The
1916 West Coast waterfront strike was the first instance of coastwide organizational unity among West Coast longshore workers. The strike resulted in a massive defeat for the ILA and employers launching an effort to eliminate the ILA's presence on the waterfront entirely. In the years immediately after
World War I, when the shipping companies and stevedoring firms had imposed the
open shop after a series of failed strikes,
longshoremen on the West Coast ports were unorganized or represented by
company unions. Longshoremen in San Francisco, then the major port on the coast, were required to go through a hiring hall operated by a company union, known as the "blue book" system for the color of the membership book. The
Industrial Workers of the World, nicknamed "Wobblies," had attempted to organize longshoremen, sailors and fishermen in the 1920s through their Marine Transport Workers Union. Their largest strike, the
1923 San Pedro Maritime Strike, stalled shipping in that harbor but was crushed by a combination of injunctions, mass arrests and vigilantism by the
American Legion. Other Wobbly-led strikes occurred in
Seattle in 1919 and
Portland in 1922. Longshoremen and sailors on the West Coast also had contacts with an Australian syndicalist movement that called itself the "
One Big Union" formed after the defeat of a
general strike there in 1917. , one of the leaders of the strike, July 9, 1934 The
Communist Party had also been active in the area in the late 1920s, seeking to organize all categories of maritime workers into a single union, the
Marine Workers Industrial Union (MWIU), as part of the drive during the
Third Period to create revolutionary unions. The MWIU never made much headway on the West Coast, but it did attract a number of former
IWW members and foreign-born militants.
Harry Bridges, an Australian-born sailor who became a longshoreman after coming to the United States and played an instrumental role in organizing the 1934 strike, was often alleged to be an active member of the Communist party. Militants published a newspaper,
The Waterfront Worker, which focused on longshoremen's most pressing demands: more men on each gang, lighter loads and an independent union. While a number of the individuals in this group were Communist Party members, the group as a whole was independent of the party: although it criticized the
International Seamen's Union (ISU) as weak and the
International Longshoremen's Association (ILA), which had its base on the
East Coast, as corrupt, it was not wholly loyal to the MWIU, but emphasized the creation of small groups of activists at each port to serve as the first step in a slow, careful movement to unionize the industry. These newly emboldened workers first went after the "blue book" union, refusing to pay dues to it and tearing up their membership books. The militants who had published "The Waterfront Worker", now known as the "Albion Hall group" after their usual meeting place, continued organizing dock committees that soon began launching
slowdowns and other types of job actions in order to win better working conditions. When the conservative ILA leadership negotiated a weak "gentlemen's agreement" with the employers that had been brokered by the mediation board created by the administration of President
Franklin D. Roosevelt, Bridges led the membership in rejecting it. Disputes revolved around the issue of recognition: the union demanded a
closed shop, a coastwide contract and a union hiring hall. The employers offered to arbitrate the dispute, but insisted that the union agree to an open shop as a condition of any agreement to arbitrate. The longshoremen rejected the proposal to arbitrate. ==The Big Strike==