Unhitched (book)

Seymour assesses Hitchens' conversion from an opponent of neoconservatism to an Iraq War hawk, observing that he belongs to a "recognizable type: a left-wing defector with a soft spot for empire". For Seymour, Hitchens' conversion was the result of a perception of religion as a global force for evil and an accompanying sense that American imperialism could be a force for good. However, Seymour also traces the origins of Hitchens' neoconservatism to his earlier support for causes such as that of the British government in the Falklands War and his view that the Roman conquest of Britain constituted "a huge advance" in the development of the region. Seymour also considers Hitchens' reversal on the Bosnian War, his call for humanitarian intervention at the end of the Gulf War, his reverence for Rudyard Kipling and George Orwell, and his defence of the Tunisian government in 2007. ==Critical reception==

Unhitched received a mixed reception from critics, several of whom, such as James Kirchick, had been friends and colleagues of Hitchens. Gregory Shupak, writing for In These Times, a left-wing magazine, argued that Seymour, with his "gift for reeling off an entire firing squad's worth of bullets in a single sentence" was also "plainly a caliber of intellectual that his subject is not." The review of Unhitched in The Daily Telegraph argued that the book's contentions were "all perfectly to the point", and that the book was "well-argued", but due to its orthodox left-wing perspective omitted some potentially interesting lines of inquiry such as the possible influence of Hitchens's youthful bisexuality on his depictions of Gulf War soldiers. The book was forcefully denounced by Fred Inglis in The Independent, however, as "sectarian and mean-spirited". Writing for Newsweek, an article titled "A Nasty Piece of Work" by James Kirchick described Unhitched as a "tawdry new book" that, among other things, included unsubstantiated claims of plagiarism and unfounded personal attacks. Seymour responded by saying that Kirchick's review "was the most deliciously splenetic fanboy tribute to unreasoning hysteria that it has ever been my pleasure to gloat about" in a piece for his blog that was subsequently reposted by Salon. Reviewing the book for the Irish magazine Red Banner, writer Kevin Higgins noted Seymour "lands many heavy punches" on Hitchens' reputation, and that "Unhitched is well written, if a little verbose in places". Higgins agreed with some of Seymour's criticisms of Hitchens, arguing when Hitchens "was wrong, he was very, very wrong", singling out as an example Hitchens' defence of the Bush administration's handling of the Hurricane Katrina disaster. However, Higgins also took issue with Seymour using former members of the Socialist Workers Party (UK) as sources, pointing out that though Seymour had left the SWP since he wrote Unhitched, he had been "happy to quote as reliable witnesses people whose word he clearly...no longer accepts as gospel". Higgins also stated that Seymour was wrong to criticise Hitchens for not having a detailed political program, arguing Hitchens "was never a writer of manifestos" but rather an iconoclastic journalist. ==References==