Chalcolithic Artifacts from the late
Ubaid and late
Chalcolithic periods were recovered from the central mound.
Early Bronze Ebla was first settled around 3500 BC; its growth was supported by many satellite agricultural settlements. The city benefited from its role as an
entrepôt of growing international trade, which probably began with an increased demand for
wool in
Sumer. Archaeologists designate this early habitation period "Mardikh I"; it ended around 3000 BC. Mardikh I is followed by the first and second kingdoms era between about 3000 and 2000 BC, designated "Mardikh II".
I. J. Gelb considered Ebla a part of the
Kish civilization, which was a cultural entity of
East Semitic-speaking populations that stretched from the center of Mesopotamia to the western Levant.
First kingdom Ebla was the most prominent kingdom among the Syrian states during the first kingdom period between about 3000 and 2300 BC, particularly during the second half of the 3rd millennium BC, known as "the age of the archives" after the Ebla tablets.
Mardikh IIA: The early period between 3000 and 2400 BC is designated "Mardikh IIA". General knowledge about the city's history prior to the written archives is obtained through excavations. The first stages of Mardikh IIA is identified with building "CC", and structures that form a part of building "G2", which was apparently a royal palace built BC. Toward the end of this period, a
hundred years' war with
Mari started. Mari gained the upper hand through the actions of its king
Saʿumu, who conquered many of Ebla's cities. In the mid-25th century BC, king
Kun-Damu defeated Mari, but the state's power declined following his reign.
Mardikh IIB1: The archive period, which is designated "Mardikh IIB1", lasted from BC until BC. The end of the period is known as the "first destruction", mainly referring to the destruction of the royal palace (called palace "G" and built over the earlier "G2"), and much of the acropolis. During the archive period, Ebla had political and military dominance over the other Syrian city-states of northern and eastern Syria, which are mentioned in the archives. Most of the tablets, which date from that period, are about economic matters but also include royal letters and diplomatic documents. The written archives do not date from before
Igrish-Halam's reign, which saw Ebla paying tribute to Mari, and an extensive invasion of Eblaite cities in the middle Euphrates region led by the Mariote king
Iblul-Il. Ebla recovered under King
Irkab-Damu in about 2340 BC; becoming prosperous and launching a successful counter-offensive against Mari. Irkab-Damu concluded a peace and trading treaty with
Abarsal. This
Treaty between Ebla and Abarsal is one of the earliest-recorded treaties in history.
Geography At its greatest extent, Ebla controlled an area roughly half the size of modern Syria, from
Ursa'um in the north, to the area around
Damascus in the south, and from
Phoenicia and the
coastal mountains in the west, to
Haddu in the east. Large parts of the kingdom were under the direct control of the king and were administered by governors; the rest consisted of
vassal kingdoms. One of the most important of these vassals was
Armi, which is the city most often mentioned in the Ebla tablets. Ebla had more than sixty vassal kingdoms and city-states, including
Hazuwan,
Burman,
Emar,
Halabitu and
Salbatu. According to Archi, these are "the twelve Syrian cities long allied with Ebla that (presumably) assisted in some way during the expedition against Mari: NIrar, Ra’ak, Burman, Dub, Emar, Garmu, Lumnan, Ibubu,
Ursaum, Utik, Kakmium, and Iritum (
Irridu)." Furthermore, the following cities were under Ebla's hegemony at that time, and annually delivered tribute: Dub, Dulu,
Harran, Ibubu, Iritum, Kablul, Sanapzugum, Ursaum, and Utik. Modern scholars have termed the king's chief official "the
vizier". The most powerful vizier was
Ibrium, who campaigned against Abarsal during the term of his predecessor Arrukum. Ibrium held office for 18 years with warfare occurring in all but one year. During the reign of
Isar-Damu, Ebla continued the war against Mari, which defeated Ebla's ally
Nagar, blocking trade routes between Ebla and southern Mesopotamia via upper Mesopotamia. Ebla conducted regular military campaigns against rebellious vassals, including several attacks on Armi, and a campaign against the southern region of
Ib'al – close to
Qatna. In order to settle the war with Mari, Isar-Damu allied with Nagar and
Kish. Some scholars have suggested that the Kish in question was not the Mesopotamian city but rather a town near Nagar in the Khabur area. The campaign was headed by the Eblaite vizier
Ibbi-Sipish, who led the combined armies to victory in a battle near
Terqa. The alliance also attacked Armi and occupied it, leaving Ibbi-Sipish's son Enzi-Malik as governor. Ebla suffered its first destruction a few years after the campaign, probably following Isar-Damu's death.
