The identity created by the Safavid monarchs and the Persian-speaking urban elites who backed them was based on religion. The Safavids portrayed themselves as the rightful successors of the
Twelve Imams in
Shia Islam and reinforced this claim through their fabricated genealogical link to the third Shia Imam,
Husayn ibn Ali, through his supposed marriage to
Shahrbanu, the daughter of last
Sasanian ruler
Yazdegerd III. By constructing this lineage, the Safavids emphasized their Persian genealogical heritage. , around 26 years old.
Nighttime in a City, by
Mir Sayyid Ali, 1540 (Sackler Museum, 1958.76). The Safavids also drew inspiration from earlier times, both historical and mythological. The historical component was the
Turco-Mongol tradition, which the Safavids considered themselves the inheritor of. The 14th century warlord
Timur influenced their self-image. In his autobiography,
Shah Tahmasp I mentioned that he often read the
Tarikh-e Teymur. This romanticized past was given renewed attention once the Safavids abandoned their role as warriors. The mythological component was references to pre-Islamic kings and heroes.
Zahhak,
Fereydun and
Jamshid were amongst the figures that
Shah Ismail I compared himself to in his poetry. His two sons
Sam and Rostam, had traditional Persian names. When
Shah Soltan Hoseyn was crowned shah in 1694, Jamshid and
Kay Kawad were amongst the pre-Islamic figures mentioned in the
khotba speech by the
sheykh al-islam of
Isfahan,
Mohammad Baqer Majlesi. The
Tohfat al-alam, a
paean to Shah Soltan Hoseyn composed about ten years after his coronation, contains similar themes. Although many dynasties in Iran remembered only fractions of the past, they still aimed to claim a connection to it, a tradition the Safavids continued. The Dutch
Iranologist Rudi Matthee adds "Yet that does not mean that the Safavids were engaged in a systematic and comprehensive mining of the past with the intention of "retrieving" an authentic identity". The identity of the Safavids was broad in certain aspects, consistent with premodern custom. The Safavid dynasty was likely of
Kurdish origin, while Shah Ismail I had
Pontic Greek descent and spoke a variant of
Azerbaijani Turkic. Both Rudi Matthee and English–American Iranologist
Dick Davis agree that "pure identity was not part of Iran's early, multi-ethnic and imperial consciousness and emerged only in Sasanian times". The Safavids still set themselves apart from others, mainly judging by perceived levels of civilization. Those considered barbarians were not only outsiders but also certain neighboring Muslims, including
Arabs, Turks, and
Kurds. Texts in Persian portrayed them all as primitive, unpredictable and unreliable. The Safavids considered the truly uncivilized groups to include the
Turkmens,
Lezgins,
Kipchaks, and
Uzbeks. This grouping also included the Russians, whom the Iranians reportedly called the "Uzbeks of Europe". The Safavid outlook on civilization also included
Western Europeans, albeit they were rarely mentioned in Persian texts. These texts make little mention of Europe (
Farangestan) as a competitor, threat, or point of comparison, even long after the Safavid dynasty. Secondary sources, typically from Europe, provide the majority of the information regarding Safavid views on Europeans. Legitimacy in the Safavid chronicles revolved around support for the shah and his associates, not adherence to the Muslim divine order or ties to the land. In this system, loyalty became the key and nearly exclusive condition for inclusion. The clerical elite in Iran justified this perspective in religious terms, seeing the dynasty and its shah as essential to upholding and safeguarding the divine order. ==Culture==