Transportation and traffic planning for
Greater Bombay (now
Mumbai) was commissioned to
Wilbur Smith and Associates (WSA) (now (
CDM Smith) in mid-1962. The firm's report, based on extensive studies conducted over 18 months, was handed over to the
Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) on 19 December 1963. Among other projects, the report proposed the construction of a sea link, known as the Uran Bridge, to connect Mumbai with the mainland near the town of
Uran. However, WSA was unsure of the link's feasibility. Citing poor traffic expectations in Uran even in 1981, WSA's report advised a more detailed study of this connection and recommended to delay the link until development and community services are expanded in the Trans-
Thane region. In 1973, the
Vashi Bridge linking
Mankhurd in Mumbai with
Vashi in
Navi Mumbai was opened.
First attempt The first concrete attempt to build the sea link was made in 2004, when
Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services (IL&FS) submitted a proposal to implement the project on a
build, own, operate, and transfer (BOOT) basis. The
Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation (MSRDC) also submitted a counter-proposal. However, the IL&FS proposal was sidelined by the
Government of Maharashtra for undisclosed reasons.
Second attempt Another attempt was made in 2005, when the MSRDC invited bids for the project. The bids submitted by the
Ambani brothers were considered to be unrealistic. A consortium of the
Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group,
Reliance Energy (REL), and
Hyundai Engineering & Construction quoted a concession period of nine years and 11 months, against 75 years quoted by
Mukesh Ambani's Sea King Infrastructure (the only other shortlisted bidder left, after
Larsen & Toubro-
Gammon and
IFFCO opted out). The REL-Hyundai consortium was initially disqualified at the technical bid stage, as Hyundai did not meet the criteria of $200 million net worth specified in the bid document. However, the consortium challenged the disqualification in the
Supreme Court, and the Court granted them 90 days to submit their bid that ended on 15 December 2007. The consortium eventually won the bid in February 2008. However, the MSRDC was not sure about the viability of the low concession period. The MSRDC felt that the concession periods were "unrealistic" and that both bids "seemed frivolous in nature".
Fourth attempt The MMRDA appointed
Arup Consultancy Engineers and
KPMG to conduct the techno-economic feasibility study of the MTHL in August 2011. The project received clearance from the then
Chief Minister of Maharashtra,
Prithviraj Chavan, on 22 October 2012.
The Times of India described the MTHL's delay as being "symbolic of all that is wrong with infrastructure planning and implementation in Mumbai." The newspaper daily also stated that a project being "on the drawing board after more than forty years would be in the realm of fiction in any other country". The project received environmental clearance from the
Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) on 23 October 2012. The
Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation (MSRDC) had obtained clearance for the project in March 2005, but the certificate was valid only for 5 years and lapsed due to the delays in the bidding process. The ministry laid down 11 conditions that the MMRDA had to follow. Some of the conditions were that the MMRDA had to put up noise barriers, replant five times the number of mangroves destroyed, not carry out dredging or reclamation, use construction equipment with exhaust silencers, and work in consultation with the
Bombay Natural History Society to minimize the impact on migratory birds. Environmental activists were opposed to the clearance. They pointed out that there was no public hearing following the second application for environmental clearance. They still believe that the sea link is not allowed as per the new
Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) notification of 2011. They also claim that the sea link would damage a huge mudflat and mangrove tract towards
Sewri and
Nhava Sheva, which is a habitat for migratory birds like flamingos. Nevertheless, the MMRDA finalised the plan to construct sound barriers on the bridge so that it does not affect the flamingo habitat at Sewri. The
Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) had directed MMRDA to construct a six-km long view barrier to cut the view of
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC). The MTHL received coastal regulation zone clearance from the MoEFCC on 19 July 2013. On 31 October 2012, the
