Tsez grammar was first analyzed by the Georgian linguist
Davit Imnaishvili in 1963. Currently, a collection of Tsez folklore texts (written in the Mokok dialect) is in production.
Nouns Nouns are inflected for
number and
case, and have
noun classes assigned to them.
Number Nouns can either be singular or plural. The plural is formed by adding
-bi to the stem in the
absolutive case:
besuro (fish [sg.]) →
besuro-bi (fish [pl.]). For all other cases, the suffix is
-za; thus, "of the fish [pl.]" becomes
besuro-za-s.
Case There are eight syntactical and a much larger number of locative cases, which distinguish three categories: location, orientation, and direction. Thus, counting the both locative and non-locative cases, there are 64 cases. Tsez is an
ergative–absolutive language, which means that it makes no distinction between the subject of an intransitive sentence and the object of a transitive one. Both are in the unmarked absolutive case; the agent of the transitive sentence is in the ergative case. According to
Ramazan Rajabov, the oblique stem of 42% of the nouns is different from the absolutive stem. Some nouns change their internal structure (such as a vowel), but others add one of about 20 so-called "thematic suffixes" to their end, to which the other case suffixes are attached. For example, the word for "language" or "tongue" is
mec, but its oblique stem is
mecre-, hence its plural is
mecrebi, the ergative
mecrā and so on. Rajabov says that the choice of the correct thematic suffix is sometimes difficult even for native speakers. It is likely that their origin lies in an application of two different plural forms, similar to the way the English word "children" actually has two archaic plural endings:
-(e)r and
-en. In Tsez it is sometimes even possible to use both the archaic and the regular and more productive
-bi plural for a word.
Syntactic case suffixes Of the two genitive cases, the first is used as attribute to an absolutive head noun and the second to an oblique one. That means, that the Genitive 1 is used for phrases like
žekʼu-s is (the man's bull), and the Genitive 2 is used for
žekʼu-z is-er (for the man's bull). The Equative 1 is used to make comparisons, like
besuro-ce (like a fish) and can also be attached to other cases. Rajabov suggests 3 more syntactical cases, namely
possessive 1 (
-łay), possessive 2 (
-xu) and
abessive (
-tay). However, their status is debatable, as they seem to show both inflectional as well as derivational tendencies. Certain derivational endings also require a specific noun class, see the section about derivation below. Verbs and adverbs always agree with the absolutive argument of the phrase, regardless of the clause's transitivity. If more than one absolutive argument is linked by the conjunction
-n(o) ("and") and one of them is of the first noun class, then class I plural triggers the agreement for the clause; otherwise, it is class II/III/IV plural. Compare: {{interlinear|indent=3|glossing=no abbr and
Pronouns Personal pronouns Personal pronouns exist in Tsez only for the first and second person; for the third person the demonstratives
že (singular) and
žedi (plural) are used. As the singular personal pronouns have the same form in absolutive and ergative, a sentence like
Di mi okʼsi is ambiguous, because it can both mean "I hit you" and "You hit me", due to the rather free word order. However, they have a different form for the oblique cases and an irregular form in the genitive 1 case, the same as the plural pronouns. The singular pronouns also have the same forms for all four noun classes, while the plurals make this distinction, as shown in the chart below. • This form is used before a syllable-final consonant, such as the suffix
-r. • This form is used before a syllable-initial consonant, such as the suffix
-de. • The special forms of the two genitives is used when the possessor is a close group, typically a family, thus
eli eniy is used for "our mother" instead of
elus eniy. The plural demonstrative
žedi ("they") also shows this feature, being
žedi in the close group genitive 1 and
žediz in the close group genitive 2. For ordinary possessors these forms would be
žedus and
žeduz, respectively. • There is also a reflexive personal pronoun, meaning "self" or "oneself", which is
žo and
ne- in its oblique form, respectively.
Demonstrative pronouns Demonstrative pronouns are suffixes that are attached to the corresponding noun. They inflect for noun classes, number and case and make a two-way distinction into
proximal (close, English: "this/these") and
distal (far, English: "that/those"), the latter of which are also used as third person pronouns. The oblique forms are used attributively and also as a base to which other (oblique) case suffixes can be attached. • The
-ł forms are used optionally after vowels at the end of words.
