MarketThe Washington Free Beacon
Company Profile

The Washington Free Beacon

The Washington Free Beacon is an American political journalism website launched in 2012. The website identifies as conservative but is affiliated with the neoconservatism of the Republican Party. Eliana Johnson is the website's editor-in-chief.

Overview
The Free Beacon was founded by Michael Goldfarb, Aaron Harison, and Matthew Continetti. It launched on February 7, 2012, as a project of the Center for American Freedom, a conservative advocacy group modeled on the liberal Center for American Progress. The website is financially backed by Paul Singer, an American billionaire hedge fund manager and Republican donor. The site is known for its conservative reporting, with the intention to publicize stories and influence the coverage of the mainstream media, and is modeled after liberal counterparts in the media such as Think Progress and Talking Points Memo. The site has roots in the neoconservative wing of the Republican Party. In 2019, Politico journalist Eliana Johnson assumed the editor-in-chief position from the WFBs founding editor Matthew Continetti. At the time, the outlet had 24 staffers. ==Reporting==
Reporting
Jack Hunter, a staff member of Senator Rand Paul's office, resigned in 2013 after a Free Beacon report detailed his past as a pro-secessionist radio shock jock known as the "Southern Avenger". From October 2015 to May 2016, The Free Beacon hired Fusion GPS to conduct opposition research on "multiple candidates" during the 2016 presidential election, including Donald Trump. The Free Beacon stopped funding this research when Trump clinched the Republican nomination. Fusion GPS later hired former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele and produced the Steele dossier that alleged links between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin. Paul Singer, a major donor to the Free Beacon, said he was unaware of this dossier until BuzzFeed News published it in January 2017. On October 27, 2017, the Free Beacon publicly disclosed that it had hired Fusion GPS, and said that it "had no knowledge of or connection to the Steele dossier, did not pay for the dossier, and never had contact with, knowledge of, or provided payment for any work performed by Christopher Steele". The Free Beacon came under criticism for its reporting on Fusion GPS. Three days before it was revealed that the Free Beacon had funded the work by Fusion GPS, the Free Beacon wrote that the firm's work "was funded by an unknown GOP client while the primary was still going on." The Free Beacon has published pieces portraying Fusion GPS's work as unreliable "without noting that it considered Fusion GPS reliable enough to pay for its services". In 2022, a Free Beacon article by Patrick Hauf accused President Joe Biden's administration of planning to use federal dollars to fund safe smoking kits that included crack pipes as part of a harm reduction initiative; this prompted outrage among Republicans in Congress, some of whom proposed a bill to ban the federal government from funding drug paraphernalia. Bill Gertz, a senior editor until October 2019, took $100,000 from Guo Wengui, a conspiracy theorist, without disclosure, wrote stories citing him, and introduced him to Steve Bannon. Gertz was subsequently fired, with a disclaimer appended to his affected stories. and subsequently expanding on, the plagiarism accusations against Harvard President Claudine Gay, who resigned shortly thereafter. The Washington Post called Gay's resignation "a major win" for the Free Beacon, which it called "the rare conservative media outlet that does significant reporting of its own". In May 2024, the Free Beacon reported that the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA had continued to evaluate applicants based on race rather than qualifications despite the illegality of race-based affirmative action in California since 1996. According to the outlet's reporting, 50% of UCLA medical students now fail basic tests of medical competence. A former admissions staff member called UCLA a "failed medical school". On July 3, 2024, the Free Beacon reported that a number of senior administrators at Columbia University had exchanged text messages demeaning members of a panel on Jewish life on campus after the 2024 Columbia University pro-Palestinian campus occupations. In August 2024, three deans resigned in the wake of that reporting. == Reception ==
Reception
Jim Rutenberg of The New York Times described the reporting style of the Free Beacon as "gleeful evisceration". The Atlantics Conor Friedersdorf called the Free Beacons mission "decadent and unethical". Ben Howe wrote in The Daily Beast that The Washington Free Beacon established "itself as a credible source of conservative journalism with deep investigative dives and exposes on money in politics", but after Trump's election it was "producing less actual reporting" and moved "more towards the path of least resistance: spending their time criticizing the left and the media, along with healthy doses of opinion writing". McKay Coppins in the Columbia Journalism Review wrote in September 2018 that while the website contains "a fair amount of trolling… it has also earned a reputation for real-deal journalism… If a partisan press really is the future, we could do worse than the Free Beacon". Jeet Heer wrote in The New Republic: "Much of the conservative press is terrible but the Free Beacon is far superior to propagandist fare like The Daily Caller. Unlike other comparable conservative websites, the Free Beacon makes an effort to do original reporting. Its commitment to journalism should be welcomed by liberals". In 2015, Mother Jones wrote that the Free Beacon was far better than contemporary conservative outlets such as The Daily Caller but that "the Beacon hasn't always steered clear of stories that please the base but don't really stand up", and that it tends towards inflammatory pieces that "push conservatives' buttons". That same year, the Washingtonian wrote that "The Beacons emphasis on newsgathering sets it apart among right-facing publications". Ben Smith wrote in BuzzFeed News that the Free Beacon was "[a]lternately parodic and wire-service serious", and had "broken major political news, mostly negative" (although its focus was mainly directed against Democrats). Smith continued that the Free Beacons hard news reporting differentiated it from other conservative outlets which were either opinion focused or did not produce journalism which met mainstream standards. Politico Magazine reported that it is "somewhat grudgingly respected in liberal circles." ==See also==
tickerdossier.comtickerdossier.substack.com