Routine The
routine physical, also known as
general medical examination,
periodic health evaluation,
annual physical,
comprehensive medical exam,
general health check,
preventive health examination,
medical check-up, or simply
medical, is a physical examination performed on an asymptomatic patient for
medical screening purposes. These are normally performed by a
pediatrician,
family practice physician, a
physical therapist,
physician assistant, a certified
nurse practitioner or other
primary care provider. This routine physical exam usually includes the
HEENT evaluation. Nursing professionals such as
Registered Nurse,
Licensed Practical Nurses can develop a baseline
assessment to identify normal versus abnormal findings. These are reported to the primary care provider. If necessary, the patient may be sent to a
medical specialist for further, more detailed examinations. The term is generally
not meant to include visits for the purpose of newborn checks,
Pap smears for
cervical cancer, or regular visits for people with certain
chronic medical disorders (for example,
diabetes).
Evidence Although annual medical examinations are a routine practice in several countries, examinations performed on an asymptomatic patient are poorly supported by
scientific evidence in the majority of the population. A
Cochrane Collaboration meta-study found that routine annual physicals did not measurably reduce the risk of illness or death, and conversely, could lead to
overdiagnosis and over-treatment; however, this article does not conclude that being in regular communication with a doctor is not important, simply that an actual physical examination may not be necessary. Some notable general health organisations recommend against annual examinations, and propose a frequency adapted to age and previous examination results (
risk factors). The specialist
American Cancer Society recommends a cancer-related health check-up annually in men and women older than 40, and every three years for those older than 20. A
systematic review of studies until September 2006 concluded that the examination does result in better delivery of some other screening interventions (such as Pap smears,
cholesterol screening, and
faecal occult blood tests) and less patient worry. Evidence supports several of these individual screening interventions. The effects of annual check-ups on overall costs, patient
disability and
mortality, disease detection, and intermediate end points such a blood pressure or cholesterol, are inconclusive. Some employers require a mandatory health checkup before hiring a candidate, even though it is now well known that some of the components of the prophylactic annual visit may actually cause harm. For example, lab tests and exams that are performed on healthy patients (as opposed to people with symptoms or known illnesses) are statistically more likely to be "false positives"—that is, when test results suggest a problem that does not exist. Disadvantages cited include the time and money that could be saved by targeted screening (
health economics argument), increased anxiety over health risks (
medicalisation),
overdiagnosis, wrong diagnosis (for example
athletic heart syndrome misdiagnosed as
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy) and harm, or even death, resulting from unnecessary testing to detect or confirm, often non-existent, medical problems or while performing routine procedures as a followup after screening. , examining a patient's throat The lack of good evidence contrasts with population surveys showing that the general public is fond of these examinations, especially when they are free of charge. Despite guidelines recommending against routine annual examinations, many family physicians perform them. A
fee-for-service healthcare system has been suggested to promote this practice. This means choosing between a wide variety of tests.
Prevalence The routine physical is commonly performed in the United States and Japan, whereas the practice varies among South East Asia and mainland European countries. In Japan it is required by law for regular working employees to have a health check once a year.
History The roots of the periodic medical examination are not entirely clear. They have been referenced as early as 1671. They have also been advocated for since the 1920s. Some authors point to pleads from the 19th and early 20th century for the early detection of diseases like
tuberculosis, and periodic school health examinations. The advent of
medical insurance and related commercial influences seems to have promoted the examination, whereas this practice has been subject to controversy in the age of
evidence-based medicine. Several studies have been performed before current evidence-based recommendation for screening were formulated, limiting the applicability of these studies to current-day practice.
Comprehensive Comprehensive physical exams, also known as
executive physicals, typically include laboratory tests, chest x-rays, pulmonary function testing, audiograms, full body
CAT scanning,
EKGs, heart stress tests, vascular age tests, urinalysis, and mammograms or prostate exams depending on gender.
Pre-employment Pre-employment examinations are screening tests which judge the suitability of a worker for hire based on the results of their physical examination. This is also called
pre-employment medical clearance. Some employers believe that by only hiring workers whose physical examination results pass certain exclusionary criteria, their employees collectively will have fewer absences due to sickness, fewer workplace injuries, and less
occupational disease.
Insurance A physical examination may be provided under
health insurance cover, required of new insurance customers. This is a part of
insurance medicine. In the United States, physicals are also marketed to patients as a one-stop health review, avoiding the inconvenience of attending multiple appointments with different healthcare providers. == Uses ==