First destruction of Ebla The first destruction occurred BC; palace "G" was burned, baking the clay tablets of the royal archives and preserving them. Many theories about the cause and the perpetrator have been posited: soldier of
Naram-Sin, with helmet and long sword, on the Nasiriyah stele. He carries a metal vessel of Anatolian type. From
Mesopotamia, Iraq, c. 2300 BC.
Iraq Museum. •
High (early) dating hypothesis:
Giovanni Pettinato supports an early dating for Ebla that would put the destruction at around 2500 BC. Pettinato, while preferring the date of 2500 BC, later accepted the event could have happened in 2400 BC. The scholar suggests the city was destroyed in 2400 BC by a Mesopotamian such as
Eannatum of Lagash – who boasted of taking tribute from Mari – or
Lugalzagesi of
Umma, who claimed to have reached the Mediterranean. •
Akkadian hypothesis: Both kings
Sargon of Akkad and his grandson
Naram-Sin claimed to have destroyed a town called Ibla, The discoverer of Ebla,
Paolo Matthiae, considers Sargon a more likely culprit; his view is supported by
Trevor Bryce, but rejected by
Michael Astour. The conquest of
Armanum and Ebla on the Mediterranean coast by Naram-Sin is mentioned in several of his inscriptions: • '''Mari's revenge''': According to
Alfonso Archi and
Maria Biga, the destruction happened approximately three or four years after the battle at Terqa. Archi and Biga say the destruction was caused by Mari in retaliation for its humiliating defeat at Terqa. This view is supported by
Mario Liverani. Archi says the Mariote king
Isqi-Mari destroyed Ebla before ascending the throne of his city. •
Natural catastrophe: Astour says a natural catastrophe caused the blaze which ended the archive period. He says the destruction was limited to the area of the royal palace and there is no convincing evidence of looting. He dates the fire to BC (
Middle Chronology).
Second kingdom The second kingdom's period is designated "Mardikh IIB2", and spans the period between 2300 and 2000 BC. The second kingdom lasted until Ebla's second destruction, which occurred anytime between 2050 and 1950 BC, with the 2000 BC dating being a mere formal date. The
Akkadians under
Sargon of Akkad and his descendant
Naram-Sin invaded the northern borders of Ebla aiming for the forests of the
Amanus Mountain; the intrusions were separated by roughly 90 years and the areas attacked were not attached to Akkad. Archi accept that the Ibla mentioned in the annals of Sargon and Naram-Sin is the Syrian Ebla but do not consider them responsible for the destruction which ended the Archive period. By the time of Naram-Sin, Armi was the hegemonic city in northern Syria and was destroyed by the Akkadian king. A new local dynasty ruled the second kingdom of Ebla, but there was continuity with its first kingdom heritage. Ebla maintained its earliest features, including its architectural style and the sanctity of the first kingdom's religious sites. A new royal palace was built in the lower town, and the transition from the archive period is marked only by the destruction of palace "G". Little is known about the second kingdom because no written material have been discovered aside from one inscription dating to the end of the period. The second kingdom was attested in contemporaneous sources; in an inscription,
Gudea of
Lagash asked for cedars to be brought from
Urshu in the mountains of Ebla, indicating Ebla's territory included Urshu north of
Carchemish in modern-day Turkey. Texts that dates to the seventh year of
Amar-Sin ( BC), a ruler of the
Ur III empire, mention a messenger of the
Ensí ("Megum") of Ebla. The second kingdom was considered a vassal by the
Ur III government, but the nature of the relation is unknown and it included the payment of tribute. A formal recognition of Ur's overlordship appears to be a condition for the right of trade with that empire. The second kingdom disintegrated toward the end of the and ended with the destruction of the city by fire, although evidence for the event has only been found outside of the so-called "Temple of the Rock", and in the area around palace "E" on the acropolis. Conflict may have preceded the fire; according to Astour, it could have been the result of a
Hurrian invasion BC, led by the former Eblaite vassal city of
Ikinkalis. The destruction of Ebla is mentioned in the fragmentary
Hurro-Hittite legendary epic "Song of Release" discovered in 1983, which Astour considers as describing the destruction of the second kingdom. In the epic, an Eblaite assembly led by a man called "Zazalla" prevents king
Meki from showing mercy to prisoners from Ebla's former vassal Ikinkalis, provoking the wrath of the Hurrian storm god
Teshub and causing him to destroy the city.