Interrogative pronouns Interrogative pronouns make a distinction between human ("who?") and non-human ("what?") only in the oblique forms, but not in the absolutive. The non-human interrogative pronouns require the class IV affix when triggering agreement. Interrogative pronouns that are replacing an adjunct (as, for instance, "when?" or "why?") usually occur at the beginning of the sentence, while those replacing arguments ("who?", "what?", etc.) often stay in the position of the replaced word. However, they can be fronted as well for the purpose of discourse-specific linking. Thus, a fronted
šebi might be translated as "Which...?" instead of "What...?". Other interrogative pronouns include: •
dice ("how much?") •
didiyu ("which?") •
didur ("how?") •
łina-s ("why?"), this seems to be the genitive 1 form of the non-human oblique interrogative pronoun •
nā ("where?"), stem
na- •
neti ("when?") •
šidā ("why?") •
šomo ("how many?")
Verbs Tsez has a rich verbal morphology with many categories. Despite the great variety in
conjugation, the only truly irregular verb is "to be" with some forms being
yoł (present),
ānu (present negative),
zow- (past), etc. There are 4 morphological groups, according to the final phoneme of the stem: The first group ends in a consonant, the second in
i, the third in
-u and the fourth group contains the verbs with the variable ending
-d (before a vowel) /
-y (elsewhere).
Tense-aspect-mood There are five
tense forms in the
indicative mood, shown in the following table with examples for verbs with vocalic and consonantal stem endings. The past forms make an
evidentiality distinction. • In interrogative sentences (English "wh-questions"), the past witnessed suffix is
-ā instead of
-s(i). In yes–no questions, the finite verb receives the additional ending
-ā, except for the past witnessed form, which receives the ending
-iyā (after consonants) or
-yā (after vowels). • Of the two different future tenses, the definite one bears the connotation of being wanted by the speaker ("I want and I will...") and is only used with the first person, while the indefinite one (simply "will") tends to be used with second and third. • Other moods are formed as follows: • The
imperative has no suffix for intransitive verbs (e.g.
-ikʼi! "go!") and the suffix
-o for transitive verbs (e.g.
tʼetʼr-o! "read!"); the verb is usually put in the first position in the phrase then. • The
optative adds a
-ƛ to the imperative form, e.g.
tʼetʼr-o-ƛ! ("let him read!"). • There is also a great variety of analytical forms for verbs often exhibiting
aspectual meaning: •
emphatic future = infinitive + "to be" (present tense); e.g.
-ikʼ-a yoł ("shall go") •
continuous aspect = imperfect gerund + "to be" (in its appropriate tense-aspect form); e.g.
-ikʼi-x zow-si ("was going") •
perfective aspect = perfect gerund + "to be"; e.g.
-ikʼi-n zow-si ("had gone") •
perfect = resultative participle + "to be"; e.g.
-ikʼ-āsi zow-si ("had gone") •
intentive = present participle + "to be"; e.g.
-ikʼi-xo-si zow-si ("intended to go") •
resultative = imperfective/perfective gerund + resultative participle of
-iči- ("be located") + "to be"; e.g.
-ikʼi-n -ič-ā-si zow-si ("was gone") or
-ikʼi-x -ič-ā-si zow-si ("was in the state of being on his way hence")
Negation The basic negation suffix in the indicative is
-čʼV with
V being a vowel that can be different, depending on the tense/aspect/mood of the verb; it is inserted after the verb stem. With the example verb
-ikʼi- ("to go"), the following forms are possible: • The prohibitive (i.e. the negative imperative) is expressed by adding the suffix
-no to the future indefinite form of the verb, e.g.
-āš-no! ("don't eat!"). • The negative optative form simply adds a
-ƛ to that:
āš-no-ƛ ("let him not eat!").
