The book's thesis has been labeled an
antisemitic canard by historians, including
Saul S. Friedman, who contends that Jews had a minimal role in the New World slave trade.
Henry Louis Gates Jr., head of the department of Afro-American studies at
Harvard University, called the book "the Bible of
new antisemitism" and added that "the book massively misinterprets the historical record, largely through a process of cunningly selective quotations of often reputable sources". Other black academics came forward to condemn the book.
Eugene Genovese, an American historian and expert on slavery, wrote that the book "rivals
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion in fantasy and gross distortion. The absurdity of its pretenses to scholarship are outweighed by its sheer viciousness. It must be taken with deadly seriousness as a transparent attempt to foment antisemitism, irrationality, and hatred, and to subvert intellectual discourse and common decency on our campuses." Wim Klooster noted that in "no period did Jews play a leading role as financiers, shipowners, or factors in the Transatlantic or Caribbean slave trades. They possessed far fewer slaves than non-Jews in every British and Spanish territory in
North America,
South America and the Caribbean. Even when Jews in a handful of places owned slaves in proportions slightly above their representation among a town's families, such cases do not come close to corroborating the assertions of The Secret Relationship." The book was criticized for being antisemitic and for failing to provide an objective analysis of the role of Jews in the slave trade. Common criticisms were that the book used selective quotes, made "crude use of statistics," Historian Ralph A. Austen criticized the book, saying that the "distortions are produced almost entirely by selective citation rather than explicit falsehood ... more frequently there are innuendos imbedded in the accounts of Jewish involvement in the slave trade," and "[w]hile we should not ignore the antisemitism of
The Secret Relationship..., we must recognize the legitimacy of the stated aim of examining fully and directly even the most uncomfortable elements in our [Black and Jewish] common past." In 1995, the
American Historical Association (AHA) issued a statement condemning "any statement alleging that Jews played a disproportionate role in the Atlantic slave trade." The publication of
The Secret Relationship spurred retorts published specifically to refute the thesis of
The Secret Relationship: • 1992 – Harold Brackman, ''Jew on the Brain: A Public Refutation of the Nation of Islam's The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews
. The booklet was published independently by Bill Adler, the former director of publicity for Def Jam Recordings, after learning that the rapper Ice Cube had endorsed The Secret Relationship''. In his foreword, Adler wrote, "I care way too much about black-Jewish relations – and particularly about black-Jewish relations in the rap community – to allow 'The Secret Relationship' to go unchallenged." The booklet's afterword was written by
Cornel West. It was republished that same year, minus its original foreword and afterword, as "Farrakhan's Reign of Historical Error: The Secret Relationship Between Blacks & Jews" by the
Simon Wiesenthal Center. In 1994, it was republished for a second time under the title "Ministry of Lies: the Truth Behind 'The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews'" by
Four Walls Eight Windows. • 1992 –
David Brion Davis, "Jews in the Slave Trade," in
Culturefront (Fall 1992) pp. 42–45. • 1993 –
Seymour Drescher, "The Role of Jews in the Atlantic Slave Trade,"
Immigrants and Minorities, 12 (1993), pp. 113–125. • 1993 – Marc Caplan, ''Jew-Hatred As History: An Analysis of the Nation of Islam's "The Secret Relationship"'' (Published by the
Anti Defamation League). • 1998 –
Eli Faber,
Jews, Slaves, and the Slave Trade: Setting the Record Straight, New York University Press. Holocaust historian
Deborah Lipstadt called the book the "African American-oriented version" of
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Legal historian
Paul Finkelman states that the central thesis of the book is "ludicrous and considered absurd by all serious scholars." Historian
Glenn C. Altschuler and Robert Summers called
The Secret Relationship a "compendium of conspiracy theories."
Classics scholar
Mary Lefkowitz called the book "hate literature" and wrote: "The authors of
The Secret Relationship continually misquote Jewish sources, taking quotations out of context, or citing as support works that actually say the opposite of what they are claiming. They make a number of claims that are impossible to substantiate, such as that Jews (rather than Arabs) dominated the transatlantic slave trade; that they were the dominant slave traders and holders in the South; that they raped black women; that they infected Native Americans with smallpox...The known facts about the slave trade give a completely different picture of the level of Jewish participation."
Seymour Drescher who analyzed the role of Jews in the overall Atlantic slave trade concluded that it was "minimal," and only identified certain regions (such as
Brazil and the
Caribbean) where the participation was "significant." == Authorship ==