Some Western New England speakers show the "generating conditions" The English of Western New England in fact shows many sharp differences throughout rather than one uniform accent. In 2001,
Charles Boberg, discussing that Western New England English was a likely direct influence on the Inland Northern English of the Great Lakes region, still identified as many as four or five English sub-regional accents within Western New England itself, based on data from the late 1990s: • Northwestern Vermont (centered on
Burlington) shows no raising of (except before nasal consonants), and therefore stays back in the mouth, leading to a cot–caught merger to [ɑ]; this whole process consistently follows the logic of the
Canadian Shift of Standard
Canadian English. • Southwestern Vermont (centered on
Rutland) shows a universal raising to and fronting to , but then oversteps and defies the logical direction of the
Northern Cities Vowel Shift by producing a cot–caught merger to [ɑ̈]. • Western Massachusetts (centered on
Springfield) shows a universal raising to and fronting to , following the logic of the
Northern Cities Vowel Shift, except that it tends towards a cot–caught merger to , which is especially completed among younger speakers. • Central Connecticut (centered on
Hartford) shows a universal raising to and fronting to , and thus avoiding the cot–caught merger; this whole process consistently follows the logic of the
Northern Cities Vowel Shift. • Coastal Connecticut (centered on
New Haven), in the above respects, appears to have more in common with
New York City English, including a clear absence of the cot–caught merger.
Charles Boberg argues that Northwestern New England (Vermont) English, due to its
cot–caught merger but failure to demonstrate other features of the Eastern New England dialect, must be considered as its own separate dialect. On the other hand, in discussing Southwestern New England English as its own unique dialect, he instead proposed that it be regarded as a "subtype" of the
Inland North dialect, based on the aforementioned commonalities, even if variable, such as the universal raising of the short
a and no cot–caught merger. However, some younger Southwestern New England speakers have diverged away from both of these features, which Boberg at least partly foresaw; such variables are discussed in greater detail below. ==Northwestern New England English==