The Magna Carta for Public Social Workers addresses concerns regarding the discrimination of public social workers because of their sexual orientation:Section 17. Rights of a Public Social Worker. – Public social workers shall have the following rights:1.) Protection from discrimination on the grounds of sex, sexual orientation, age, political or religious beliefs, civil status, physical characteristics/disability or ethnicity;2.) Protection from any form of interference, intimidation, harassment, or punishment, to include, but not limited to, arbitrary reassignment or termination of service, in the performance of his/her duties and responsibilitiesThe Magna Carta for Women also provides an insight regarding the state's duties towards maintaining the rights of women, regardless of their sexual orientation:The State affirms women's rights as human rights and shall intensify its efforts to fulfill its duties under international and domestic law to recognize, respect, protect, fulfill, and promote all human rights and fundamental freedoms of women, especially marginalized women, in the economic, social, political, cultural, and other fields without distinction or discrimination on account of class, age, sex, gender, language, ethnicity, religion, ideology, disability, education, and status. In 2001, an anti-discrimination bill banning discrimination based on sexual orientation was unanimously approved by the House but it was stalled in the Senate, and ultimately died. The only bill directly concerning discrimination against the LGBTQ community in the Philippines is the
Anti-Discrimination Bill, also known as the
SOGIE Equality Bill. This bill seeks that all persons regardless of sex, sexual orientation or gender identity be treated the same as everyone else, wherein conditions do not differ in the privileges granted and the liabilities enforced. The bill was introduced by Hon. Kaka J. Bag-ao, the District Representative of the Dinagat Islands, on July 1, 2013. A huge bloc of lawmakers, collectively called the
Equality Champs of Congress, have been pushing for the full passage of the
Anti-Discrimination Bill for 18 years. More than 130 lawmakers backed its complete passage and legislation in the first month of its reintroduction to Congress in 2016 alone. in a unanimous 198–0 vote, under the wing of representatives
Kaka Bag-ao,
Teddy Baguilat, Tom Villarin,
Christopher de Venecia,
Geraldine Roman, Arlene Brosas, Carlos Zarate, and House Speaker
Pantaleon Alvarez after 17 years of languishing in Congress. After passage in the House, the bill had to be voted on in the
Senate. Conservative senators
Tito Sotto,
Manny Pacquiao, and
Joel Villanueva told media that they would block the bill at its current state, while
Win Gatchalian,
Dick Gordon,
Migz Zubiri,
Cynthia Villar,
Ping Lacson,
Gregorio Honasan,
Alan Peter Cayetano,
Chiz Escudero,
Ralph Recto and
Koko Pimentel expressed support only if modifications to the bill were passed. Senator
Risa Hontiveros, the principal author and backer of the bill, championed the bill's passage in the Senate. The bill was also backed by senators
Nancy Binay,
Franklin Drilon,
Bam Aquino,
Loren Legarda,
JV Ejercito,
Kiko Pangilinan,
Grace Poe,
Antonio Trillanes,
Sonny Angara, and
Leila de Lima. In January 2018, the bill finally reached the period of amendments after the period of interpolations was deemed finished. It took almost a year before it reached the period of amendments due to conservative senators who vowed to block the bill until the very end. In February and March 2018, senators Sotto, Pacquiao and Villanueva renewed their call against the passage of the bill in any of its possible forms. In June 2019, with the end of the session of the 17th Congress, the bill officially died, as the Senate had failed to tackle it in that session. The bill has become one of the slowest-moving bills in the country's history. The passed house version of the bill would have penalised discrimination with a fine of not less than ₱100,000 but not more than ₱500,000, or imprisonment of between one and six years, depending on the court's decision. Senator
Risa Hontiveros expressed confidence that the bill would pass the next Congress, and commented on the bill's wider acceptance among policy makers and the public. In early July 2019, Senator
Sonny Angara introduced a new proposal to Congress. "Any form of discrimination threatens social stability and economic progress in the Philippines, making it imperative that discrimination—or any act that establishes, promotes and perpetuates standing inequalities and disregards the right to 'equality of treatment' afforded by the 1987 Constitution—be reduced", Angara argued. The measure would prohibit unfair discrimination based on, among other categories, sex, sexual orientation and gender identity and expression. In September 2019, President Duterte expressed in-principle support for the bill, though stated that he personally preferred a general anti-discrimination law.
Local government ordinances Nine
provinces prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. These are
Aklan (2025),
Albay (2022),
Agusan del Norte (2014),
Bataan (2021),
Batangas (2015),
Cavite (2014–18), the
Dinagat Islands (2016),
Ilocos Sur (2017), and
Iloilo (2016). The province of
Cavite previously prohibited discrimination based on sexual orientation only, but enacted gender identity protections in 2018. Various cities, barangays and municipalities throughout the Philippines also have non-discrimination ordinances, some of which are as follows:
Antipolo (2015),
Bacolod (2013),
Baguio (2017),
Batangas City (2016),
Butuan (2016),
Calamba (2017),
Candon (2014),
Carmen (2025),
Cebu City (2012), Davao (2012),
Dumaguete (2019),
General Santos (2016),
Himamaylan (2018),
Ilagan (2019),
Iloilo City (2018),
Malabon (2018),
Mandaluyong (2018),
Mandaue (2016), Manila (2020),
Marikina (2019),
Orani (2019),
Pasig (2022),
Poro (2019),
Puerto Princesa (2015),
Quezon City (enacted in 2003, and expanded further in 2014),
San Juan (2017),
Santa Rosa (2014),
Taguig (2018),
Valenzuela (2019),
Vigan (2014),
Zamboanga City (2020), and
Lapu-Lapu City (2023). The city of
Dagupan enacted an anti-discrimination ordinance in 2010, which includes sexual orientation as a protected characteristic. The anti-discrimination ordinance does not explicitly mention gender identity. However, the terms "sex", "gender" and "other status" could be interpreted as covering it.
