source of the reddish haze. There were a few similar spark discharge experiments contemporaneous with Miller–Urey. An article in The New York Times (March 8, 1953) titled "Looking Back Two Billion Years" describes the work of Wollman M. MacNevin at Ohio State University, before the Miller Science paper was published in May 1953. MacNevin was passing 100,000V sparks through methane and water vapor and produced "resinous solids" that were "too complex for analysis." Furthermore, K. A. Wilde submitted a manuscript to Science on December 15, 1952, before Miller submitted his paper to the same journal in February 1953. Wilde's work, published on July 10, 1953, used voltages up to only 600V on a binary mixture of carbon dioxide (CO2) and water in a flow system and did not note any significant reduction products. According to some, the reports of these experiments explain why Urey was rushing Miller's manuscript through Science and threatening to submit to the Journal of the American Chemical Society. In 1961, Joan Oró produced milligrams of the nucleobase adenine from a concentrated solution of HCN and NH3 in water. Oró found that several amino acids were also formed from HCN and ammonia under those conditions. Experiments conducted later showed that the other RNA and DNA nucleobases could be obtained through simulated prebiotic chemistry with a reducing atmosphere. Other researchers also began using UV-photolysis in prebiotic schemes, as the UV flux would have been much higher on early Earth. For example, UV-photolysis of water vapor with carbon monoxide was found to yield various alcohols, aldehydes, and organic acids. In the 1970s, Carl Sagan used Miller–Urey-type reactions to synthesize and experiment with complex organic particles dubbed "tholins", which likely resemble particles formed in hazy atmospheres like that of Titan. Modified Miller–Urey experiments Much work has been done since the 1950s toward understanding how Miller–Urey chemistry behaves in various environmental settings. In 1983, testing different atmospheric compositions, Miller and another researcher repeated experiments with varying proportions of H2, H2O, N2, CO2 or CH4, and sometimes NH3. They found that the presence or absence of NH3 in the mixture did not significantly impact amino acid yield, as NH3 was generated from N2 during the spark discharge. In a Miller–Urey setup with a less-reducing (CO2 + N2 + H2O) atmosphere, when they added calcium carbonate to buffer the aqueous solution and ascorbic acid to inhibit oxidation, yields of amino acids greatly increased, demonstrating that amino acids can still be formed in more neutral atmospheres under the right geochemical conditions. Using high-performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry, Bada's lab analyzed old samples from a set of experiments Miller conducted with this apparatus and found some higher yields and a more diverse suite of amino acids. A 2021 work highlighted the importance of the high-energy free electrons present in the experiment. It is these electrons that produce ions and radicals, and represent an aspect of the experiment that needs to be better understood. After comparing Miller–Urey experiments conducted in borosilicate glassware with those conducted in Teflon apparatuses, a 2021 paper suggests that the glass reaction vessel acts as a mineral catalyst, implicating silicate rocks as important surfaces in prebiotic Miller–Urey reactions. ==Early Earth's prebiotic atmosphere==

While there is a lack of geochemical observations to constrain the exact composition of the prebiotic atmosphere, recent models point to an early "weakly reducing" atmosphere; that is, early Earth's atmosphere was likely dominated by CO2 and N2 and not CH4 and NH3 as used in the original Miller–Urey experiment. This is explained, in part, by the chemical composition of volcanic outgassing. Geologist William Rubey was one of the first to compile data on gases emitted from modern volcanoes and concluded that they are rich in CO2, H2O, and likely N2, with varying amounts of H2, sulfur dioxide (SO2), and H2S. Therefore, if the redox state of Earth's mantle — which dictates the composition of outgassing – has been constant since formation, then the atmosphere of early Earth was likely weakly reducing, but there are some arguments for a more-reducing atmosphere for the first few hundred million years. and Archean, but later work suggests solutions in that model might have violated conservation of mass and energy. That said, during hydrodynamic escape, lighter molecules like hydrogen can "drag" heavier molecules with them through collisions, and recent modeling of xenon escape has pointed to a hydrogen atmospheric mixing ratio of at least 1% or higher at times during the Archean. Taken together, the view that early Earth's atmosphere was weakly reducing, with transient instances of highly-reducing compositions following large impacts is generally supported. == Extraterrestrial sources of amino acids ==