Non-finite forms Participles behave like adjectives and only vary according to the class agreement, which gets attached to them as prefixes. There are several different kinds of participles in the Tsez language: • The stem vowel here is the vowel before the last consonant. Note that stems, different from roots, include causatives; thus
-ikʼi- ("to go") becomes
-ākʼi-, but its causative form
-ikʼir- ("to let go") becomes
-ikʼār-! Sometimes also unarticulated epenthetic vowels can be lengthened to
ā, as in:
tʼetʼr- ("to learn"), which becomes
tʼetʼār-. Converbs, like
gerunds and verbal adverbs, are very numerous in Tsez. The following list gives only an incomplete account. The table illustrates the relationship between the temporal converb (C) and the main verb (V): • Other non-temporal converbs are: •
perfective (completive) and
imperfective (durative)
converbs are identical to the past unwitnessed and present forms respectively:
-n(o) and
-x(o) •
locative converb:
-z-ā, stem vowel changes to
ā •
causal converb:
-xoy,
-za-ƛʼ or
-za-q; e.g.
-iš-xoy ("because of eating") •
conditional converb:
-nāy or
-łi; e.g.
iš-nāy ("if he eats") •
concessive converb:
-łin •
infinitive:
-a; e.g.
-iš-a ("to eat") •
verbal noun:
-(a)ni; e.g.
-iš-ani ("the eating") and
-rečʼ-ni ("the cutting")
Potential and causative The
potential mood receives the suffix
-(e)ł, while the
causative mood suffix is
-(e)r. Again, the epenthetic vowel is dropped when the stem ends in a vowel or if another suffix starting with a vowel is attached. Together with the definite future suffixes
-an, for instance, the epenthetic vowel has to be dropped:
iš-er ("let him eat"), but
iš-r-an ("will let him eat").
Particles Tsez has a rich set of
particles, most of them occurring as
clitics. The particle
-tow shows general emphasis while
-kin shows general emphasis and focusing. A contrastively topicalized constituent is marked by the particle
-gon. Being clitics, they can be attached to any
part of speech. There is also a quotation particle that is used in direct reported speech and appears as the suffix
-ƛin that always appears at the end of the quoted phrase or sentence. Example:
Di žekʼu yołƛin eƛix kʼetʼā ("'I am a man', says the cat"). There are also other free particles like
hudu ("yes, so") or
āy ("no").
Word formation Derivation Noun-forming suffixes The following list is a selection of suffixes used to form nouns from other parts of speech as well as other nouns. •
-bi /
-zi (added to place names):
residentse.g.
Newo-bi /
Newo-zi ("resident of Mokok", from
Newo "Mokok") •
-łi (added to singular absolutive nouns denoting persons or to adjectives in the class IV form):
abstract nouns and
occupationse.g.
laɣ-łi ("slavery", from
laɣ "slave"),
učitel-łi ("teaching", from the Russian loan
učitel "teacher"),
r-igu-łi ("grace, kindness", from
-igu "good") •
-kʼu (added to verbs in the iterative stem forms):
instruments or
personal descriptionse.g.
ˤuƛʼno-kʼu ("coward", from
ˤuƛʼ-, "to be afraid"),
ˤiya-kʼu ("cryer", from
ˤiyad-, "to cry") •
-ni (added to verb stems and onomatopoeic nouns):
abstract nounse.g.
rečʼ-ni ("sharpness", from
rečʼ- "to cut"),
ˤoy-ni ("mooing", from
ˤoy "moo") •
-qu (added to nouns in their oblique stem) or the lesser used Awar suffix
-qan:
container or
occupatione.g.
magala-qu ("baker"),
bocʼ-a-qu ("wolf-trap"),
qido-qan ("mason") •
-qʼoy /
-qoy /
-ħoy (added to singular oblique noun stems):
enveloping objectse.g.
reƛʼi-qoy ("glove", from
reƛʼa "hand") •
-yo (added to the lative singular of a noun):
possessore.g.
kotʼu-r-yo ("bearded man", from
kotʼu "beard")
Adjective-forming suffixes The following suffixes can be used to derive adjectives from other words: •
-mu (added to singular absolutive noun, adjectives or verbs):
simple adjectivee.g.
boryo-mu ("sickly", from
boryo "sore, wound"),
atʼi-mu ("unripe", from
atʼiy "wet"),
šakarya-mu ("jealous", from
šakaryad- "to be jealous") •
-šay (added to oblique noun stems):
inseparable possessinge.g.