Anti-bullying laws Sexual orientation and gender identity are included as prohibited grounds of bullying in the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of the
Anti-Bullying Law, approved by Congress in 2013.
Financial services Generally, financial service providers have the right to select clients, except when such selection is discriminatory based on protected attributes, including gender and sexual orientation, as outlined in the Financial Products and Services Consumer Protection Act.
Property laws Unmarried people can co-owned property. In a decision released by the
Supreme Court in 2026, it ruled that there is nothing precluding same-sex couples to co-own properties despite the lack of legal recognition of their union. The high court states that Article 148 of the
Family Code of the Philippines regarding properties obtained by two people cohabitating is "broad enough to cover same-sex cohabitation and should not be limited to heterosexual relationships,"
Gender-based sexual harassment protections Section 11 of the Safe Spaces Act defines specific acts that constitute Gender-Based Sexual Harassment (GBSH) in streets and public spaces. These acts include cursing, wolf-whistling, catcalling, leering, and intrusive gazing. Other prohibited behaviors are taunting, pursuing, unwanted invitations,
misogynistic,
transphobic,
homophobic, and
sexist slurs, as well as persistent unwanted comments on one’s appearance or relentless requests for personal information such as name, contact details, social media accounts, or destination. The use of words, gestures, or actions that ridicule a person based on sex, gender, or sexual orientation, identity, and/or expression—including sexist, homophobic, and transphobic statements and slurs—is also prohibited. Additionally, acts such as persistently telling sexual jokes, using sexual names, comments, or demands, and making statements that invade a person’s personal space or threaten their sense of personal safety are considered violations. Penalties for these offenses vary depending on the number of violations. For a first offense, violators are fined ₱1,000 and required to complete 12 hours of community service, including attendance at a Gender Sensitivity Seminar conducted by the
Philippine National Police (PNP) in coordination with the Local Government Unit (LGU) and the
Philippine Commission on Women (PCW). A second offense is punishable by arresto menor (6 to 10 days) or a fine of ₱3,000. For a third offense, violators face arresto menor (11 to 30 days) and a fine of ₱10,000.
Anti-HIV and AIDS discrimination Republic Act 11166 outlines state policies prohibiting discrimination related to HIV and AIDS, as well as other protected attributes that may intersect with or relate to actual or perceived
HIV status, such as
sexual orientation,
gender identity, and
expression, which are often associated with HIV. Specifically, it states: "Policies and practices that discriminate on the basis of perceived or actual HIV status, sex, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, age, economic status, disability, and ethnicity hamper the enjoyment of basic human rights and freedoms guaranteed in the Constitution and are deemed inimical to national interest."The Act also defines discrimination as:"Discrimination refers to unfair or unjust treatment that distinguishes, excludes, restricts, or shows preferences based on any ground such as sex, gender, age, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, economic status, disability, ethnicity, and HIV status, whether actual or perceived, and which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise by all persons similarly situated, of all their rights and freedoms."
Executive Branch Diversity and Inclusion Policy (DIP) Ex-President Rodrigo Duterte signed Executive Order No. 100 s. 2019 on December 17, 2019, institutionalizing the government’s Diversity and Inclusion Program (DIP) to protect and promote the rights and welfare of all Filipinos. The DIP serves as a national initiative to consolidate efforts and enforce laws, rules, and issuances against discrimination. The program aims to foster a supportive, collaborative, and inclusive environment by ensuring equal opportunities and recognizing diverse perspectives. It includes training and orientation programs to equip government personnel with the skills to manage diversity effectively. Additionally, the DIP establishes accountability mechanisms within government institutions—such as departments, agencies, state universities, government corporations, and local government units—and provides processes for addressing discrimination-related complaints and other concerns. Building on this initiative, President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. issued Executive Order No. 51 s. 2023, amending EO 100 s. 2019 to further strengthen the Diversity and Inclusion Program (DIP). The new order reconstitutes the Inter-Agency Committee on Diversity and Inclusion and establishes the Special Committee on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersex, and Asexual (LGBTQIA+) Affairs. The creation of the Special Committee on
LGBTQIA+ aims to enhance existing mechanisms to combat discrimination against the LGBTQIA+ community and provide a platform for their meaningful participation in government policy formulation.
Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability The Supreme Court in 2023, updates the 34-year-old Code of Professional Responsibility. It establishes ethical standards and accountability measures for lawyers, ensuring that their conduct upholds the integrity of the legal profession. Developed through consultations with over 2,000 legal practitioners, the CPRA aims to address modern legal challenges while safeguarding professionalism and human rights within the justice system. The CPRA explicitly emphasizes fairness and respect for diversity, addressing discrimination based on various attributes, including
sexual orientation,
gender identity, and
expression (SOGIE). It promotes inclusivity by requiring lawyers to avoid any actions or behavior that may perpetuate bias or discrimination. The code also outlines mechanisms to hold lawyers accountable if they engage in discriminatory practices, thus protecting individuals from prejudicial treatment in the legal profession. ==Living conditions==