Department of Economic Affairs (DEA) granted in-principle approval for the MTHL. The DEA recommended granting with a concession period of 35 years for the project. In the first meeting, between MMRDA and DEA officials in September 2012, the ministry had asked the authority to treat the sea link as a road and reduce the proposed concession period from 45 years to 30 years. They also expected an internal rate of return of 15% for the project. However, the MMRDA wanted a higher rate as they claimed the project was very risky. An internal rate of return of 17% was agreed upon. The termination clause in the concession agreement comes into effect after 30 years into the concession period. The MMRDA can invoke the clause based on certain conditions, such as the capacity being higher than expected. The conditions will be reviewed in the 20th year of the concession agreement. The DEA is the first tier of the three-tier clearance process to get
viability gap funding (VGF) for the project. The project must also receive approval from an empowered committee and finally from the
Finance Minister. The empowered committee approved VGF for MTHL on 12 December 2012. The then Finance Minister,
P. Chidambaram, cleared the project on 18 January 2013. The
Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust (JNPT) asked the MMRDA to build the MTHL at a height of 51 metres, instead of the proposed 25 metres, for a span of 300 metres to accommodate its expansion plans for its fifth container terminal and to allow safe passage of bigger vessels. MMRDA expressed that a height of 51 metres would not be feasible as it would have a huge impact on the cost. However, MMRDA officials expressed willingness to raise the height of the bridge to 31–35 metres. On 8 January 2012, the then
Minister of Shipping and
MP from
South Mumbai,
Milind Murli Deora, told reporters that JNPT would issue a
No Objection Certificate (NOC) to the state government to go ahead with the project. In May 2012, the MMRDA shortlisted five consortia for the project:
Cintra-SOMA-Srei,
Gammon Infrastructure Projects Ltd.-
OHL, Concessions-
G.S. Engineering,
GMR Infrastructure-
L&T Ltd.-
Samsung C&T Corporation,
IRB Infrastructure Developers Ltd.-
Hyundai, and
Tata Realty and Infrastructure Ltd.-
Autostrade Indian Infrastructure Development Pvt. Ltd.-
Vinci Concessions Development Pvt. Ltd. None of the five shortlisted firms bid for the project by the deadline, which was extended to 5 August. IRB-Hyundai announced their withdrawal from the bidding process, on 31 July 2013, citing "the government's apathy and unfriendly attitude towards investors wanting to develop capital-intensive infrastructure projects". Following the failure of the tender, the MMRDA decided to abandon the PPP model and instead implement the project on cash contract basis. In January 2013, the
Government of India had sanctioned , which was 20% of the project cost at the time, for the viability gap for the MTHL. Under the public private partnership (PPP) basis that the project was proposed to be implemented in, the state government would also contribute the same amount as the centre, while the remaining 60% would have been borne by the developer who won the bid. However, the consortia shortlisted for the project were concerned that 15–20% of the projected traffic for the MTHL, was due to the proposed and now under-construction
Navi Mumbai International Airport, which was heavily delayed. The MMRDA added a provision for a shortfall loan to be made available from the central government if traffic is 20% under the estimate. In June 2014,
Business Line reported that Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust authorities had agreed to pick up a stake in the project. -
Sewri mudflats The project ran into a major hurdle in April 2015, when the forest advisory committee (FAC) of the MoEFCC withheld its clearance for the project, stating that it would affect the existing mangroves as well as the flamingo population. The project requires clearance from the ministry as it will affect 38 hectares of protected mangrove forests and 8.8 hectares of forest land on the Navi Mumbai end. The sea link's starting point poses a threat to an estimated 20,000–30,000 lesser and greater flamingos and the mangrove habitat. The Sewri mudflats are home to 150 species of birds, and are listed as an "Important Bird Area". The FAC instructed the state government to submit a study report on the project's impact on the flamingo population, and recommended that the government seek the help of either the
Bombay Natural History Society (BNHS) or the
Wildlife Institute of India,
Dehradun, to conduct the study. The cost of the study would be borne by the MMRDA, which would also have to come with safeguards to cause the least disturbance to the flamingos at Sewri. On 17 April 2015, the Minister of Road Transport and Highways,
Nitin Gadkari, stated that he favoured the construction of a submarine tunnel instead of a sea link. Gadkari stated that the tunnel would cost less than a bridge (citing the example of the
tunnel in Belgium), and would also be aesthetically preferable as a sea link would obstruct the city's coastline. However, Gadkari clarified that the
