Suspicions have been raised that talc use contributes to certain types of disease, mainly cancers of the ovaries and lungs. According to the
IARC, talc containing asbestos is classified as a
group 1 agent (carcinogenic to humans), talc use in the
perineum is classified as
group 2B (possibly carcinogenic to humans), and talc not containing asbestos is classified as
group 2A (probably carcinogenic to humans). Reviews by
Cancer Research UK and the
American Cancer Society conclude that some studies have found a link, but other studies have not. The studies discuss
pulmonary issues,
lung cancer, In 2018,
Health Canada issued a warning against inhaling talcum powder or women's using it perineally. In contrast, however, research published in 1995 and 2000 concluded that, although it was plausible that talc could cause ovarian cancer, no conclusive evidence had been shown. Further, a 2008
European Journal of Cancer Prevention review of ovarian cancer and talc use studies pointed out that, although many of them examined the duration, frequency, and accumulation of hygienic talc use, few found a positive association among these factors and some found a negative one: "It may be argued that the overall null findings associated with talc-dusted diaphragms and condom use is more convincing evidence for a lack of a carcinogenic effect, especially given the lack of an established correlation between perineal dusting frequency and ovarian tissue talc concentrations and the lack of a consistent dose-response relationship with ovarian cancer risk." Instead, the authors credited powdered talc with "a high degree of safety." Similarly, in a 2014 article published in a leading cancer journal, the
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, researchers reported the results of a survey of 61,576 postmenopausal women, more than half of whom had used talc powder perineally. The researchers compared the subjects' reports of their own talc use with their reports of having had ovarian cancer diagnosed by their doctors, and found, regardless of subjects' age and tubal ligation status, "Ever use of perineal powder ... was not associated with risk of ovarian cancer compared with never use," nor was any greater individual cancer risk associated with longer use of talc powder. On this basis, the article concluded, "perineal powder use does not appear to influence ovarian cancer risk." The
Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel concluded in 2015 that talc, in the concentrations currently used in cosmetics, is safe. In July 2024, the
International Agency for Research on Cancer listed talc as "probably"
carcinogenic for humans. The study is based on limited evidence it could cause
ovarian cancer in humans.
Industrial grade In the United States, the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration and
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health have set occupational exposure limits to respirable talc dusts at 2 mg/m3 over an eight-hour workday. At levels of 1000 mg/m3, inhalation of talc is considered
immediately dangerous to life and health.
Food grade The United States
Food and Drug Administration considers talc (magnesium silicate)
generally recognized as safe (GRAS) to use as an
anticaking agent in table salt in concentrations smaller than 2%.
Association with asbestos One particular issue with commercial use of talc is its frequent co-location in underground deposits with
asbestos ore. Asbestos is a general term for different types of fibrous silicate minerals, desirable in construction for their heat resistant properties. There are six varieties of asbestos; the most common variety in manufacturing,
white asbestos, is in the
serpentine family. Serpentine minerals are
sheet silicates; although not in the serpentine family, talc is also a sheet silicate, with two sheets connected by magnesium cations. The frequent co-location of talc deposits with asbestos may result in contamination of mined talc with white asbestos, which poses serious health risks when dispersed into the air and inhaled. Stringent quality control since 1976, including separating
cosmetic- and
food-grade talc from that destined for industrial use, has largely eliminated this issue, but it remains a potential hazard requiring mitigation in the mining and processing of talc. A 2010 US
FDA survey failed to find asbestos in a variety of talc-containing products. {{cite web ==Litigation==