The Liberal historian
Lord Acton read Macaulay's
History of England four times and later described himself as "a raw English schoolboy, primed to the brim with Whig politics" but "not
Whiggism only, but Macaulay in particular that I was so full of." However, Acton would later find fault in Macaulay. In 1880 Acton classed Macaulay (with
Burke and
Gladstone) as one "of the three greatest Liberals". In 1883, he advised
Mary Gladstone: In 1885, Acton asserted that: In 1888, Acton wrote that Macaulay "had done more than any writer in the literature of the world for the propagation of the Liberal faith, and he was not only the greatest, but the most representative, Englishman then living".
W. S. Gilbert described Macaulay's wit, "who wrote of
Queen Anne" as part of Colonel Calverley's Act I patter song in the libretto of the 1881 operetta
Patience. (This line may well have been a joke about the Colonel's pseudo-intellectual bragging, as most educated Victorians knew that Macaulay did
not write of Queen Anne; the
History encompasses only as far as the death of William III in 1702, who was succeeded by Anne.)
Herbert Butterfield's
The Whig Interpretation of History (1931) attacked Whig history. The Dutch historian
Pieter Geyl, writing in 1955, considered Macaulay's
Essays as "exclusively and intolerantly English". On 7 February 1954,
Lord Moran, doctor to the Prime Minister, Sir
Winston Churchill, recorded in his diary: Churchill wrote in
his autobiography that he "accepted all Macaulay wrote as gospel".
George Richard Potter, Professor and Head of the Department of History at the
University of Sheffield from 1931 to 1965, stated "In an age of long letters ... Macaulay's hold their own with the best". However Potter also stated: With regards to Macaulay's determination to inspect physically the places mentioned in his
History, Potter said: Potter noted that Macaulay has had many critics, some of whom put forward some salient points about the deficiency of Macaulay's
History but added: "The severity and the minuteness of the criticism to which the
History of England has been subjected is a measure of its permanent value. It is worth every ounce of powder and shot that is fired against it." Potter concluded that "in the long roll of English historical writing from
Clarendon to
Trevelyan only
Gibbon has surpassed him in security of reputation and certainty of immortality".
Piers Brendon wrote that Macaulay is "the only British rival to Gibbon." In 1972, J.R. Western wrote that: "Despite its age and blemishes, Macaulay's
History of England has still to be superseded by a full-scale modern history of the period." In 1974
J. P. Kenyon stated that: "As is often the case, Macaulay had it exactly right."
W. A. Speck wrote in 1980, that a reason Macaulay's
History of England "still commands respect is that it was based upon a prodigious amount of research". Speck stated: According to Speck: On the other hand, Speck also wrote that Macaulay "took pains to present the virtues even of a rogue, and he painted the virtuous warts and all", and that "he was never guilty of suppressing or distorting evidence to make it support a proposition which he knew to be untrue". Speck concluded: In 1981,
J. W. Burrow argued that Macaulay's
History of England: In 1982,
Gertrude Himmelfarb wrote: Himmelfarb also laments that "the history of the
History is a sad testimonial to the cultural regression of our times". In the novel
Marathon Man and its
film adaptation, the protagonist was named 'Thomas Babington' after Macaulay.
The Quarrel of Croker and Macaulay, by historian
William Thomas (published in 2000), studies the relationship between the Anglo-Irish politician and author John Wilson
Croker and Macaulay. In 2008,
Walter Olson argued for the pre-eminence of Macaulay as a British
classical liberal. ==Works==