The family belongs or is closely related to the
tyrannosaur lineage. It was first named in 2010 by Oliver Rauhut and colleagues in their re-evaluation of the
type genus,
Proceratosaurus. Their study supported the idea that
Proceratosaurus is a coelurosaur, a
tyrannosauroid, and most closely related to the Chinese tyrannosauroid
Guanlong. They defined the
clade containing these two dinosaurs as all theropods closer to
Proceratosaurus than to
Tyrannosaurus,
Allosaurus,
Compsognathus,
Coelurus,
Ornithomimus, or
Deinonychus. In their re-evaluation of
Proceratosaurus, Rauhut
et al. stated that tooth taxa from the Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous previously assigned to the
dromaeosaurid subfamily
Velociraptorinae may instead be proceratosaurid in nature, due to the similarity between the teeth of the two groups and the fact that velociraptorines are otherwise unknown from the fossil record until the Late Cretaceous. This would mean that
Nuthetes and other dubious genera are potential proceratosaurids. In their comprehensive revision of the enigmatic Brazilian coelurosaurians
Mirischia and
Santanaraptor, Delcourt et al. (2025) consistently supported a clade containing
Dilong,
Guanlong,
Kileskus and
Proceratosaurus.
Tanycolagreus was grouped with this clade in equal-weight phylogenetic analyses, but was also grouped with
Mirischia,
Santanaraptor and
Juratyrant in implied-weight phylogenetic analyses. Unlike previous analyses, they found the Proceratosauridae as early-diverging
maniraptoromorphs outside Tyrannosauroidea. ==See also==