Western attitudes have traditionally been negative, not towards divinization itself (which is also part of the doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church), but towards the ways in which divinization is supposed to happen according to Byzantine theology. In his article, Bloor highlights various Western theologians who have contributed to what he calls a "stigma" towards
theosis. Yet, recent theological discourse has seen a reversal of this, with Bloor drawing upon Western theologians from an array of traditions, who, he claims, embrace
theosis/deification. The practice of ascetic prayer, called
Hesychasm in the
Eastern Orthodox Church and
Byzantine Catholic Churches, “is centered on the enlightenment or deification (... or
theosis, in Greek) of man”. Hesychasm is directed to a goal that is not limited to natural life alone and goes beyond this to deification (
theosis). In the past, Roman Catholic theologians generally expressed a negative view of
Hesychasm. The doctrine of
Gregory Palamas won almost no following in the West, and the distrustful attitude of
Barlaam in its regard prevailed among Western theologians, surviving into the early 20th century, as shown in
Adrian Fortescue's article on hesychasm in the 1910
Catholic Encyclopedia. Fortescue translated the Greek words and as "quiet" and "quietist". In the same period, Edward Pace's article on
quietism indicated that, while in the strictest sense quietism is a 17th-century doctrine proposed by
Miguel de Molinos, the term is also used more broadly to cover both Indian religions and what Edward Pace called "the vagaries of Hesychasm", thus betraying the same prejudices as Fortescue with regard to hesychasm; and, again in the same period, Siméon Vailhé described some aspects of the teaching of Palamas as "monstrous errors", "heresies" and "a resurrection of polytheism", and called the hesychast method for arriving at perfect
contemplation "no more than a crude form of
auto-suggestion". Different concepts of "natural contemplation" existed in the East and in the medieval West. The twentieth century saw a remarkable change in the attitude of Roman Catholic theologians to Palamas, a "rehabilitation" of him that has led to increasing parts of the Western Church considering him a saint, even if uncanonized. Some Western scholars maintain that there is no conflict between Palamas's teaching and Roman Catholic thought. According to G. Philips, the
essence–energies distinction is "a typical example of a perfectly admissible theological pluralism" that is compatible with the Roman Catholic magisterium. Jeffrey D. Finch claims that "the future of East–West rapprochement appears to be overcoming the modern polemics of neo-scholasticism and neo-Palamism". Some Western theologians have incorporated the theology of Palamas into their own thinking.
Pope John Paul II said Catholics should be familiar with "the venerable and ancient tradition of the Eastern Churches", so as to be nourished by it. Among the treasures of that tradition he mentioned in particular: Some Lutherans argue that
theosis is compatible with Lutheran theology. ==See also==