Middle Bronze Third kingdom . In the Middle Bronze Age, a third kingdom is designated "Mardikh III"; it is divided into periods "A" ( BC) and "B" ( BC). In period "A", Ebla was quickly rebuilt as a planned city. The foundations covered the remains of Mardikh II; new palaces and temples were built, and new fortifications were built in two circles – one for the low city and one for the acropolis. The city was laid out on regular lines and large public buildings were built. Further construction took place in period "B".
Middle Bronze I - Mardikh IIIA The first known king of the third kingdom is
Ibbit-Lim, who described himself as the Mekim of Ebla. A basalt votive statue bearing Ibbit-Lim's inscription was discovered in 1968; this helped to identify the site of Tell-Mardikh with the ancient kingdom Ebla. The name of the king is Amorite in the view of Pettinato; it is therefore probable the inhabitants of third kingdom Ebla were predominantly Amorites, as were most of the inhabitants of Syria at that time. • Meki (king) of Ebla Ibbit-Lim, son of Igrish-Kheb
Middle Bronze II - Mardikh IIIB During Middle Bronze IIA (MB IIA), Ebla Mardikh IIIB1 became a vassal of
Yamhad, an Amorite kingdom centered in Aleppo. Written records are not available for this period, but the city was still a vassal during
Yarim-Lim III of Yamhad's reign. One of the known rulers of Ebla during this period was
Immeya, who received gifts from the Egyptian Pharaoh
Hotepibre, indicating the continuing wide connections and importance of Ebla. The city was mentioned in tablets from the Yamhadite vassal city of
Alalakh in modern-day Turkey; an Eblaite princess married a son of King
Ammitaqum of Alalakh, who belonged to a branch of the royal
Yamhadite dynasty. In Middle Bronze IIB (MB IIB), the Great Kingdom of Yamhad under which Ebla Mardikh IIIB2 was a vassal declined due to climate change and raiding attacks by the Hittites (Hattusili I and Mursili I). Ebla was destroyed by the Hittite King in about 1600 BC.
Indilimma was probably the last king of Ebla; a seal of his crown prince Maratewari was discovered in the western palace "Q". Alternatively, Maratewari could well be the last king according to Archi, who also argued that the "Song of Release" epic describes the destruction of the third kingdom and preserves older elements.
Late Bronze Age Ebla never recovered from its third destruction. It was a small village in the phase designated "Mardikh IV" (1600–1200 BC). It was mentioned in the records of Alalakh as a vassal to the
Idrimi dynasty.
Iron Age and later "Mardikh V" (1200–535 BC) was a rural, Early
Iron Age settlement that grew in size during later periods. Further development occurred during "Mardikh VI", which lasted until AD. "Mardikh VII" began in the and lasted until the 7th century, after which the site was abandoned. ==Site==