In January 1908 Milyukov addressed "The Civic Forum" in
Carnegie Hall. From the very beginning, the slogan and the idea of the empire ruled by Russians were very controversial regarding what "Russians" meant. One of the outspoken critics of the notion, Pavel Milyukov, considered the "
Russia for Russians" slogan to have been "a slogan of disunity... [and] not creative but destructive." In 1909, Milyukov addressed the
Russian State Duma on the issue of using
Ukrainian in the court system, attacking Russian nationalist deputies: "You say "Russia for Russians," but whom do you mean by "Russian"? You should say "Russia only for the
Great Russians," because that which you do not give to Muslims and Jews you also do not give your own nearest kin –
Ukraine." In 1912 he was reelected in the
Fourth Duma. According to Milyukov, in May 1914
Rasputin had become an influential factor in Russian politics. With the outbreak of World War I in August 1914, Milyukov swung to the right, but a
coup to remove the Tsar belonged to the possibilities. He had become a nationalist, patriotic policy of national defense, relying on
social chauvinism. (He was best friends with
Sergei Sazonov.) Milyukov insisted his younger son volunteer for the army (who subsequently died in battle). In August 1915 he formed the
Progressive Bloc and became the leader. Milyukov was regarded as a staunch supporter of the conquest of
Constantinople. In the nineties, Milyukov thoroughly studied the Balkans, which made him the most competent authority on Balkan politics. His opponents mockingly called him "Milyukov of
Dardanelles". In Summer 1916, at the request of
Rodzianko,
Protopopov led a delegation of Duma members (with Milyukov) to strengthen the ties with Russia's western allies in World War I: the
Entente powers. In August he gave lectures in Oxford. On 1 November 1916, in a
populist speech, he sharply criticized the Stürmer government for its inefficiency. He met professor
Tomáš Masaryk in London, and consulted with him about the present state of the
Czechoslovak Legion in Russia at that time.
"Stupidity or treason" speech At
Progressive Bloc meetings near the end of October, Progressives and left-Kadets argued that the revolutionary public mood could no longer be ignored and that the Duma should attack the entire tsarist system or lose whatever influence it had. Nationalists feared that a concerted stand against the government would jeopardize the existence of the Duma and further inflame the revolutionary feelings. Miliukov argued for and secured a tenuous adherence to a middle-ground tactic, attacking
Boris Stürmer and forcing his replacement. According to Stockdale, he had trouble gaining the support of his own party; at the 22–24 October Kadet fall conference provincial delegates "lashed out at Miliukov with unaccustomed ferocity. His travels abroad had made him poorly informed about the public mood, they charged; the patience of the people was exhausted." He responded with a plea to keep their ultimate goal in mind: It will be our task not to destroy the government, which would only aid anarchy, but to instill in it a completely different content, that is, to build a genuine constitutional order. That is why, in our struggle with the government, despite everything, we must retain a sense of proportion... To support anarchy in the name of the struggle with the government would be to risk all the political conquests we have made since 1905. The day before the opening of the Duma, the
Progressive Party pulled out of the bloc because they believed the situation called for more than a mere denunciation of Stürmer. On 1 November (O.S.) the government under the pro-peace Boris Stürmer was attacked in the Imperial Duma, not gathering since February.
Alexander Kerensky spoke first, called the ministers "hired assassins" and "cowards" and said they were "guided by the contemptible
Grishka [or Grigori] Rasputin!" The acting president
Rodzianko ordered him to leave, when calling for the overthrow of the government in wartime. Miliukov's speech was more than three times longer than Kerensky's, and delivered using much more moderate language. In his speech "Rasputin and Rasputuiza" he spoke of "treachery and betrayal, about the dark forces, fighting in favor of Germany". He highlighted numerous governmental failures, including the case
Sukhomlinov, concluding that Stürmer's policies placed in jeopardy the
Triple Entente. After each accusation – many times without basis – he asked "Is this stupidity or is it treason?" and the listeners answered "stupidity!", "treason!", etc. (Milyukov stated that it did not matter "Choose any ... as the consequences are the same.") Stürmer walked out, followed by all his ministers. He began by outlining how public hope had been lost over the course of the war, saying: "We have lost faith that the government can lead us to victory." He mentioned the rumours of treason and then proceeded to discuss some of the allegations: that Stürmer had freed Suchomlinov, that there was a great deal of pro-German propaganda, that he had been told that the enemy had access to Russian state secrets in his visits to allied countries and that Stürmer's private secretary [Ivan Manuilov-Manasevich] had been arrested for taking German bribes but was released when he kicked back to Stürmer. Milyukov was taken immediately by
Sir George Buchanan to the British Embassy and lived there till the
February Revolution; (according to Stockdale he went to the Crimea). It is not known what they discussed, but his speech was spread in flyers on the front and at the
Hinterland. Stürmer and Protopopov asked in vain for the dissolution of the Duma.
Tsarina Alexandra suggested to her husband to expel
Alexander Guchkov,
Prince Lvov, Milyukov and
Alexei Polivanov to Siberia. According to Melissa Kirschke Stockdale, it was a "volatile combination of revolutionary passions, escalating apprehension, and the near breakdown of unity in the moderate camp that provided the impetus for the most notorious address in the history of the Duma ...". The speech was a milestone on the road to
Rasputin's murder and the
February Revolution. Stockdale also points out that Miliukov admitted to some reservations about his evidence in his memoirs, where he observed that his listeners resolutely answered
treason "even in those aspects where I myself was not entirely sure." Richard Abraham, in his biography of Kerensky, argues that the withdrawal of the Progressists was essentially a vote of no confidence in Miliukov and that he grasped at the idea of accusing Stürmer in an effort to preserve his own influence. == February Revolution ==