2025 Pahalgam attack

The Jammu and Kashmir insurgency began in the late 1980s, as part of the wider Kashmir conflict. Pakistan's role in launching the insurgency as well as in turning it into an Islamist militancy are well-documented in the scholarly literature. The rise of militancy in the region has led to an exodus of Kashmiri Hindus. Instances of massacres of Hindu civilians by militants became frequent across Jammu and Kashmir in the late 1990s and early 2000s, when Pakistan-based groups were more active in the insurgency. In 2019, the Indian government revoked the special status previously granted to Jammu and Kashmir, and extended the Constitution of India to the state in full, enabling non-locals to purchase property and settle down in Jammu and Kashmir. Also related is the issuance of domicile status to residents who did not qualify earlier as 'state-subjects', qualifying them for jobs and college seats. While fears have been expressed that these changes would result in a change in demographics in Kashmir, with non-locals settling in the area, critics of the earlier arrangement noted that it had created a legal asymmetry: people from Jammu and Kashmir had always been free to settle anywhere in India, but in Jammu and Kashmir people from elsewhere were barred from permanent residency, property ownership, and government jobs. This disparity was cited as discriminatory by proponents of the constitutional changes, who also noted that the previous laws discriminated against women from within the region by revoking their property rights if they married a non-permanent resident. After the revocation, a new militant group called The Resistance Front (TRF) sprang up in Kashmir, believed to have been sponsored by Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba, a UN designated terrorist group. TRF has been designated as a terrorist organisation in India and by the United States. It was formed from the cadres of LeT and Hizbul Mujahideen in Kashmir, and has carried out attacks on Hindu minority communities. killing 9 people and injuring 41 others. but later denied involvement. --> Prior to 2025, the largest terror attacks in Jammu and Kashmir in preceding years were the 2016 Uri attack and 2019 Pulwama attack. India blamed Pakistan-based militants for both of them and conducted retaliatory strikes. In the weeks preceding the Pahalgam attack, India acquired the extradition of former Pakistan Army officer Tahawwur Rana, who was linked to Lashkar-e-Taiba and convicted (in the US) for supporting the 2008 Mumbai attacks. Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir gave a speech describing Kashmir as "our jugular vein" and branding Hindus as being different from Muslims in every way via an appeal to the two-nation theory that lead to the partition of India. The Indian government and media have long alleged that Pakistan supports militant groups such as TRF. Pakistan denies any support for militants including those involved in Jammu and Kashmir, officially maintaining only "diplomatic and moral support" for the Kashmiri people. == Attack ==

, where the attack took place On 22 April 2025, at around 1 p.m. to 2:45 p.m. 2-7 terrorists entered the Baisaran Valley meadow, which is located about from the Pahalgam town in Anantnag district. The area is surrounded by dense pine forests on all sides, and is a popular spot for tourists; it is only accessible by foot or horseback. The meadow is about 200m wide and 800m long. The area was not protected by armed security. The attackers carried M4 carbines and AK-47s and wore military-style uniforms. One wore a Kashmiri pheran. They had modern communication equipment and mounted cameras. The meadow is surrounded by a 7-feet-high chain link fence. There are two gates for entry and exit. The attack started with shots being fired near the exit gate. Some tourists were killed outside the boundary. Some tourists who were not able to scale the fence were helped by others. Other tourists ran in different directions trying to find a place to hide such as behind the mobile toilets. An army officer on holiday helped to direct 35-40 tourists to safety. The video footage showed scenes of panic with injured victims pleading for help and bodies strewn across the ground. Another video of the attack was inadvertently captured by a tourist from Kozhikode who was waiting for a zipline ride; the time the video was taken was recorded as 2:25pm. Once realising the situation, he escaped by climbing over the fence and ran downhill. Following the killings the terrorists fired shots in the air, supposedly either warning shots or celebratory in nature. Targeted attack on Hindu tourists The militants asked for the names and religions of the tourists, Some tourists were asked to recite the Islamic verse of kalima, so that the militants could segregate them by religion. Some Hindu men were forced to remove their trousers to check for a lack of circumcision before being shot at close range. Out of the 26 dead, the trousers of around 20 were found to be unzipped or pulled down. The militants told some Hindu women that they were spared so that they could narrate the horrors of their men's killing to the Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi. The militants approached the couple and asked, "Are you a Hindu or a Muslim?" and Dwivedi responded that "We are Hindus" and was shot point-blank in the head. In a viral video of the attack, his wife is heard saying "a man suddenly came and said he's not