Government of India would accept the final decision made by the state government on this matter. Following a visit to China, the then
Chief Minister of Maharashtra,
Devendra Fadnavis, announced on 20 May 2015, that the
China Communications Construction Company (CCCC) had expressed interest in the MTHL project. According to Fadnavis, the CCCC will complete the project within 3–4 years of being appointed and will also provide 2% concessional funding for the project. In November 2015, the project was cleared by the Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority (MCZMA). In January 2016, the Forest Advisory Committee (FAC) granted forest clearance, and the Experts' Appraisal Committee (EAC) attached to the MoEFCC granted CRZ clearance to the project. The CRZ came with a rider requiring the MMRDA to spend at least ₹ 335 crore towards an "environment management programme". In the same month, Fadnavis announced that the project had received all required clearances. In February 2016, JICA agreed to loan 80% of the total cost of the project to the state government at an annual interest rate of 1–1.4%. The MMRDA will bear 1.2% of the project cost, and the remaining amount will be borne by the state government. As part of the agreement between JICA and the state government, 2 rescue lanes will be added to the proposed plan for the MTHL, and a 4 km stretch of the bridge will be constructed as a steel-only structure instead of previous plan to build a cement and concrete bridge. The use of steel on this stretch will raise the project cost by ₹ 4000 crores. JICA formally approved the funding agreement on 9 May 2016, and the MMRDA began the bidding process the following day. The MTHL received final environment clearance from the State Forest Department in May 2017.
Tendering The MMRDA invited request for qualifications (RFQ) for civil construction of three packages – a bridge section across the Mumbai Bay and Sewri interchange (6,600 crore), a bridge section across Mumbai Bay and Shivaji Nagar, near Gavan interchange (4,900 crore), and a viaduct including interchanges at SH-52, SH-54, and NH-4B near
Chirle, Navi Mumbai. The MMRDA received 11 pre-qualification bids each for the first and second packages, and 17 bids for the third package. The agency stated that a single party would not be awarded the first and second packages together, although any other combination of the three packages would be permitted. The MMRDA appointed a consortium formed by
AECOM Asia Co. Ltd., Padeco India Pvt. Ltd,
Dar Al-Handasah, and
T. Y. Lin International as the general consultant for the project on 26 November 2016. According to U.P.S. Madan, the then Metropolitan Commissioner of the MMRDA, stated that the general consultants appointed for the MTHL project would engage in various activities, such as to help MMRDA organise pre-bid meetings, examine bid documents, secure various permissions from government, semi-government, examine concept designs, monitor construction of the project and ensure quality of the work among other things. After evaluating the bids, in January 2017, the MMRDA shortlisted a total of 29 contractors for the three packages and floated tenders for the request for proposal (RFP) stage, the final stage of the bidding process. The agency fixed 5 April 2017 as the final date for submissions of the RFP bids. The submission date was later postponed to 5 June. However, the agency received over 3,000 queries from the shortlisted bidders, and was again forced to postpone the date to 17 July to respond to all queries. The MMRDA applied for security clearance from the Union
Ministry of Home Affairs to carry out construction near the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, the
Mumbai Port Trust and the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust. These facilities have restricted areas that are covered by the
Official Secrets Act. The MMRDA also submitted the names of all companies that bid for the project to the Home Ministry. The ministry will grant clearance after consultations with other ministries, such as the
Ministry of External Affairs and
intelligence agencies. The Home Ministry denied security clearance to a bid from China Railway Major Bridge Engineering Group in a joint venture with Gayatri Projects Limited, and also to a consortium of IL&FS Engineering Limited and Ranjit Buildcon Limited. Both consortia were subsequently disqualified from the bidding process by the MMRDA. The MMRDA stated that the Home Ministry had not provided the agency with any official reason for denying security clearance. IL&FS Engineering filed an appeal against the decision in the
Bombay High Court on 18 July. The Court permitted IL&FS to submit its bid, subject to a final decision by the Court. The MMRDA received bids from 17 of the 29 shortlisted contractors by the final bid submission date on 19 July 2017. The agency stated that it would take a month to conduct technical evaluations of the bids and to award contracts. On 9 November 2017, the MMRDA awarded contracts to a consortium of