, Washington, D.C. Conditions similar to those of the Miller–Urey experiments are present in other regions of the Solar System, often substituting ultraviolet light for lightning as the energy source for chemical reactions. The Murchison meteorite that fell near Murchison, Victoria, Australia in 1969 was found to contain an amino acid distribution remarkably similar to Miller–Urey discharge products. albeit at very low (ppb–ppm) concentrations. In this way, the organic composition of the Murchison meteorite is seen as evidence of Miller–Urey synthesis outside Earth. Comets and other icy outer-solar-system bodies are thought to contain large amounts of complex carbon compounds (such as tholins) formed by processes akin to Miller–Urey setups, darkening surfaces of these bodies. Some argue that comets bombarding the early Earth could have provided a large supply of complex organic molecules along with the water and other volatiles, however very low concentrations of biologically-relevant material combined with uncertainty surrounding the survival of organic matter upon impact make this difficult to determine. ==Relevance to the origin of life==

The Miller–Urey experiment was proof that the building blocks of life could be synthesized abiotically from gases, and introduced a new prebiotic chemistry framework through which to study the origin of life. Simulations of protein sequences present in the last universal common ancestor (LUCA), or the last shared ancestor of all extant species today, show an enrichment in simple amino acids that were available in the prebiotic environment according to Miller–Urey chemistry. This suggests that the genetic code from which all life evolved was rooted in a smaller suite of amino acids than those used today. Thus, while creationist arguments focus on the fact that Miller–Urey experiments have not generated all 22 genetically-encoded amino acids, this does not actually conflict with the evolutionary perspective on the origin of life. bias. Irradiation of magnetized magnetite with ultraviolet light generates spin-selective electrons. The helicity of the electrons leads to different redox reaction rates with different stereoisomers, leading to enantioselective products. Mechanisms like these mean that Miller–Urey and other prebiotic syntheses do not need to be enantioselective, as the environment can introduce homochirality. From: Ozturk, S.F. and Sasselov, D.D. On the origins of life's homochirality: inducing enantiomeric excess with spin-polarized electrons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119 (28) e2204765119 (2022). Licensed under CC-BY 4.0. Another common criticism is that the racemic mixture (containing both L and D enantiomers) of amino acids produced in a Miller–Urey experiment is not exemplary of abiogenesis theories, While it is true that Miller–Urey setups produce racemic mixtures, the origin of homochirality is a separate area in origin of life research. Recent work demonstrates that magnetic mineral surfaces like magnetite can be templates for the enantioselective crystallization of chiral molecules, including RNA precursors, due to the chiral-induced spin selectivity (CISS) effect. Once an enantioselective bias is introduced, homochirality can then propagate through biological systems in various ways. In this way, enantioselective synthesis is not required of Miller–Urey reactions if other geochemical processes in the environment are introducing homochirality. Finally, Miller–Urey and similar experiments primarily deal with the synthesis of monomers; polymerization of these building blocks to form peptides and other more complex structures is the next step of prebiotic chemistry schemes. Polymerization requires condensation reactions, which are thermodynamically unfavored in aqueous solutions because they expel water molecules. Scientists as far back as John Desmond Bernal in the late 1940s thus speculated that clay surfaces would play a large role in abiogenesis, as they might concentrate monomers. Several such models for mineral-mediated polymerization have emerged, such as the interlayers of layered double hydroxides like green rust over wet-dry cycles. Some scenarios for peptide formation have been proposed that are even compatible with aqueous solutions, such as the hydrophobic air-water interface Polymerization of life's building blocks is an active area of research in prebiotic chemistry. ==Amino acids identified==

Below is a table of amino acids produced and identified in the "classic" 1952 experiment, as analyzed by Miller in 1952 and more recently by Bada and collaborators with modern mass spectrometry, the 2008 re-analysis of vials from the volcanic spark discharge experiment, and the 2010 re-analysis of vials from the H2S-rich spark discharge experiment. While not all proteinogenic amino acids have been produced in spark discharge experiments, it is generally accepted that early life used a simpler set of prebiotically-available amino acids. ==References==