Muslim... then shot him." The militants shot three bullets into Narwal's neck, chest and thighs "after realizing he was a Hindu". The wife of another victim from Andhra Pradesh told the state's deputy chief minister Pawan Kalyan that she and her husband lay on the ground, and the terrorists asked twice, "" (), and when they did not respond, her husband was shot dead. A Bengali Hindu professor from Assam, who hid his identity by reciting the Islamic kalima escaped the killing, while a Christian man from Madhya Pradesh was shot dead after being unable to recite the kalima. His wife said the attackers took selfies with the dead bodies. According to his son, there were 15-year-olds among the terrorists. Casualties At least 26 people were killed in the attack, including 25 tourists and one local person, while 20 others were injured. The full list of 26 victims with their names and state of residence was published by Indian newspapers. The victims included 24 tourists from several Indian states and one foreign tourist from Nepal, while the one local killed was from Jammu and Kashmir. Witnesses stated that most of the victims were male, and the dead and injured included those from the Indian states of Arunachal Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, Maharashtra, Odisha, Gujarat, Haryana, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, and West Bengal. One Christian victim was a resident of Madhya Pradesh. Members of the local pony-handlers association rescued 11 injured tourists on ponies and improvised stretchers. Gurudwaras in Kashmir opened their doors to shelter tourists fleeing the valley in fear, as many sought safety closer to cities and airports to return to their home states. Emergency services arrived at the scene after news of the attack reached district headquarters. A helpline was established to assist affected tourists. Nazakat Ahmad Ali Shah, a Kashmiri woollen clothes trader and tourist guide, helped to rescue several of the victims. He saved eleven people in a group, including the daughter of a BJP leader, by first taking two children to the nearby town of Pahalgam and then escorting the rest to safety. Nazakat Ahmad Ali Shah is the cousin of Syed Adil Hussain Shah, who died while saving the lives of many tourists in the attack. The nearest CRPF base is around 4-5 kilometers from the Baisaran meadows. The CRPF commanding officer was informed about the attack by pony operators. The first phone call to the police control room was later at 2:45 p.m. A joint cordon and search operation was launched by the Indian Army, paramilitary forces, and Jammu and Kashmir Police. A temporary lockdown was imposed in Pahalgam, and Indian Army helicopters were deployed to track down the militants, who reportedly fled to the upper reaches of the Pir Panjal range. On 24 April, an Indian soldier was killed and two other soldiers wounded during a gunfight with insurgents in the Basantgarh area of Udhampur. == Responsibility and motive ==

The Resistance Front (TRF) initially claimed responsibility for the attack, linking it to Indian government policy that allows non-Kashmiris to live and work in Kashmir, resulting in non-local settlement in Kashmir. In a statement on the social media platform Telegram, TRF opposed the granting of domicile certificates to "outsiders", and voiced discontent at resulting alleged demographic changes in the region. It claimed, "These non-locals arrive posing as tourists, obtain domiciles, and then begin to act as if they own the land. Consequently, violence will be directed toward those attempting to settle illegally." TRF has a history of targeting non-Kashmiris on such grounds. In June 2020, it released a statement saying, "any Indian who comes with an intention to settle in Kashmir will be treated as an agent of RSS and not as civilian and will be dealt with appropriately." In February 2021, it killed a Punjabi restaurateur's son, even though Punjabis are a well-established part of Srinagar's retail business, having arrived there well before 1947. According to political analyst and journalist Luv Puri, such killings of civilians are not condoned by the populace but the atmosphere of "mass-scale hysteria" in the Valley on potential demographic changes allows TRF to get away with them. A UN Security Council report on 29 July 2025 stated that TRF took responsibility on both 22 and 23 April. No other group claimed responsibility. Political-science professor and recognized expert on terrorism Max Abrahms wrote that the attack was indeed carried out by the TRF, noting his prior research revealing that terrorist groups commonly attempt false denials of responsibility for attacks that kill civilian targets, subsequently "backfire" in public opinion, and/or appear likely to trigger a robust military response. The United States designated the TRF as a terrorist organisation on 17 July. On 7 May 2025, the foreign secretary of India Vikram Misri stated in a press conference that the objective of the attack was to inflame communal violence in India and negatively impact the economy by attacking tourism in the union territory. == Investigations and operations ==

