Art history As visual culture studies, in the United States, have begun to address areas previously studied by
art history, there have been disputes between the two fields. One of the reasons for controversy was that the various approaches in art history, like
formalism,
iconology,
social history of art, or
New Art History, focused only on artistic images, assuming a distinction with non-artistic ones, while in visual culture studies there is typically no such distinction.
Image studies While the image remains a focal point in visual culture studies, it is the relations between images and consumers that are evaluated for their cultural significance, not just the image in and of itself.
Martin Jay clarifies, "Although images of all kinds have long served as illustrations of arguments made discursively, the growth of visual culture as a field has allowed them to be examined more in their own terms as complex figural artifacts or the stimulants to visual experiences."
Bildwissenschaft Though the development of
Bildwissenschaft ("image-science") in the
German-speaking world to an extent paralleled that of the field of visual culture in the United Kingdom and United States,
Bildwissenschaft occupies a more central role in the
liberal arts and
humanities than that afforded to visual culture. Significant differences between
Bildwissenschaft and Anglophone cultural and visual studies include the former's examination of images dating from the
early modern period, and its emphasis on continuities over breaks with the past. Whereas Anglo-American visual studies can be seen as a continuation of
critical theory in its attempt to reveal power relations,
Bildwissenschaft is not explicitly political. WJT Mitchell and Gottfried Boehm have had a discussion about these potential differences in an exchange of letters. == History ==