MarketSemi-Arianism
Company Profile

Semi-Arianism

Semi-Arianism was a position regarding the relationship between God the Father and the Son of God, adopted by some 4th-century Christians. Though the doctrine modified the teachings of Arianism, it still rejected the doctrine that Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are coeternal and of the same substance, or consubstantial, and was therefore considered heretical by many contemporary Christians.

History
Arianism was the view of Arius and his followers, the Arians, that Jesus was subordinate to, and of a different being (ousia) from, God the Father. Arians opposed the view that the three persons of the Trinity were of one being or substance. Arianism spread throughout the Church of Alexandria and the Eastern Mediterranean. After the First Council of Nicaea condemned Arianism as heresy, many Christians adopted compromise views in which they remained in communion with Arians without adopting Arianism itself. Various formulae, such as the homoiousian and the homoean, were proposed to compromise between Arian teachings (heteroousios) and the doctrine of one substance (homoousios) asserted in the Nicene Creed. After the 325 Council of Nicaea anathematized Arianism, the majority of the Eastern bishops—who agreed to the deposition of Athanasius of Alexandria at Tyre in 335 and received the Arians into communion at Jerusalem upon their repentance—were not Arians. The Dedication Council of Antioch in 341 put forth a creed that was unexceptionable except for its omission of the Nicene formula "of One Substance." Even disciples of Arius, such as Bishop George of Laodicea (335–47) and Eustathius of Sebaste (c. 356–80), joined the moderate party. After the death of Eusebius of Nicomedia, the leaders of the court faction—Ursacius of Singidunum, Valens of Mursa, and Germinius of Sirmium—were not tied to any formula, for Emperor Constantius II himself hated Arianism, although he disliked Athanasius even more. When Marcellus of Ancyra was deposed in 336, he was succeeded by Basil. Marcellus was reinstated by the Council of Serdica and by Bishop Julius of Rome in 343, but Basil was restored in 350 by Constantius, over whom he gained considerable influence. Basil led a council at Sirmium in 351, held against Photinus, who had been a deacon at Ancyra; the canons of this synod begin by condemning Arianism, though they do not meet the Nicene standard. Basil later had a disputation with the Anomoean Aëtius. After the defeat of Magnentius at Mursa in 351, Valens, bishop of that city, became Constantius's spiritual director. In 355 Valens and Ursacius obtained the exile of the Western confessors Eusebius, Lucifer of Cagliari, Hilary of Poitiers, and Liberius. In 357 they issued the second Creed of Sirmium, or "formula of Hosius", in which homoousios and homoiousios were both absent. Eudoxius seized the see of Antioch and supported Aëtius and his disciple Eunomius. It has also been noted that the Greek term "homoousian", which Athanasius of Alexandria favored, was reported to have been used and favored by Sabellius, and that many followers of Athanasius took issue with and were uneasy about the term. The Semi-Arians also objected to it. Their objection to "homoousian" was that it was considered un-Scriptural, suspicious, and of a Sabellian tendency. This was because Sabellius also considered the Father and the Son to be "one substance", meaning that, to Sabellius, the Father and Son were "one essential person" interacting with creation as necessary. Basil of Ancyra In Lent of 358, Basil, along with many bishops, was holding the dedicatory feast of a new church he had built at Ancyra when he received a letter from George of Laodicea relating how Eudoxius had approved of Aëtius and begging Macedonius of Constantinople, Basil, and the rest of the assembled bishops to decree the expulsion of Eudoxius and his followers from Antioch, lest that great see be lost. Consequently, the Synod of Ancyra published a long reply addressed to George and the other bishops of Phoenicia, in which they recited the Creed of Antioch (341), added explanations against the "unlikeness" of the Son to the Father taught by the Arians and Anomoeans (from anomoios), and showed that the very name of Father implies a Son of like substance (homoiousios, or homoios kat ousian). Anathematisms were appended in which Anomoeanism was explicitly condemned and the teaching of "likeness of substance" was enforced. The nineteenth of these canons also forbids the use of homoousios and tautoousios; this may be an afterthought prompted by the instance of Macedonius, as Basil does not seem to have insisted on it later. Legates were dispatched to the council at Sirmium; Basil, Eustathius of Sebaste, an ascetic of no dogmatic principles; Eleusius of Cyzicus, a follower of Macedonius; and the priest Leontius, one of the emperor's chaplains. They arrived just in time, for the emperor had been lending his ear to a Eudoxian, but he now veered round, issuing a letter (Sozomen, IV, xiv) declaring the Son to be "like in substance" to the Father and condemning the Arians of Antioch. According to Sozomen, at this point Pope Liberius was released from exile upon signing three formulae combined by Basil. Basil persuaded Constantius to summon a general council, Ancyra being proposed, then Nicomedia (both in Asia Minor), but as the latter city was destroyed by an earthquake, Basil was again at Sirmium in 359, where the Arianizers had meanwhile regained their footing. With Germinius of Sirmium, George of Alexandria, Ursacius and Valens, and Bishop (later Saint) Marcus of Arethusa, he held a conference that lasted until night. A confession of faith, ridiculed under the name of the "dated creed", was drawn up by Marcus on 22 May (Hilary, "Fragment. xv"). Arianism was, of course, rejected, but the homoios kata ten ousian was not admitted, and the expression kata panta homoios, "like in all things", was substituted. Basil was disappointed and added to his signature the explanation that the words "in all things" meant not only in will but in existence and being (kata ten hyparxin kai kata to einai). Not content with this, Basil, George of Laodicea, and others published a joint explanation (Epiph., lxxiii, 12–22) that "in all things" must include "substance". However, when the Trinity was officially defined, the offended binitarians walked out. For the rest of the history of the Semi-Arians (also called Macedonians), see Pneumatomachi. In more modern times, Semi-Arian groups are said to include non-Trinitarian bodies such as Jehovah's Witnesses and Creation Seventh-day Adventists. ==See also==
tickerdossier.comtickerdossier.substack.com