Indian investigations Based on eyewitness testimonies and details given by the survivors of the attack the Jammu and Kashmir police revealed the identities and sketches of four of the terrorists. Police confirmed that all of them have been linked to previous militancy-related incidents in the Poonch region. Following the attack, hundreds of former overground workers and ex-militants were interrogated in Kashmir. On 24 April, the J&K Police announced a bounty of () for information leading to the identification, arrest, or elimination of each of the individuals responsible for the Pahalgam attack, promising to protect the informant's identity. The National Investigative Agency (NIA) later released that the initial sketches of the militants were wrong. NIA arrived at the site to assist Jammu and Kashmir Police on 23 April. It formally took over the investigation from the J&K Police on 27 April following an order from the counter terrorism and counter radicalisation (CTCR) division of the ministry of home affairs. A case was registered under relevant sections of the Indian Justice Code and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. Indian authorities linked the Pahalgam attack to Pakistan, with digital traces leading to safe houses in Muzaffarabad and Karachi. They concluded that forensic evidence and intelligence intercepts suggest potential support from operatives based in Pakistan. Authorities conducted extensive searches in Indian-administered Kashmir, questioning more than 2,800 people and taking more than 150 into custody. In a preliminary report, the NIA concluded that the attack was committed under directives issued by senior operatives of Pakistan's intelligence agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). At least 15 locals were identified who helped facilitate the attack. Indian officials later said that the attackers belong to a TRF unit known as the "Falcon Squad". The Minister of Home Affairs Amit Shah explained in the Parliament that the Intelligence Bureau and the security forces in the region tracked the terrorists for over two months using a number of methods. In December 2025, NIA charged Pakistan-based militant groups Lashkar-e-Taiba and The Resistance Front, along with six individuals. The charges, submitted in a 1,597-page filing to a special court in Jammu, alleged that the groups planned, facilitated, and carried out the attack, tracing the conspiracy to Pakistan following an eight-month investigation. Three Pakistani men killed during an Indian security operation in July were charged posthumously. Treatment of potential witnesses According to former chief minister of Jammu and Kashmir Mehbooba Mufti, locals were "rounded up by security agencies and kept in custody for hours and sometimes the entire day without food" in what she saw as a form of collective punishment. Mufti stated that the locals "unanimously came out against this gruesome attack and unequivocally condemned it" and that "the blanket criminalization of locals not only alienates our people but also sows seeds of resentment and mistrust". Masterminds behind the attack Security agencies have identified three terrorists behind the Pahalgam terror attack. Two of them — Lashkar-e-Taiba chief Hafeez Saeed and his deputy Saifullah Khalid Kasuri — are in Pakistan, while the third, Hashim Moosa alias Suleiman Shah, is believed to be hiding in the forests of south Kashmir. An extensive operation is underway to capture him, with concerns that he may attempt to flee to Pakistan. Hashim Moosa, a former para-commando in Pakistan's Special Service Group, joined Lashkar-e-Taiba and has been involved in several terror attacks since infiltrating India in 2023. Authorities aim to capture him alive to confirm Pakistan's involvement in the attack. He was involved in a deadly October attack in Ganderbal that killed seven and another in Baramulla where four security personnel died. In total, he has been linked to at least six terror attacks in Jammu and Kashmir. The head of TRF, Sajad Ahmad Sheikh alias Sajad Gul, has also been named as a mastermind. He resides in Pakistan. The NIA designated Gul a terrorist in April 2022. Property in Kashmir belonging to Sajad Gul was attached following the Pahalgam attack. The duo were produced before a special NIA court on 23 June 2025. During questioning, Parvaiz and Bashir disclosed details about the terrorists. Shafat Maqbool Wani was taken into custody by the NIA in July 2025 under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act in Handwara. It is believed that he received money from TRF to support terrorism. LeT associates Ab Majid Gojri and Ab Hamid Dar were apprehended by J&K Police on 17 August 2025. They were in possession of two Chinese grenades, two UBGL grenades, and ten rounds of AKs. NIA raided their homes on 20 August 2025, discovering records of foreign funding. NIA has recovered information from mobile data, social media chats, bank transactions, and call logs during raids in Srinagar and Handwara about TRF receiving approximately ₹9 lakh in funding through Malaysian resident Yasir Hayat, who has connections to Sajid Mir's network, a LeT most wanted terrorist who is suspected of planning the 2008 Mumbai attacks. 