In 1986,
Jacques Gauthier defined the name
Ornithosuchia (previously coined by
Huene) for a branch-based clade including all archosaurs more closely related to birds than to crocodiles. It was thus a potentially larger group than the Ornithodira of Gauthier. In 1999
Michael Benton concluded that
Scleromochlus was indeed outside Gauthier's original conception of Ornithodira, so he named a new
branch-based clade for this purpose: Avemetatarsalia, named after the birds (
Aves), the last surviving members of the clade, and the metatarsal
ankle joint that was a typical character of the group. Avemetatarsalia was defined as all Avesuchia closer to Dinosauria than to
Crocodylia. In 2005, Sereno stated the opinion that Ornithodira was not a useful concept, whereas Avemetatarsalia was. In 2001, the same clade was given the name "Panaves" (, from Greek + Latin ), coined by Jacques Gauthier. He defined it as the largest and most inclusive clade of archosaurs containing Aves (birds, anchored on
Vultur gryphus) but not Crocodylia (anchored on
Crocodylus niloticus). Gauthier referred Aves, all other Dinosauria, all Pterosauria, and a variety of
Triassic archosaurs, including
Lagosuchus and
Scleromochlus, to this group. '' In a 2005 review of archosaur classification, Phil Senter attempted to resolve this conflicting set of terminology by applying strict priority to names based on when and how they were first defined. Senter noted that Ornithosuchia, the earliest name used for the total group of archosaurs closer to birds than to crocodiles, should be the valid name for that group, and have precedence over later names with identical definitions, such as Avemetatarsalia and Pan-Aves. While this has been followed by some researchers, others have either continued to use Avemetatarsalia or Ornithodira, or have followed Senter only reluctantly. Mike Taylor (2007) for example noted that, while Senter is correct in stating that Ornithosuchia has priority, this is "undesirable" because it probably excludes the eponymous family
Ornithosuchidae, and questioned the utility of using priority before the
PhyloCode is implemented to govern it. In fact, the name Ornithosuchia may be "illegal" under the PhyloCode because it does not include its eponymous taxon as part of its definition. }} Kammerer
et al. (2020) and Ezcurra
et al. (2020) supported an alternative hypothesis regarding the relationships of lagerpetids. They were interpreted as non-pterosaur pterosauromorphs. This phylogeny would shorten the morphological and chronological gap perceived between pterosaurs and other stem-birds, and explain the origin of this group. Bennett (2020) argued that
Scleromochlus, a genus historically considered a relative of ornithodirans or even a basal pterosauromorph, was instead a non-archosaur archosauriform (possibly a
doswelliid). In 2023, Nesbitt
et al. described
Mambachiton as the earliest diverging avemetatarsalian, outside of the minimally inclusive clade containing
aphanosaurs and ornithodirans. Preliminary analyses had considered
Mambachiton to be a
basal poposauroid (a clade of
pseudosuchians), though the later recognition of aphanosaurs as basal avemetatarsalians corrected this view. The results of the
phylogenetic analyses of Nesbit
et al. (2023) are shown in the cladogram below: |label1=
Archosauria}} ==References==