čakaryo-šay čay ("sweet tea", literally "sugar-containing tea") •
-tay (added to oblique noun stems):
absence,
lackinge.g.
ciyo-tay ("unsalted") •
-xu (added to oblique noun stems):
separable possessinge.g.
ciyo-xu raƛʼ ("soil with salt crystals")
Verb-forming suffixes Some verb-forming suffixes, like the causative and potential derivatives, have already been mentioned in the section about the verbal morphology. Other examples include: •
-kʼ- (added to qualitative adjectives, adverbs and some intransitive verbs ending in
-x):
transitive verbse.g.
atʼi-kʼ- ("to dampen, to soak", from
atʼiy "wet"),
bito-kʼ- ("to move sth.", from
bittay "over there"),
łicʼo-kʼ- ("to unite", from
łicʼox- "to mix") •
-ł- (added to qualitative adjectives and adverbs):
intransitive verbse.g.
atʼi-ł- ("to become wet", from
atʼiy "wet"),
ade-x- ("to move forward", from
adāy "in front")
Compounding and reduplication In Tsez it is also possible to create new words from combining existing ones; usually nouns and verbs are derived, but there also exist compound adjectives and adverbs. Only the last component of the compound inflects, as it is the head of the phrase. However, it does not necessarily govern the noun class assignment for compound nouns—if one of the two components belongs to class I, then the whole compound is of this class, otherwise it is automatically assigned to noun class II. Sometimes, the last component is truncated (see fifth example). Suffixation may also occur (see first example). The following list is not exhaustive: •
debi-dey-łi "quarrel, dividing up" (lit. "your-my" + nominalizer
-łi) •
eni-obiy or
eni-obu "parents" (lit. "mother-father") •
ħotʼo-čʼel "stirrup" (lit. "foot-place") •
-ikʼi-nex- "to go back and forth" (lit. "go-come") •
ƛʼiri-ku "shawl" (lit.
ƛʼiri "above" -
kur "throw") •
niga-cʼuda "bruised" (lit. "red-green") •
rigu-žuka "anything" (lit. "good-bad") •
taqqo-naqqo "back and forth" (lit. "on that side - on this side") •
tʼitʼi-ečʼ- "hash" (lit. "tear-cut up") Another common way to derive new words is
reduplication, which can derive nouns, as well as adjectives and verbs. In reduplicating nouns, the initial syllable can often undergo a change, as in
xisi-basi "changes" or
bix-mix (herbs). It is used to intensify adjectives (e.g.
r-očʼi-r-očʼiy "very cold") and verbs (e.g.
-okʼ-okʼ- "to stab repeatedly") but is also used for
onomatopoeia (e.g.
ħi-ħi "neigh"). Another highly productive way of forming verbs is the combination of a word (often a loan from Arabic or Avar) and the Tsez verbs
-oq- ("to stay, to become") or
-od- ("to do"), although some combinations can also be formed with other verbs. Note that only the second word is inflected, while the first one remains uninflected. Some examples are: •
bercin -oq- "to be decorated" (from Avar
берцинав (
bercinaw) "beautiful") •
paradat -od- "to sell" (from Russian
продать (
prodat’) "to sell") •
razwod b-od- "to divorce" (from Russian
развод (
razvod) "divorce") •
riƛu riƛʼ- "to plough" (lit. "ploughing-field plough") •
rokʼ-ƛʼo-r r-ay- "to remember" (lit. "heart-SUPER-LAT III-arrive") •
rokʼu r-exu- "to feel pity" (lit. "heart die") •
sapu y-od- "to destroy" •
tʼamizi -od- "to cause" (from Avar
тIамизе (
tʼamize) "to force") •
woržizi -oq- "to fly" (from Avar
-оржизе (
-oržize) "to fly") •
xabar b-od- "to talk" (from Arabic
خبر (
xabar) "news, message" via Avar
хабар (
xabar) "story") ==Syntax==