Scansoriopterygidae was created as a
family-level
taxon by Stephen Czerkas and Yuan Chongxi in 2002. Some scientists, such as
Paul Sereno, initially considered the concept redundant because the group was originally monotypic, containing only the single genus and species
Scansoriopteryx heilmanni. Additionally, the group lacked a
phylogenetic definition. However, in 2008 Zhang et al. reported another scansoriopterygid,
Epidexipteryx, and defined Scansoriopterygidae as a
clade comprising most recent common ancestor of
Epidexipteryx and
Epidendrosaurus (=
Scansoriopteryx) plus all its descendants. The exact taxonomic placement of this group was initially uncertain and controversial. When describing the first validly published specimen in 2002 (
Scansoriopteryx heilmanni), Czerkas and Yuan proposed that various primitive features of the skeleton (including a primitive, "saurischian-style" pubis and primitive hip joint) showed that scansoriopterygids, along with other maniraptorans and birds, split from other theropods very early in dinosaur evolution. This view was supported by a second phylogenetic analysis performed by Zhang et al. in 2008. A subsequent phylogenetic analysis conducted by Agnolín and Novas (2011) recovered scansoriopterygids not as avialans, but as basal members of the clade
Paraves remaining in unresolved
polytomy with
alvarezsaurids and the clade Eumaniraptora (containing avialans and
deinonychosaurs). Turner, Makovicky and Norell (2012) included only
Epidexipteryx hui in their primary phylogenetic analysis, as a full-grown specimen of this species is known; regarding
Scansoriopteryx/
Epidendrosaurus, the authors were worried that including it in the primary analysis would be problematic, because it is only known from juvenile specimens, which "do not necessarily preserve all the adult morphology needed to accurately place a taxon phylogenetically" (Turner, Makovicky and Norell 2012, p. 89).
Epidexipteryx was recovered as basal paravian that didn't belong to Eumaniraptora. The authors did note that its phylogenetic position is unstable; constraining
Epidexipteryx hui as a basal avialan required two additional steps compared to the most parsimonious solution, while constraining it as a basal member of
Oviraptorosauria required only one additional step. A separate exploratory analysis included
Scansoriopteryx/
Epidendrosaurus, which was recovered as a basal member of Avialae; the authors noted that it did not clade with
Epidexipteryx, which stayed outside Eumaniraptora. Constraining the monophyly of Scansoriopterygidae required four additional steps and moved
Epidexipteryx into Avialae. A monophyletic Scansoriopterygidae was recovered by Godefroit et al. (2013); the authors found scansoriopterygids to be basalmost members of Paraves and the sister group to the clade containing Avialae and Deinonychosauria. Agnolín and Novas (2013) recovered scansoriopterygids as non-paravian maniraptorans and the sister group to Oviraptorosauria. Brusatte et al. (2014) also found
Epidexipteryx to be a basal oviraptorosaur along with
Pedopenna. The Bayesian analysis of Cau (2018) placed scansoriopterygids in Oviraptorosauria again, while the parsimony analysis placed them in the base of Avialae, and included
Xiaotingia in Scansoriopterygidae as sister to the rest of the group. Pittman et al. (2020) again found scansoriopterygids to be basal oviraptorosaurs. Cau (2024) placed Scansoriopterygidae within
Anchiornithidae. The cladogram below follows the results of a phylogenetic study by Lefèvre et al., 2014: }} }} }} }} }} Sorkin (2021) argues scansoriopterygids provide evidence that all pennaraptorans evolved from scansorial gliding ancestors. == Provenance and paleoecology ==