463 phone calls connected to anti-India groups and extremist followers regarding the financing of TRF from Pakistan, Malaysia, and Arab states of the Persian Gulf were revealed by NIA on 3 September 2025. On 24 September, Srinagar Police arrested a key LeT operative from South Kashmir's Kulgam district for providing logistical support to terrorists killed in the Operation Mahadev. The accused has been identified as 26-year-old Mohammad Yousuf Kataria, a seasonal teacher and resident of Kulgam. According to police, Yousuf was actively associated with LeT/TRF and had supplied equipment and other logistical support to terrorists operating in Pahalgam. Forensic examination of a phone charger proved vital to his arrest. Kataria revealed that he met with the terrorists at least four times in the Zabarwan hills. Indian operations Operation Mahadev Operation Mahadev was launched on the day of the Pahalgam attack. Baisaran Valley is at least 220 km from the Line of Control. On 28 July 2025, in a joint operation under Operation Mahadev, security forces including CRPF, J&K Police, and the army, killed three terrorists, namely Suleman Shah alias Faizal Jatt, Abu Hamza and Yasir in the Harwan jungles close to Mahadev Ridge in Dachigam. Rashtriya Rifles and Para Special Forces personnel ascended Mahadev hill and took up positions. Three hours later and following visual identification, shots were fired at the terrorists. Three mobile phones and two communication sets were retrieved; additionally, a GoPro body camera harness, a 28-watt solar charger, three mobile chargers, a Swiss military power bank, needles and threads, medicines, stove, dry food, tea and two Aadhaar cards belonging to two local residents of Ganderbal and Srinagar were also recovered. The Pakistani identity of the three terrorists was alleged by the Indian Home Minister Amit Shah in the Parliament. The three slain attackers that carried the alias—Suleiman, Hamza Afghani, and Jibran—were identified by detained individuals who had previously supplied them with food. Further confirmation came from the recovery of Pakistani voter identity cards and Pakistan-manufactured chocolates Candyland and Chocomax found in their possession. The batch numbers were traced to a May 2024 consignment shipped to Muzaffarabad. On the bodies of Suleman Shah and Abu Hamza, two laminated voter ID slips from the Election Commission of Pakistan had serial numbers connected to the Lahore (NA-125) and Gujranwala electoral rolls (NA-79). Biometric information from Pakistan's National Database and Registration Authority was found on a micro-SD card that was recovered from a broken satellite phone. Facial templates, fingerprints, family tree, registered addresses in Koiyan village, and Changa Manga, were recovered. The allegations of attackers being of Pakistan-origin were denied by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Pakistan as 'replete with fabrications', as Pakistan does not issue voter-ID cards and instead requires voters to carry CNICs to participate in any given election. The Wire questioned the presence of Pakistani chocolates considering that an official had stated that the terrorists had entered India from Pakistan three years ago. Suleiman Shah was labelled as the mastermind of the Pahalgam attack. Following the deaths of the terrorists, their weapons were sent to Central Forensic Science Laboratory for forensic firearm examination. The striation patterns on the three AK-103s recovered from the terrorists matched the 7.62×39mm round casings that were analyzed and discovered at the Baisaran Valley. Independent investigation Following India's allegations of Pakistani involvement in the attack, Pakistan proposed the establishment of a neutral, independent, third-party investigation, to be conducted by an impartial body, while condemning the attack as a tragedy. Simultaneously, it accused India of exacerbating regional tensions. Pakistan's call for an unbiased inquiry received backing from Turkey, China, Malaysia's Anwar Ibrahim, Switzerland and Greece. However, India categorically rejected the proposal, dismissing the notion of an independent investigation. Meanwhile, a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed in India which sought a judicial investigation. The Supreme Court justice Surya Kant rejected the calls, stating that the court's role was to decide disputes, not to conduct investigations. Independently, investigative journalists from ThePrint found that the demand for the high-resolution satellite imagery of Pahalgam area surged at Maxar two months before the Pahalgam attack. The period of the surge coincided with the joining of a Pakistani geospatial firm, Business Systems International (BSI), as a 'partner' with Maxar. The firm's owner Obaidullah Syed was previously convicted for illegally exporting computer equipment and software to Pakistani government agencies. == Response ==

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi cut short his visit to Saudi Arabia and returned to India to chair a meeting with the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) on the issue. After this meeting, the Indian foreign secretary, Vikram Misri, briefed senior diplomats around the world regarding five major decisions made by the Indian government. He announced India would immediately suspend the Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan until Pakistan ceases its support for cross-border terrorism. He further announced the closure of the main border crossing between the two countries, a travel ban of all Pakistani nationals to India under the SAARC Visa Exemption Scheme, and a cancellation of all previously issued visas. Pakistani military advisers at the High Commission of Pakistan in New Delhi were expelled, and their Indian counterparts in Islamabad were withdrawn. Union home minister Amit Shah travelled to Srinagar to assess the situation and coordinate the security response, and later travelled to the site of the attack. The government later admitted a security lapse revealing that Baisaran Valley had been opened to tourists two months ahead of schedule