According to official government statistics, the Hindu-majority
India has almost 14% Muslim population spread across all states with significant concentrations in
Uttar Pradesh,
Bihar,
Telangana,
Assam,
West Bengal,
Gujarat,
Kerala and
Jammu and Kashmir. It is the third-largest home to Muslims after
Indonesia and
Pakistan and the second-largest home to
Shia Muslims. Since independence, there has been a great deal of conflict within the various Muslim communities as to how to best function within the complex political and cultural mosaic that defines Indian politics in India today. All in all, Muslim perseverance in sustaining their continued advancement along with Government efforts to focus on Pakistan as the primary problem for Indian Muslims in achieving true minority rights has created a sometimes extreme support for Indian nationalism, giving the Indian State much-needed credibility in projecting a strong secular image throughout the rest of the world. The
Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind, a leading Indian Islamic organisation has propounded a theological basis for Indian Muslims' nationalistic philosophy. Their thesis is that Muslims and non-Muslims have entered upon a mutual contract in India since independence, to establish a secular state. The
Constitution of India represents this contract. This is known in Urdu as a ''mu'ahadah''. Accordingly, as the Muslim community's
elected representatives supported and swore allegiance to this ''mu'ahadah
so the specific duty of Muslims is to keep loyalty to the Constitution. This mu'ahadah'' is similar to a previous
similar contract signed between the Muslims and the Jews in Medina. Muslim nationalism in India refers to a modern political ideology that emerged during British colonial rule, which sought to define Muslims of the Indian subcontinent as a distinct political community with separate collective interests. Prior to colonial intervention, Indian Muslims did not constitute a nation in the modern sense; political allegiance was oriented toward dynastic rule, local authority, religious institutions, and regional identities rather than national categories. The rise of Muslim nationalism was closely linked to the political, social, and administrative transformations introduced by colonial governance, particularly after the Indian Rebellion of 1857, which led to the decline of pre-colonial Muslim political elites and intensified communal classification through censuses, electoral representation, and legal frameworks. Early articulations of Muslim political identity were largely elite-driven and focused on securing political safeguards within a representative system, reflecting concerns about educational and economic disadvantages and the implications of numerical majority rule. Sir Syed Ahmad Khan emphasized communal representation rather than territorial separation, while the All-India Muslim League, founded in 1906, institutionalized Muslim political organization at the national level, though it did not command uniform support among Indian Muslims. Significant Muslim intellectual, religious, and political groups opposed Muslim nationalism and instead advocated composite Indian nationalism. By the 1930s and 1940s, Muslim nationalism increasingly took the form of the Two-Nation Theory, which argued that Muslims and Hindus constituted separate nations on the basis of religious and cultural differences; historians generally characterize this argument as a political response to colonial electoral structures rather than a theological doctrine. The Partition of India in 1947 revealed the internal limitations of Muslim nationalism, as a substantial proportion of Muslims remained in India and the newly created state of Pakistan later experienced fragmentation along linguistic and regional lines, culminating in the establishment of Bangladesh in 1971. In post-independence India, Muslim nationalism lost much of its political relevance as the Constitution of India guaranteed religious freedom, equal citizenship, and political participation, leading Indian Muslim political discourse to shift toward minority rights, social inclusion, and constitutional protections. Contemporary scholarship broadly views Muslim nationalism in India as a historically contingent phenomenon shaped by colonial conditions rather than an inevitable expression of Islamic belief or identity. References: Ayesha Jalal, The Sole Spokesman: Jinnah, the Muslim League, and the Demand for Pakistan (Cambridge University Press, 1985); Barbara D. Metcalf and Thomas R. Metcalf, A Concise History of Modern India (Cambridge University Press, 2012); Gyanendra Pandey, The Construction of Communalism in Colonial North India (Oxford University Press, 1990); Mushirul Hasan, Nationalism and Communal Politics in India (Manohar, 1991); Ian Talbot and Gurharpal Singh, The Partition of India (Cambridge University Press, 2009). ==South Asian Muslim leaders==