Varpas was geared towards intelligentsia with stated goal to rise Lithuanian national consciousness and, ultimately, to achieve autonomy within the
Russian Empire. Influenced by
Polish positivism,
Varpas argued that Lithuanians could achieve this through work, economic development, education, and other non-violent means. Therefore, much of the articles included discussions about improving land reform, school system, health care, transportation network, etc. Some articles were more practical "how to" guides, but most remained theoretical lectures and discussions. About a quarter of
Varpas content was related history. However, unlike
Aušra, it rejected
Romantic idealization of heroic past (which lead to two failed
uprisings in 1830 and
1863) and concentrated on more practical and useful contemporary history. Writers believed that understanding of current European politics could provide more beneficial than glorification of the old
Grand Duchy of Lithuania.
Varpas was also a political newspaper, criticizing
Tsarist policies, demanding abolition of the
Lithuanian press ban and other
Russification practices, and requesting equal cultural and political rights for all nations within the Russian empire.
Varpas also maintained an anti-Polish position, but abandoned some oversimplified prejudice against Poles and Polonized Lithuanians that was apparent in
Aušra. For example, instead of blaming foreigners (Poles or Russians) for the demise of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, writers looked for internal reasons for the historical failures. However, the newspaper still called for development and strengthening of distinctively Lithuanian culture separate from Polish. Political demands included autonomy for Lithuania, but not resurrection of the
Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth. Towards the end of its publication and the
Russian Revolution of 1905,
Varpas became more socialist, including co-editor
Vincas Mickevičius-Kapsukas, future leader of the
Lithuanian Soviet Socialist Republic (1918–1919). Overall, the content of
Varpas was extremely varied. In an attempt to unite various political fractions, efforts were made to include liberal, socialist, Catholic, and other articles. One column could contradict another. ==Editors and contributors==