Dying out on the Australian mainland Australia lost more than 90% of
its megafauna around 50–40,000 years ago as part of the
Quaternary extinction event, with the notable exceptions of several kangaroo and wombat species, emus, cassowaries, large
goannas, and the thylacine. The extinctions included the even larger carnivore
Thylacoleo carnifex (sometimes called the marsupial lion) which was only distantly related to the thylacine. The youngest radiocarbon dates of the thylacine in mainland Australia are around 3,500 years old, with an estimated extinction date around 3,200 years ago, synchronous with that of Tasmanian devil, and closely co-inciding with the earliest records of the
dingo, as well as an intensification of human activity. Recent studies have documented additional thylacine depictions in
Arnhem Land, including examples in rock art styles that may date to within the last 1,000 years, raising questions about whether the species may have persisted locally later than previously assumed, although this remains uncertain. A study proposes that the dingo may have led to the extinction of the thylacine in mainland Australia because the dingo outcompeted the thylacine in preying on the
Tasmanian nativehen. The dingo is also more likely to hunt in packs than the more solitary thylacine. Examinations of dingo and thylacine skulls show that although the dingo had a weaker bite, its skull could resist greater stresses, allowing it to pull down larger prey than the thylacine. Because it was a
hypercarnivore, the thylacine was less versatile in its diet than the omnivorous
dingo. Their ranges appear to have overlapped because thylacine
subfossil remains have been discovered near those of dingoes. Aside from wild dingoes, the adoption of the dingo as a hunting companion by the indigenous peoples would have put the thylacine under increased pressure. A report published in the
Journal of Biogeography detailed an investigation into the
mitochondrial DNA and radio-carbon dating of thylacine bones. It concluded that the thylacine died out on mainland Australia in a relatively short time span. A study published in 2025 proposed that gene losses which accumulated throughout the thylacine's evolutionary history made the species more susceptible to extinction. The authors of the study suggest that genetic traits which would have made the thylacine more capable of adapting to environmental changes were lost and that these losses may have contributed the their eventual demise. Ken Mulvaney has suggested, based on the high number of rock carvings of the thylacine on the
Burrup Peninsula, Aboriginal Australians were aware of, and concerned about the thylacine's dwindling numbers around that time.
Dying out on Tasmania Although the thylacine had died out on mainland Australia, it survived into the 1930s on the island of
Tasmania. At the time of the first European settlement, the heaviest distributions were in the northeast, northwest and north-midland regions of the state. Aside from persecution, it is likely that multiple factors rapidly compounded its decline and eventual extinction, including competition with wild dogs introduced by European settlers, erosion of its habitat, already-low genetic diversity, the concurrent extinction or decline of prey species, and a
distemper-like disease that affected many captive specimens at the time. A study from 2012 suggested that the disease was likely introduced by humans, and that it was also present in the wild population. The marsupi-carnivore disease, as it became known, dramatically reduced the lifespan of the animal and greatly increased pup mortality. A 1921 photo by
Henry Burrell of a thylacine with a chicken was widely distributed and may have helped secure the animal's reputation as a poultry thief. The image had been cropped to hide the fact that the animal was in captivity, and analysis by one researcher has concluded that this thylacine was a
dead specimen, posed for the camera. The photograph may even have involved
photo manipulation. The animal had become extremely rare in the wild by the late 1920s. Despite the fact that the thylacine was believed by many to be responsible for attacks on sheep, in 1928 the Tasmanian Advisory Committee for Native Fauna recommended a reserve similar to the
Savage River National Park to protect any remaining thylacines, with potential sites of suitable habitat including the
Arthur-
Pieman area of western Tasmania. By the beginning of the 20th century, the increasing rarity of thylacines led to increased demand for captive specimens by zoos around the world, placing yet more pressure on an already small population. Despite the export of breeding pairs, attempts at rearing thylacines in captivity were unsuccessful, and the last thylacine outside Australia died at the
London Zoo in 1931. The last known thylacine to be killed in the wild was shot in 1930 by Wilf Batty, a farmer from
Mawbanna in the state's northwest. The animal, believed to have been a male, had been seen around Batty's house for several weeks. Work in 2012 examined the relationship of the genetic diversity of the thylacines before their extinction. The results indicated that the last of the thylacines in Tasmania had limited genetic diversity due to their complete geographic isolation from mainland Australia. Further investigations in 2017 showed evidence that this decline in genetic diversity started long before the arrival of humans in Australia, possibly starting as early as 70–120 thousand years ago. The thylacine held the status of
endangered species until the 1980s. International standards at the time stated that an animal could not be declared extinct until 50 years had passed without a confirmed record. Since no definitive proof of the thylacine's existence in the wild had been obtained for more than 50 years, it met that official criterion and was declared extinct by the
International Union for Conservation of Nature in 1982 and by the Tasmanian government in 1986. The species was removed from Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (
CITES) in 2013.
