In the
Catholic Church,
cardinals, bishops and certain other dignitaries use a rochet, a garment that is worn over the
cassock for non-eucharistic liturgies or
Masses at which the wearer is not a celebrant. The Catholic rochet is a
tunic of white, usually fine
linen or
muslin (
batiste, mull) reaching about to the knee, and distinguished from the
surplice mainly by the narrower sleeves which make its arms tight-fitting. It is frequently trimmed with
lace. The lower edge and the sleeves may also be garnished with lace, lined with violet or red silk (in the case of
prelates), or, more rarely, embroidered borders. The rochet is proper to, and distinctive of, prelates and
bishops, but the right to wear it is sometimes granted by the
pope to others, especially the
canons of
cathedral churches. It is not a
vestis sacra, and thus cannot be used as a substitute for the
surplice (e.g., in the administering of the
Sacraments, following the Decree of the
Congregation of Rites of January 10, 1852). Nonetheless, since it is used at choir services and is ordered to be worn over everyday dress at Mass (Missa rom. Rit. celebr. i. 2), it may be included among liturgical vestments in the widest sense. It is worn instead of a surplice by
Canons Regular as part of their
habit for liturgical use alone.
Godfried Danneels wearing
scarlet, with three
bishops in purple. All their rochets are in white. The earliest notice of the use of the rochet is found in a 9th-century inventory of vestments of the Roman clergy. In this, it is called
camisia, a name which it retained at Rome until the 14th century. It seems to have been proper to particular members of the clergy by that time. Other Roman names for the vestment were
succa, sucta; it was not until the 14th century that the name
rochettum appeared at Rome, but it was not long before it had superseded all the native designations. In the
Middle Ages, it was always plain. Outside Rome, the vestment is met with fairly early, e.g. in the
Frankish empire (9th century) as
alba clericalis, in contrast to the liturgical
alb, and in England (10th century) under the name of
oferslip (in the 46th canon of the ecclesiastical laws of Edgar). At the beginning of the 12th century, the rochet is mentioned under the name of
camisia, by Gilbert of Limerick and by Honorius, and, somewhat later, by
Gerloh of Reichersperg as
tunica talaris. From the 13th century onward, it is frequently mentioned. The name
rocheltum is first traceable in England; in Germany and northern France, the rochet was also called
sarohi (Latinized
sarrotus) or
sarcos (Latinized
sarcotium). Outside Rome, the rochet was, until well into the 14th century, a vestment common to all the clergy, especially to those of lower orders; and so it remained in some places as late as the 19th. Moreover, in especially in the German dioceses, it had a liturgical character, being used instead of the surplice. The rochet was originally a robe-like tunic, and was therefore
girdled, like the liturgical alb. As late as 1260, the provincial synod of
Cologne decreed that the
vestis camisialis must be long enough to cover everyday dress entirely. A good example of the
camisia of the 12th century is the rochet of
Thomas Becket preserved at Dammartin in the
Pas de Calais. It is the only surviving mediaeval example, and remarkable for its
pleating: this, as with albs, gave greater breadth and more elaborate folds. In the 15th century, the rochet reached only halfway down the shin; by the 16th and 17th, to the knee; in the 18th and 19th, often until only mid-thigh. == Anglican use ==