Box office On its opening day,
The Fellowship of the Ring grossed $18.2 million in the United States and Canada from 3,359 cinemas and $11.5 million in 13 countries, including $3 million from 466 screens in the United Kingdom. It grossed $75.1 million in its first five days in the United States and Canada, including $47.2 million on its opening weekend, placing it at
number one at the US box office, setting a December opening record, beating ''
Ocean's Eleven''. It had a record opening weekend in Germany with 1.5 million admissions and in Spain with a gross of $5.3 million from 395 screens. It also grossed a record $2.5 million in 15 days in New Zealand. In Denmark, it became the country's highest-grossing film, surpassing
Titanic. In its first 15 days, the film had grossed $183.5 million internationally and $178.7 million in the United States and Canada for a worldwide total of $362.2 million. Following subsequent reissues, the film has grossed $326 million in the United States and Canada and $570 million in the rest of the world for a worldwide total of $897 million.
Critical response On
review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes,
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring holds an approval rating of 91% based on 269 reviews. The website's critics consensus reads, "Full of eye-popping special effects, and featuring a pitch-perfect cast,
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring brings J.R.R. Tolkien's classic to vivid life."
Metacritic, which uses a weighted average, assigned the film a score of 92 out of 100 based on 34 critics, indicating "universal acclaim". Audiences polled by
CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of "A−" on an A+ to F scale. Colin Kennedy for
Empire gave the film five stars out of five, writing "Brooking no argument, history should quickly regard Peter Jackson's
The Fellowship of the Ring as the first instalment of the best fantasy epic in motion picture history... Putting formula blockbusters to shame,
Fellowship is impeccably cast and constructed with both care and passion: this is a labour of love that never feels laboured. Emotional range and character depth ultimately take us beyond genre limitations..."
Roger Ebert of the
Chicago Sun-Times gave the film three out of four stars and stating that while it is not "a true visualization of Tolkien's Middle-earth", it is "a work for, and of, our times. It will be embraced, I suspect, by many Tolkien fans and will take on aspects of a cult. It is a candidate for many Oscars. It is an awesome production in its daring and breadth, and there are small touches that are just right".
USA Today also gave the film three out of four stars and wrote, "this movie version of a beloved book should please devotees as well as the uninitiated". In his review for
The New York Times,
Elvis Mitchell wrote, "The playful spookiness of Mr. Jackson's direction provides a lively, light touch, a gesture that doesn't normally come to mind when Tolkien's name is mentioned".
Lisa Schwarzbaum for
Entertainment Weekly gave the film an A grade and wrote "The cast take to their roles with becoming modesty, certainly, but Jackson also makes it easy for them: His
Fellowship flows, never lingering for the sake of admiring its own beauty ... Every detail of which engrossed me. I may have never turned a page of Tolkien, but I know enchantment when I see it". In his review for the
BBC, Nev Pierce gave the film four stars out of five, describing it as "Funny, scary, and totally involving", and wrote that Jackson turned "the book's least screen-worthy volume into a gripping and powerful adventure movie". In his review for
The Guardian, Xan Brooks wrote "Rather than a stand-alone holiday blockbuster,
The Fellowship of the Ring offers an epic act one", and commented that the ending was "closer in spirit to an art-house film than a popcorn holiday romp". In her review for
The Washington Post, Rita Kempley gave the film five stars out of five, and praised the cast, in particular, "Mortensen, as Strider, is a revelation, not to mention downright gorgeous. And McKellen, carrying the burden of thousands of years' worth of the fight against evil, is positively Merlinesque".
Time magazine's
Richard Corliss praised Jackson's work: "His movie achieves what the best fairy tales do: the creation of an alternate world, plausible and persuasive, where the young — and not only the young — can lose themselves. And perhaps, in identifying with the little Hobbit that could, find their better selves". In his review for
The Village Voice,
J. Hoberman wrote, "Peter Jackson's adaptation is certainly successful on its own terms".
Rolling Stone magazine's
Peter Travers wrote, "It's emotion that makes
Fellowship stick hard in the memory... Jackson deserves to revel in his success. He's made a three-hour film that leaves you wanting more". A mixed review was written by
Peter Bradshaw. Writing for
The Guardian, he lauded the art direction and the visual look of the film, but he also commented "there is a strange paucity of plot complication, an absence of anything unfolding, all the more disconcerting because of the clotted and indigestible mythic back story that we have to wade through before anything happens at all". Overall, Bradshaw found the tone of the film too serious and self-important, and wrote "signing up to the movie's whole hobbity-elvish universe requires a leap of faith... It's a leap I didn't feel much like making – and, with two more movie episodes like this on the way, the credibility gap looks wider than ever."
Jonathan Rosenbaum was also less positive about
The Fellowship of the Ring: in his review for the
Chicago Reader, he granted that the film was "full of scenic splendors with a fine sense of scale", but he commented that its narrative thrust seemed "relatively pro forma", and that he found the battle scenes boring.
Accolades In
2002, the film won four
Academy Awards from thirteen nominations. It won the 2002
Hugo Award for Best Dramatic Presentation. It won
Empire readers' Best Film award, as well as five
BAFTAs, including
Best Film, the
David Lean Award for
Best Direction, the Audience Award (voted for by the public),
Best Special Effects, and
Best Make-up. The film was nominated for an
MTV Movie Award for Best Fight between Gandalf and Saruman. In June 2008, AFI revealed its "
10 Top 10"—the ten best films in ten "classic" American film genres—after polling over 1,500 people from the creative community.
The Fellowship of the Ring was acknowledged as the second best film in the fantasy genre. In 2021, members of
Writers Guild of America West (WGAW) and
Writers Guild of America, East (WGAE) voted its screenplay 76th in WGA’s 101 Greatest Screenplays of the 21st Century (so far). In June 2025, it ranked number 87 on
The New York Times list of "The 100 Best Movies of the 21st Century" and number 14 on the "Readers' Choice" edition of the list. ==References==