Last of the species in 1933 The last captive thylacine, lived as an
endling (the known last of its species) at
Hobart Zoo until its death on the night of 7 September 1936. The animal was captured by Elias Churchill with a
snare trap and was sold to the zoo in May 1936. The sale was not publicly announced because the use of traps was illegal and Churchill could have been fined. In May 1968, an individual named Frank Darby, claiming to be a curator at the Hobart Zoo, invented the myth that the endling was called Benjamin. Darby discussed the matter with the Victorian naturalist
Graham Pizzey, and the account entered the Melbourne press and exploded in popularity. Despite being regularly debunked over the years due to Darby never working at the zoo and clearly being unfamiliar with the species, the myth continues to circulate even in modern-day media, with Wikipedia itself repeating the invention. According to researchers Robert Paddle and Kathryn Medlock, the Hobart zoo thylacine was in fact a female. According to Paddle, the animal is believed to have died as the result of neglect—locked out of its sheltered sleeping quarters, it was exposed to a rare occurrence of extreme Tasmanian weather: extreme heat during the day and freezing temperatures at night. Linnard argues that it died of old age rather than neglect, due to its valued status in the zoo's collection. In the film footage, the thylacine is seen seated, walking around the perimeter of its enclosure, yawning, sniffing the air, scratching itself (in the same manner as a dog), and lying down. Fleay was bitten on the buttock whilst shooting the film. Although there had been a
conservation movement pressing for the thylacine's protection since 1901, driven in part by the increasing difficulty in obtaining specimens for overseas collections, political difficulties prevented any form of protection coming into force until 1936. Official protection of the species by the Tasmanian government came all too late; it was introduced on 10 July 1936, 59 days before the last known specimen died in captivity.
Searches and unconfirmed sightings Between 1967 and 1973, zoologist
Jeremy Griffith and dairy farmer James Malley conducted what is regarded as the most intensive search for thylacines ever carried out, including exhaustive surveys along Tasmania's west coast, installation of automatic camera stations, prompt investigations of claimed sightings, and in 1972 the creation of the Thylacine Expeditionary Research Team with Dr.
Bob Brown, which concluded without finding any evidence of the thylacine's existence. The
Department of Conservation and Land Management recorded 203 reports of sightings of the thylacine in Western Australia from 1936 to 1998. According to the
Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, there have been eight unconfirmed thylacine sighting reports between 2016 and 2019, with the latest unconfirmed visual sighting on 25 February 2018. Since the disappearance and effective extinction of the thylacine, speculation and searches for a living specimen have become a topic of interest to some members of the
cryptozoology subculture. The search for the animal has been the subject of books and articles, with many reported sightings that are largely regarded as dubious. A 2023 study published by
Brook et al. compiles many of the alleged sightings of thylacines in Tasmania throughout the 20th century and claims that, contrary to beliefs that the thylacine went extinct in the 1930s, the Tasmanian thylacine may have actually lasted throughout the 20th century, with a window of extinction between the 1980s and the present day and the likely extinction date being between the late 1990s and early 2000s. In 1983, the American
media mogul Ted Turner offered a $100,000 reward for proof of the continued existence of the thylacine. In March 2005, Australian news magazine
The Bulletin, as part of its 125th anniversary celebrations, offered a $1.25 million reward for the safe capture of a live thylacine. When the offer closed at the end of June 2005, no one had produced any evidence of the animal's existence. An offer of $1.75 million has subsequently been offered by a Tasmanian tour operator, Stewart Malcolm. == Research ==