From the very first days of his victory, Yunus-Khoja began consolidating his rule and making use of the state administration apparatus. Initially, his governance was quite rudimentary. According to
Muhammad Salih Qari Tashkendi, the feudal-tribal nobility of the nomads played a key role in organizing his government. Rustam-Tura was appointed to the position of
atalyq, Adil-Tura as
parvanači, and Babakhan-Tura as the commander-in-chief. Yunus-Khoja himself was unanimously proclaimed
Wali of Vilayat (ruler of the province). According to Russian envoys D. Telyatnikov and M. Pospelov, as well as statements made by the Tashkent envoy in
Omsk, Muhammad-Khoja Rahim oglu, the ruler of the Tashkent state was a
khan who referred to himself with the title of
Ishan. The "khan" of Tashkent, Yunus-Khoja, although surrounded by his supporters from among the nomads, was forced to consult and make state decisions not only with them but also with representatives of each of the four
Daha—
Kokcha,
Sibzar,
Sheykhantaur and
Beshagach (the districts of the
Tashkent city). Four
aqsaqals of city formed the khan's council, advising him on both national and military affairs. These elders (
aksakals) represented the four parts of the city and were elected by the population to the highest administrative public positions within their respective
Daha. Coming from the most prosperous and therefore most influential class of city dwellers, they guided Yunus-Khoja's state policy based on the interests of the large
merchants and
artisans who formed the core of the
urban population.
Foreign relations Kazakh tribes Having seized Tashkent, Yunus-Khoja, according to the Kokand historian Muhammad-Hakim, also brought the
Kazakh steppes under his control. Pospelov's report indicates that the conquest of the Kazakh steppes was completed in 1798. These same sources establish that the authority of the ruler of Tashkent was limited to the territory of the
Senior Jüz, extending to the area of
Chimkent in the northeast and
Turkestan in the north, exclusively. In his renowned work
"Description of the Kyrgyz-Kazakh, or Kyrgyz-Kaisak Hordes and Steppes," A. I. Levshin wrote:It is unknown why the Kyrgyz-Kazakhs, possessing such great strength, never fully seized Tashkent and did not settle there. However, it is certain that this city suffered from their raids almost until recent times. The khans of Tashkent, being weak and lacking initiative, sought to avert these incursions more through flattery, gifts, and concessions rather than resistance and decisive countermeasures. The Kyrgyz-Kazakhs, in turn, became accustomed to viewing such leniency as a sign of weakness, and consequently, this approach encouraged them to continue their acts of violence rather than deterred them.Sources that describe the subjugation of the Kazakhs as having been carried out "without bloodshed" also report the exceptionally harsh measures used by Yunus-Khoja in his war against the Kazakhs. To ensure loyalty and the fulfillment of vassal obligations, hostages (
amanats) were taken from each tribe, specifically from among the tribal elite. If a tribe failed to uphold its vassal duties, these hostages were subjected to repressive measures, including execution. After conquering the
Senior Jüz, Yunus-Khoja abolished the khanate title and governed the
Senior Jüz through his own appointees, who were selected from the nobility of individual tribes.
Relations with Russia in
St. Petersburg. Embassies of Tashkent and other
Central Asian states were received here. Yunus-Khoja sends diplomatic mission to the West Siberian Administration of
Russian Empire with the following message: The original letter bore the
seal of Yunus-Khoja. It was an elongated hexagon, with
Yunus-Khoja’s name engraved on it. Along the outer edge of the seal, there was a narrow band forming a border, adorned with a vegetal ornament characteristic of the decorative patterns commonly found in Tashkent's traditional wood carving.
Military The
karakazan army was a key military force in Tashkent under Yunus Khoja. According to Muhammad Salih Qori Tashkandi and D. Telyatnikov, it consisted of Yunus Khoja’s personal troops, his sons, and high-ranking officials, mainly from the elite and sedentary population. Each unit was led by a commander, quartered on his estate, and equipped with weapons and horses provided by their leader. Soldiers received land for sustenance and were exempt from taxes but had to work on their commander’s fields. The karakazans were mainly recruited from fugitives of various backgrounds, including
Kalmyks,
Uzbeks,
Khoqandians,
Bukharans, but there were very few native Tashkent people among the Karakazans. Many were prisoners captured in raids, especially from the
Kazakh steppe. They were well-armed, using matchlock rifles, armor, shields, and helmets. By 1800, Tashkent’s artillery included large-caliber cannons made from Russian-imported copper. Locally produced gunpowder and ammunition were noted for their quality. The army of the Karakazans was not particularly numerous. Even 12 years after Yunus-Khoja came to power, according to D. Telyatnikov, it numbered only 2 thousand people. However, it was of great importance as an organized military-police force and the core of the armed forces of Tashkent, the bulk of which consisted of the city militia and the militia of nomadic tribes, mainly Sanychkly,
Kangly, Bagys and Ramadan. One or two people from each house, and sometimes all men, were called up to the city militia in Tashkent city. By the late 18th century, the army grew to 6,000 troops, supported by a feudal militia of 50,000–70,000, including 30,000 urban militia. Tashkent’s military strength allowed it to dominate the Chirchik Valley and reassert control over local nomadic tribes. == Demographics ==