A related concept is that of
isolating languages, which are those with a low morpheme-per-word ratio (taking into account
derivational morphemes as well). Purely isolating languages are by definition analytic and lack inflectional morphemes. However, the reverse is not necessarily true, and a language can have derivational morphemes but lack inflectional morphemes. For example,
Mandarin Chinese has many
compound words, which gives it a moderately high ratio of morphemes per word, but since it has almost no inflectional affixes at all to convey grammatical relationships; it is a very analytic language. English is not totally analytic in its nouns, since it uses inflections for number (e.g., "one day, three days; one boy, four boys") and possession ("The boy's ball" vis-à-vis "The boy has a ball"). Mandarin Chinese, by contrast, has no inflections on its nouns: Compare 'one day', 'three days' (literally 'three day'); 'one boy' (lit. 'one [entity of] male child'), 'four boys' (lit. 'four [entity of] male child'). However, English is considered weakly inflected, and comparatively more analytic than most other
Indo-European languages.
Persian is a synthetic language, not an analytical one. It has some features of agglutination, making use of prefixes and suffixes attached to the stems of verbs and nouns, thus making it a synthetic language rather than an analytic one. It is also an SOV (subject, object, and then verb) language, thus having a head-final phrase structure. Example in Persian:
Kuchiktarinhayeshunra barnemigardundam meaning
I wouldn’t return the smallest ones of them (literally 'Small+diminutive+comparative+superlative+plural+possessive+object_marker re+not+ing+turn+to+did+I') == List of analytic languages ==