Jana Bommersbach investigation Investigative journalist
Jana Bommersbach re-examined Judd's case for a series of articles in the
Phoenix New Times and a later book,
The Trunk Murderess: Winnie Ruth Judd (
Simon & Schuster, 1992). As part of her investigation, Bommersbach interviewed Judd herself. Bommersbach concluded that the police and prosecution were biased against Judd, and uncovered evidence that suggested she was innocent. She also faulted the press for its coverage of the trial. Bommersbach wrote that crime reporters of the day frequently acted as “judge and jury,” and covered high-profile trials in a way that would be considered "supermarket sleaze" today. She argued that the press helped create such an atmosphere of prejudice that Judd could not have possibly gotten a fair trial. According to Bommersbach, due to Phoenix's small population in 1931 (just over 48,000 people), members of the Phoenix police knew Halloran well, and were aware of his associates, friends, and girlfriends. Some police officers also knew the victims. Some even believed that Judd hadn't killed anyone, even in self-defense, but was only covering up for Halloran and possibly others. Halloran's release was considered by some to be a
miscarriage of justice, and his exoneration a political cover-up. His gray
Packard had been spotted at the crime scene the night of the murders and again the next day, suggesting that he might have been an accomplice. {{ external media| float = left According to Bommersbach, there were indications that Judd was not capable of dismembering Samuelson's body – a task that, according to autopsy photos, was performed with surgical skills that Judd did not possess – and that Judd was not even physically capable of lifting the bodies. Bommersbach also suggested that a second gun might have been involved, based on early newspaper reports that LeRoi was shot with a larger caliber bullet. Addressing the possibility that a person who possessed surgical skills dissected Samuelson's body, Bommersbach wrote about a nurse named Ann Miller, whom she interviewed for her book. Miller said that, while she was working at the Arizona State Hospital in 1936, Judd had confided to her that a Dr. Brown had come to see her while she was in prison and told her he was going to confess everything. Later, after Miller told a Phoenix attorney of Judd's story, he stated, "I'm sure she told you that. Dr. Brown came up to my office and wanted to tell the whole story. He made an appointment for the next week, but he died the day before the appointment." Brown died in June 1932 of heart disease at the age of 44.
1933 "confession letter" The 2014 discovery of a "confession letter", written in April 1933 in Judd's own hand to her attorney H.G. Richardson, raised new questions about her case. In the letter, which Judd called her "first and only confession," she stated that she alone planned and carried out the murder of LeRoi, with whom she was allegedly competing for Halloran's affections. She further stated that she had not planned to kill Samuelson, but did so after Samuelson, alerted by the gunshot that killed LeRoi, walked in on the murder scene and began fighting with Judd. Judd wrote that she also acted alone in handling and transporting the bodies. According to a
New Times article by Robert Pela, Richardson suppressed the letter because it contradicted the substance of an appeal he had just filed in her case. After Richardson's death, Judd wrote to his
widow repeatedly asking for return of the letter, for fear it would jeopardize hearings on her sanity and potential release from Arizona State Hospital, but Richardson's widow refused. In 2002, a few years after Judd's death, the letter was anonymously donated to the Arizona state archives. Those who have studied or been involved in the Judd case differ in their interpretation of the letter. While some believe it is a true confession, it has also been interpreted as an attempt by Judd to bolster her
insanity defense, clear Halloran, or even incriminate Halloran by admitting to a crime to which he could then be named an accessory – a strategy not possible if Judd contended that she had killed in self-defense. J. Dwight Dobkins, the co-author of the first book written about the Judd case,
Winnie Ruth Judd: The Trunk Murders (
Grosset & Dunlap, 1973), dismissed the letter as "just another of her many confessions, the one attempt to have Halloran named as an accomplice." ==In popular culture==