Opening night The première was under rehearsed, as several critics noted, and the work was also evidently in need of cutting: Gaiety management had advised that carriages should be called for 11:00 p.m., but
Thespis was still playing past midnight.
The Orchestra reported that "scarcely one player... was more than 'rough perfect' in his part."
The Observer commented that "the acting, as well as the business, will want working up before it can be fairly criticized... the opera... was not ready". The
Daily Telegraph suggested that "It is more satisfactory for many reasons to look upon the performance last evening as a full dress rehearsal.... When
Thespis ends at the orthodox Gaiety closing hour, and the opera has been energetically rehearsed, few happier entertainments will be found." Some critics could not see past the production's state of disarray. The
Hornet captioned its review, "Thespis; or, the Gods Grown Old and WEARISOME!" But others found much to admire in the work, despite the poor opening performance. The
Illustrated Times wrote:
Clement Scott, writing in the
Daily Telegraph, had a mostly favourable reaction:
The Observer commented: "[W]e have authors and musicians quite as talented as [the French]. ... The subject of
Thespis is unquestionably funny. ... Mr. Arthur Sullivan has entered with heart into the spirit of Mr. Gilbert's fun, he has brightened it up with the most fanciful and delightful music". In fact, it remained open until 8 March. Of the nine London pantomimes that appeared during the 1871–72 holiday season, five closed before
Thespis did. By its nature, the genre did not lend itself to long runs, and all nine had closed by the end of March. Moreover, the Gaiety normally only ran productions for two or three weeks; the run of
Thespis was extraordinary for the theatre. The piece eventually settled into a respectable state, and later critics were much more enthusiastic than those on opening night. Reporting on the opera's third night, a letter in the
London Figaro stated: "[N]ot a single hitch in the performance is now to be perceived, and ... the applause and evident delight of the audience from beginning to end ... fully endorses the opinion of the
Telegraph critic". On 6 January 1872, the
Penny Illustrated Paper commented that "Mr. Gilbert's Gaiety extravaganza grows in public favour and deservedly so". On 9 January, the
Daily Telegraph reported a visit by His Royal Highness, the
Duke of Edinburgh. By 27 January, the
Illustrated Times noted that "a chance playgoer will certainly not find a seat at the Gaiety....
Thespis can, after all, boast the success which was predicted".
Land and Water reported on 3 February that "Thespis is now in capital working order." Performances of
Thespis were interrupted on 14 February 1872,
Ash Wednesday, since London theatres refrained from presenting costumed performances out of respect for the religious holiday. Instead, a "miscellaneous entertainment" was given at the Gaiety, consisting of ventriloquists, performing dogs and, coincidentally, a sketch parodying a
penny reading by the young
George Grossmith, who, several years later, became Gilbert and Sullivan's principal comedian. On 17 February,
Henry Sutherland Edwards wrote in the
Musical World: "In almost all conjunctions of music and words, there is a sacrifice of one to the other; but in
Thespis... Sufficient opportunities have been given for music; and the music serves only to adorn the piece." The actress was a Gaiety favourite, "not only in respect of her voice but also her delicious French accent and, of course, her figure." Others recalled "the charm of Mlle. Clary, with her pretty face and piquant broken English". She had been particularly successful as Sparkeion, and her song in Act II, "Little Maid of Arcadee", was the only one chosen for publication.
Aftermath After the production of
Thespis, Gilbert and Sullivan went their separate ways, reuniting three years later, with
Richard D'Oyly Carte as their manager, to produce
Trial by Jury in 1875. When that work was a surprise success, there were discussions of quickly reviving
Thespis for the 1875 Christmas season. Gilbert wrote to Sullivan: The proposed revival was mentioned in several more letters throughout the autumn of 1875, until on 23 November Gilbert wrote, "I have heard no more about
Thespis. It is astonishing how quickly these capitalists dry up under the magic influence of the words 'cash down'." In 1895, with Richard D'Oyly Carte struggling to rediscover success at the Savoy, he once again proposed a revival of
Thespis, but the idea was not pursued. No mention of the whereabouts of the music of
Thespis exists since 1897, and scholars have searched for it among many of the extant collections. Except for two songs and some ballet music, it is presumed lost. If this were true, then "for this reason alone a revival would have become impossible". However, evidence that Sullivan did so has eluded discovery. Another possible explanation is that Gilbert and Sullivan came to regard
Thespis, with its "brazen girls in tights and short skirts", In 1879, Sullivan, Gilbert and Carte were in the midst of a legal battle with the former directors of the
Comedy Opera Company, which had produced
H.M.S. Pinafore. Sullivan wrote to Hollingshead, saying: "You once settled a precedent for me which may just at present be of great importance to me. I asked you for the band parts of the
Merry Wives of Windsor... and [you] said, 'They are yours, as our run is over....' Now will you please let me have them, and the parts of
Thespis also at once. I am detaining the parts of
Pinafore, so that the directors shall not take them away from the
Comique tomorrow, and I base my claim on the precedent
you set."
Modern productions After its last performance at the Gaiety in 1872,
Thespis appears to have remained unperformed until 1953, although an attempted reconstruction from the 1940s has been discovered. Tillett and Spencer, who discovered the ballet music, identified twenty separate reconstructions of
Thespis between 1953 and 2002. About half of these use music adapted from Sullivan's other works; the others use new music for all but the surviving songs, or, in a few cases, re-compose those as well. No version has become predominant in recent productions. Theatre historian
Terence Rees developed a version of the libretto that attempts to correct the many errors noted in the surviving libretto. Rees also prepared a performance version, based on the libretto, which included a few interpolated lyrics from Gilbert's non-Sullivan operas in an attempt to replace the missing songs. A score was supplied by Garth Morton, based on music from lesser-known Sullivan operas, and this version has been recorded. A version with an original score by
Bruce Montgomery (other than the two Sullivan numbers) has been performed several times, including in 2000 at the
International Gilbert and Sullivan Festival. An original 1982 score by Kingsley Day has been used in several Chicago-area stagings. In 1996, another version with new music, by
Quade Winter, was produced by the
Ohio Light Opera. In 2008, a Sullivan pastiche score (with some
Offenbach added), arranged by Timothy Henty, was first used with Gilbert's libretto adapted by Anthony Baker, at the
Normansfield Theatre in
Teddington,
Middlesex, England, the first professional British production since 1872. This was performed several times subsequently, including at the 2014 International Gilbert and Sullivan Festival. Also in 2008, an original score by
Thomas Z. Shepard was first performed in concert by the
Blue Hill Troupe in New York City and was finally given a fully staged amateur production in 2014. ==Assessment==