Wang Tong is a controversial figure in
Confucianism. During his life, as well as the period immediately after it, Wang Tong was viewed by the Sui and early Tang courts as being egregiously "out of step with prevailing Confucian ideology", with some scholars suggesting this official disdain led to him not being included in the
Book of Sui. Many later Confucians would also take offense to Wang Tong's supposed hubris in emulating the writing style of the
Analects and acting as though he were an equal to Confucius himself. Later, detractors in the Qing dynasty would question his very existence, pointing out his youth and various dating discrepancies. Today, there is a broad consensus among both Western and Chinese scholars that Wang Tong was a real Sui dynasty Confucian teacher, although some debate remains over how the
Zhongshuo was compiled. Despite the controversy, Wang Tong's
Zhongshuo is undoubtedly an extremely important work in the Confucian canon, and his ideas would prove very influential for many later Confucians. Wang's innovative ideas were said to have enlivened Confucianism after the turmoil of the previous two centuries. His work on political philosophy and the master–subject relationship has been said to have been influential during the early
Tang dynasty, especially during the Zhenguan era (貞觀之治) of
Tang Taizong (a famous golden era in Chinese history). The Song dynasty philosopher
Cheng Yi said that Wang Tong surpassed the famous
Han dynasty Confucian
Yang Xiong in merit. Later, the eminent
Ming dynasty Confucian
Wang Yangming praised Wang Tong in his
Instructions for Practical Living and defended his emulation of the
Confucian Classics, saying that "Master Wenzhong was a worthy scholar" and that famous
Neo-Confucian Han Yu was "vastly inferior to Master Wenzhong". While still poorly studied in modern times, scholarship on Wang Tong has been picking up since the revival of interest in Confucianism that followed the
reform and opening up of the late 1970s. == References ==