Larsen & Toubro (L&T) and Japan's
IHI Corporation, a consortium of
Daewoo and
Tata Projects (TPL), and L&T itself to construct the Sewri side of the sea bridge, the Navi Mumbai side of the sea bridge, and the bridge portion on land towards Chirle, respectively. The contracts between the MMRDA and the L&T-IHI Corporation consortium were officially signed on 27 December 2017. L&T was awarded for the 10.38 km package 1 and for the 3.61 km package 3. The contract for the 7.807 km package 2 was signed with Daewoo and Tata Projects at a cost of at a later date. The MMRDA invited bids for Package 4 in September 2021. The tender includes the design, supply, installation, testing, and commissioning of an
intelligent transport system, toll management, highway and bridge street lighting, electrical works, construction of toll plazas, and administrative buildings. The contract for Package 4 was awarded to a joint venture between Strabag Infrastructure & Safety Solutions GmbH and Strabag AG, both owned by the
Austrian construction company,
Strabag. According to MMRDA officials, land owners were given the same compensation package as that given in the
Navi Mumbai International Airport project. Three hundred and twenty structures in Sewri were affected by the project, of which 250 properties were residential. The MMRDA provided resettlement for the affected people by offering accommodation in either
Kanjurmarg or
Kurla. The majority chose to relocate to Kanjurmarg. The MMRDA also paid each as compensation to 1,500 fishermen who were affected by the construction of the project. In October 2016, the MMRDA agreed to pay MbPT a total of 1000 crores in installments over the course of 30 years, as rent for using the MbPT's land for construction of ramps for the MTHL on the Mumbai side. The MMRDA received 27.2 hectares of land on the Sewri side of the MbPT, of which 15.17 hectares were temporarily used for the casting yard. The MMRDA utilized drones to carry out survey work for the MTHL. The drones were fitted with 360-degree cameras that provide up to 3 mm accuracy. The aerial survey takes less time than a regular survey, achieves greater accuracy and helps protect against false claims for compensation. Over 1,000 boreholes were drilled to study the strata. The MMRDA began conducting a geological survey for the project on 15 January 2018. The project work affected 1,635 trees, of which 753 were cut, and the remaining 882 were replanted at other locations. Most of the affected trees were located at Sewri and
Vakola.
Metro line In 2010, the MMRDA appointed
Rail India Technical and Economic Service (RITES) to prepare a
detailed project report (DPR) for the Mumbai Trans Harbour Metro Rail Link (MTHMRL), a proposal to build a dual-track metro line under the road lanes of the MTHL. The 49-km long metro line was proposed to connect
Prabhadevi and Dushmi, about 20 km away from Chirle. The metro line was to be extended to the proposed
Navi Mumbai International Airport, and connected to the proposed
Ranjanpada-
Seawoods-
Kharkopar corridor of the
Navi Mumbai Metro and the proposed Sewri-Prabhadevi corridor of the
Mumbai Metro. However, the MMRDA scrapped plans for the metro line in 2012 and decided to build only a road bridge. An MMRDA official stated that a detailed study has revealed that laying the foundation for the bridge with provisions for two metro lines would hike costs, instead of saving expenses. Hence, it would be feasible to have a separate bridge for the metro in the future. Another reason given was that the Navi Mumbai International Airport and Sewri-Prabhadevi corridor of the Mumbai Metro were still a long way from completion. In June 2021, the MMRDA stated that it was re-examining the possibility of building metro lines on the MTHL. An official stated that there would be no need for extra construction on the MTHL for the metro line, as only the tracks would have to be added. Already, the Worli–Sewri underground metro corridor, as part of the
Line 3 (Aqua Line) of
Mumbai Metro, is being constructed. The Sewri metro station will connect the MTHL through access paths, thereby linking it to Navi Mumbai. In September 2021, the MMRDA stated that regardless of the decision on metro lines, the agency would dedicate two lanes on the MTHL for a
bus rapid transit system. The agency appointed a consultant to determine whether metro lines could be constructed on the MTHL in January 2022. The draft report of the study submitted in April 2022 found that the MTHL's existing pillars would not be able to support the load of a metro system. The then Metropolitan Commissioner of the MMRDA, S.V.R. Srinivas, stated that the agency was exploring solutions, such as increasing the load bearing capacity of the pillars, before making a final decision. ==Construction==