Semi-Pelagian controversy The resolution of the Pelagian controversy gave rise to a new controversy in southern
Gaul in the fifth and sixth centuries, retrospectively called by the
misnomer "semi-Pelagianism". The "semi-Pelagians" all accepted the condemnation of Pelagius, believed grace was necessary for salvation, and were followers of Augustine. The controversy centered on differing interpretations of the verse
1 Timothy 2:4: "For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior, who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth." Augustine and
Prosper of Aquitaine assumed that
God's will is always effective and that some are not saved (i.e., opposing
universal reconciliation). Their opponents, based on the tradition of Eastern Christianity, argued that
Augustinian predestination contradicted the biblical passage.
John Cassian, whose writings survived, argued for
prevenient grace that individuals could accept or reject. Other semi-Pelagians were said to undermine the essential role of God's grace in salvation and argue for a median between Augustinianism and Pelagianism, although these alleged writings are no longer extant. At the
Council of Orange in 529, called and presided over by
Caesarius of Arles, semi-Pelagianism was condemned and the canons of Carthage which anathematizes the denial of inheritance of Original sin and its remission by infant baptism: the synod advocated
synergism, the idea that human freedom and divine grace work together for salvation. Christians often used "Pelagianism" as a criticism to imply that the target denied God's grace and strayed into heresy..
Pelagian manuscripts During the Middle Ages, Pelagius' writings were popular but usually attributed to other authors, especially Augustine and Jerome. Pelagius'
Commentary on Romans circulated under two pseudonymous versions, "Pseudo-Jerome" (copied before 432) and "Pseudo-Primasius", revised by
Cassiodorus in the sixth century to remove the "Pelagian errors" that Cassiodorus found in it. During the Middle Ages, it passed as a work by Jerome.
Erasmus of Rotterdam printed the commentary in 1516, in a volume of works by Jerome. Erasmus recognized that the work was not really Jerome's, writing that he did not know who the author was. Erasmus admired the commentary because it followed the consensus interpretation of Paul in the Greek tradition. The nineteenth-century theologian
Jacques Paul Migne suspected that Pelagius was the author, and
William Ince recognized Pelagius' authorship as early as 1887. The original version of the commentary was found and published by
Alexander Souter in 1926. According to French scholar , the Pelagian treatise
On the Christian Life was the second-most copied work during the Middle Ages (behind Augustine's
The City of God) outside of the Bible and liturgical texts.
Early modern era During the modern era, Pelagianism continued to be used as an epithet against orthodox Christians. However, there were also some authors who had essentially Pelagian views according to Nelson's definition. Nelson argued that many of those considered the predecessors to modern
liberalism took Pelagian or Pelagian-adjacent positions on the problem of evil. For instance,
Leibniz, who coined the word
theodicy in 1710, rejected Pelagianism but nevertheless proved to be "a crucial conduit for Pelagian ideas". He argued that "Freedom is deemed necessary in order that man may be deemed guilty and open to punishment." In ,
John Milton argued that "if, because of God's decree, man could not help but fall ... then God's restoration of fallen man was a matter of justice not grace". Milton also argued for other positions that could be considered Pelagian, such as that "The knowledge and survey of vice, is in this world ... necessary to the constituting of human virtue."
Jean-Jacques Rousseau made nearly identical arguments for that point.
John Locke argued that the idea that "all
Adams Posterity [are] doomed to Eternal Infinite Punishment, for the Transgression of
Adam" was "little consistent with the Justice or Goodness of the Great and Infinite God". He did not accept that original sin corrupted human nature, and argued that man could live a Christian life (although not "void of slips and falls") and be entitled to justification. Nelson argues that the drive for rational justification of religion, rather than a symptom of
secularization, was actually "a Pelagian response to the theodicy problem" because "the conviction that everything necessary for salvation must be accessible to human reason was yet another inference from God's justice". In Pelagianism, libertarian free will is
necessary but not sufficient for God's punishment of humans to be justified, because man must also understand God's commands. As a result, thinkers such as Locke, Rousseau and
Immanuel Kant argued that following
natural law without
revealed religion must be sufficient for the
salvation of those who were never exposed to Christianity because, as Locke pointed out, access to revelation is a matter of
moral luck. Early modern proto-liberals such as Milton, Locke, Leibniz, and Rousseau advocated
religious toleration and freedom of private action (eventually codified as
human rights), as only freely chosen actions could merit salvation. 19th-century philosopher
Søren Kierkegaard dealt with the same problems (nature, grace, freedom, and sin) as Augustine and Pelagius, which he believed were opposites in a
Hegelian dialectic. He rarely mentioned Pelagius explicitly even though he inclined towards a Pelagian viewpoint. However, Kierkegaard rejected the idea that man could perfect himself.
Contemporary responses John Rawls was a critic of Pelagianism, an attitude that he retained even after becoming an atheist. His anti-Pelagian ideas influenced his book
A Theory of Justice, in which he argued that differences in productivity between humans are a result of "moral arbitrariness" and therefore unequal wealth is undeserved. In contrast, the Pelagian position would be that human sufferings are largely the result of sin and are therefore deserved. According to Nelson, many contemporary
social liberals follow Rawls rather than the older liberal-Pelagian tradition. The conflict between Pelagius and the teachings of Augustine was a constant theme throughout the works of
Anthony Burgess, in books including
A Clockwork Orange,
Earthly Powers,
A Vision of Battlements and
The Wanting Seed.
Mateusz Morawiecki, the prime minister of Poland between 2017 and 2023, declared his support for Pelagianism.
Scholarly reassessment During the 20th century, Pelagius and his teachings underwent a reassessment. In 1956, John Ferguson wrote: Thomas Scheck writes that although Pelagius' views on original sin are still considered "one-sided and defective": ==See also==