The lichen was first
scientifically described by
Carl Linnaeus in 1767 as
Lichen usnea. In his protologue, Linnaeus characterised it as a filamentous, (hanging) lichen with a smooth, compressed
thallus. He described the species as thread-like and branching, reaching up to a foot in length, with obtuse branch angles and a thallus that could separate into two layers. He noted that specimens were whitish when fresh but became grey-brown when dry. Linnaeus based part of his description on observations by the Dutch-born botanist
Nikolaus Joseph von Jacquin, who had collected extensively in the Caribbean and documented the species growing on trees in
Martinique, as well as reports of its presence in the
East Indies,
St. Helena, and
Madagascar. It underwent several
taxonomic changes over time.
Erik Acharius reclassified it as
Parmelia usneoides in 1803, and again in 1810 as
Alectoria usneoides.
Reginald Heber Howe, Jr. finally established its current name,
Ramalina usnea, in 1914. The
lectotype specimen (
Linnaean Herbarium 1273-278), collected from
Martinique, was designated by
Henry Imshaug in 1972. Chemical analysis revealed that the type specimen contains usnic and
divaricatic acids—a variant differing from earlier reports that identified only
ramalinolic and
sekikaic acids. It is also notable as the only confirmed historical collection of
R. usnea from the
Lesser Antilles, where the related species
R. peranceps is now more commonly found. A 1978 study revealed significant insights into the taxonomy of the
R. usnea species complex. Three distinct chemical races were identified within
R. usnea, each characterised by different substances in the medulla: a sekikaic acid race, a divaricatic acid race, and a race lacking diagnostic medullary compounds. This
chemotaxonomic approach has been important in understanding the species' diversity. Research has shown that
R. subanceps and
R. bogotensis are synonyms of
R. usnea, representing different
morphological expressions within the species' range of variation. The
R. usnea complex has been found to comprise four distinct species:
R. usnea,
Ramalina anceps,
Ramalina chilensis, and a newly described species,
Ramalina sharpii. Some researchers have questioned the distinction between
Ramalina usnea and
R. anceps, suggesting that
R. anceps may represent a
chemotype of
R. usnea. The two taxa are morphologically similar, with
R. anceps appearing thinner and less contorted, but these characteristics are considered unreliable for species delimitation. ==Description==