without notifying security forces, a factor which facilitated the attack. There were no security personnel present on the day of the attack at the site. On 24 April, the central government convened an all-party meeting to brief opposition parties in the wake of the attack. Opposition leaders criticised the oversight and Modi's absence from the briefing. On the same day India briefed envoys from G20 countries and strategic partners. Pakistan also warned India of a comprehensive retaliation in response to the actions announced by the Indian government in the aftermath of the incident. On 24 April, Pakistan suspended visas issued to Indian nationals and closed its airspace to Indian aircraft. On the night between 24 and 25 April, Pakistani and Indian troops skirmished and exchanged small arms fire at multiple positions along the line of control. Small arms fire continued for the next few days. In an escalation, small arms fire was reported across the international border as well on 30 April. India launched Operation Sindoor on 7 May, striking nine targets in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir. India said it delivered precision strikes on terrorist infrastructure while Pakistan said that the operation resulted in civilian casualties on the Pakistani side. In response, Pakistan launched drone and missiles strikes around Indian-administered Kashmir. Residents of Indian-administered Kashmir stated that civilians had been killed in shelling from the Pakistani side of the border. By 30 April the Ministry of External Affairs of India had briefed envoys of 45 nations on the attack. India also organized seven all-party delegations consisting of 51 members-of-parliament and former diplomats to visit 33 capitals across the world to convey India's stance on terrorism and the counter-terror operation Sindoor. The lower and upper houses of the Parliament of India held a debate on the Pahalgam attack and Operation Sindoor on 28 and 29 July respectively. 16 hours was allocated for debate for each house. The first news of the terrorists being killed on 28 July was made public by the Home Minister in the Lok Sabha on 29 July. As a result of the attack, state police forces began an extensive drive to search and deport illegal immigrants from Pakistan and Bangladesh. Consequently, following Operation Sindoor, several illegal Pakistani and Bangladeshi immigrants were arrested nationwide and deported. An investigation revealed that many of these illegal immigrants had reportedly possessed voter IDs and ration cards, sparking a major controversy and debate as non-citizens do not have right to vote. == Reactions ==

Domestic reactions Tourism Following the attack, an increase in the number of visitors leaving Jammu and Kashmir was recorded, prompting Air India to operate additional flights to the region. Furthermore, numerous tourist destinations in the region were closed. Months after the attack several tourist sites remained closed. As compared to the same period in 2024 tourist numbers dropped by just over 50% in 2025. In the recent past, tourism has been an indicator of 'normalcy' in the region for the government. On 24 April an all-party meet in Srinagar was held where the attack was condemned. On 25 April, Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, in his Friday sermon at Srinagar's Jamia Masjid, said that Kashmiris "stand shoulder to shoulder with the victims." A minute of silence was observed before prayers in memory of those killed. On 28 April, a special session of the Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly was held; a three-page resolution with regard to the attack was passed and two minutes of silence was observed. The assembly endorsed the diplomatic measures taken following the meeting of the Cabinet Committee on Security. Numerous celebrities also denounced the attack. Various Indian cities, such as Delhi, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, among others, witnessed candlelight vigils and silent marches to honour the victims. Prominent Muslim organisations, such as Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind, denounced the attack, stating that it contradicted Islam's promotion of peace. The All India Imam Organisation stated that they would be instructing the imams of over 5.5 lakh mosques to pray for the victims and strongly condemn terrorism during Friday prayers. Particularly, Kashmiri women and students have faced incidents of threats, harassment, heckling, and assaults from far-right Hindutva groups. In states such as Uttarakhand, Punjab, and Uttar Pradesh, Kashmiri tenants faced eviction from their rented accommodations, and shopkeepers refused to trade with them. Several Kashmiri students were forced to seek refuge in airports while attempting to return home. In Dehradun, the leader of the Hindu Raksha Dal, a far-right Hindutva organisation, issued a threat, warning that Kashmiri Muslims must leave or face unspecified consequences. He also announced plans to mobilise workers to act against them. The state government of Haryana, led by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), issued directives to ensure the safety of Kashmiri students. However, several BJP members and leaders have also been linked to the rise in hate speech and violence following the attack, including public calls for economic boycotts, inflammatory mosque protests, and assaults on Muslim vendors. Affiliates like the Bajrang Dal and the Vishva Hindu Parishad have also staged protests featuring similar rhetoric. Furthermore, calls were raised to deport illegal immigrants from Pakistan and Bangladesh. she was subsequently met with widespread online harassment and trolling, which was condemned by India's National Commission for Women. Sikh volunteers have assisted Kashmiri Muslims by providing safe spaces, food, and transportation, who have faced hostility in various parts of India following the terror attack. The Supreme Court of India condemned the attack and held two minutes of silence. The attack also brought to question the narrative of "normalcy" in Indian-administered Kashmir. Political leaders The attack drew immediate widespread condemnation from political leaders. Indian president Droupadi Murmu called it a "dastardly and inhuman act." Vice-president Jagdeep Dhankhar called the act "reprehensible" and condemned it. Chief minister of Jammu and Kashmir Omar Abdullah described the incident as "much larger than anything we've seen directed at civilians in recent years." Defence minister Rajnath Singh labelled it an "act of cowardice." External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar called the religious violence an act of economic warfare targeting tourism. International reactions The attack drew condemnations and statements of condolences from several countries including: Argentina, Australia, Bahrain, Belgium, Estonia, Egypt, France, Germany, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Kuwait, Malaysia, Maldives, Mauritius, Moldova, New Zealand, Oman, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, the United States, Uzbekistan, Vietnam, and India's neighbours including Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, China, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. This included calls from at least 16 foreign leaders. The United Nations, the UN Security Council, G7 and the European Union issued similar statements. The Liberian parliament held a moment of silence in memory of the attack. On 29 April, in the Parliament of the United Kingdom, in response to an urgent question on Pahalgam and the increasing tensions in Kashmir several members of Parliament presented statements and condemned the attack. Iran offered to mediate. The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom condemned the Pahalgam attack and its Commissioner stated that "We are deeply concerned by the explicit targeting of Hindus and other non-Muslims". The United States House Committee on Foreign Affairs criticised a New York Times headline for using the word 'militant' instead of 'terrorist'. There has also been wider criticism with other international publications as well regarding the use of terms such as 'gunmen' and 'militants' as compared to 'terrorists'. On 25 April, President Trump said that Pakistan and India will sort out the tension by themselves. Tulsi Gabbard, American politician and director of national intelligence, called the attack Islamist terrorism and said that US stands with India as the terrorists are hunted down. At least 100 United States' lawmakers have reacted to the attacks including United States National Security Advisor Mike Waltz, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and director of the FBI Kash Patel. On 17 June, the Financial Action Task Force, which observes the global money laundering and terror financing activities, issued a statement condemning the Pahalgam terrorist attack, noting that such attacks cannot occur "without money and the means to move funds between terrorist supporters". Expressing "grave concern" over the incident, the organization noted that such incidents show that terrorists continue to "kill, maim and inspire fear around the world." On 6 July 2025, BRICS strongly condemned the attack during the 17th BRICS summit. On 1 September 2025, the leaders of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation strongly condemned the terror attack and "further stated that perpetrators, organizers and sponsors of such attacks must be brought to justice". At the IBSA Dialogue Forum the ministers of the three countries condemned the attack. Pakistan Pakistani defence minister Khawaja Asif dismissed the allegations of his country's involvement in the attack, stating it was a homegrown insurgent attack and that the attacks may have been orchestrated by India as a false flag operation. Post Pahalgam attack the hashtags #IndianFalseFlag and #PahalgamDramaExposed trended briefly on the social media platform X with a majority of posts originating from Pakistan. In an interview with Sky News, the defence minister acknowledged that the Pakistani state has a history of funding, training, and supporting terrorist organisations, noting that Pakistan has "done the dirty work for the United States for about three decades. And West, including Britain." Pakistan deputy prime minister and foreign minister Ishaq Dar said the perpetrators may have been "freedom fighters". With regard to TRF initially taking responsibility for the attack, Ishaq Dar stated in the Parliament of Pakistan, "We don't consider TRF illegal. Show us proof they carried out the Pahalgam attack. Show ownership by TRF. We won't accept the allegation." Pakistan also successfully opposed mention of TRF in a UNSC release. On 26 April, the Senate of Pakistan passed a resolution describing the attack as an "orchestrated campaign to malign Pakistan". It also referred to the Indus Water Treaty and India's action regarding it as water terrorism and an act of war. == See also ==