MarketSparassodonta
Company Profile

Sparassodonta

Sparassodonta is an extinct order of carnivorous metatherian mammals native to South America, related to modern marsupials. They were once considered to be true marsupials, but are now thought to be a separate side branch that split before the last common ancestor of all modern marsupials.

Anatomy
'', from the late middle Miocene of Colombia Almost all sparassodonts have an exceptionally shortened snout—most especially thylacosmylids. Hathliacynids usually have a longer snout than the other groups. The nasal bones extend past the eye sockets, often reaching the lacrimal bone. Except for thylacosmylids beyond Patagosmilus, sparassodonts feature an open eye socket, with more marginalized (though nonetheless prominent) postorbital processes which would otherwise form the postorbital bar connecting the forehead to the cheek, thus framing the eye. They exhibit marked postorbital constriction. The orbital process (between the cheek and the eye socket) is usually diminished, though the zygomatic arch (the cheekbone) is strong. They feature a prominent sagittal crest along the midline of the flattened skull, the crest strength is quite variable among borhyaenids. They have an expanded occipital bone with a well defined nuchal crest. Sparassodonts spanned a wide range of body sizes, from 2.2-pound (1 kg) weasel or civet-like forms to Thylacosmilus, which was the size of a leopard. The largest known sparassodont was Proborhyaena which was about the size of a spectacled bear. Along with the Australian thylacoleonids, sparassodonts include some of the largest metatherian carnivores. to the point that early analysis could not even find evidence for them. This is a characteristic shared with the Australian thylacine, and historically argued as a synapomorphy, Some specimens of Borhyaena and Arctodictis are also missing the last upper molar, showing that the presence of this tooth was variable in these species. In thylacosmilids, only the lower third premolar was replaced. The cusps of the sparassodont molar correlate to a cutting function rather than a crushing one. In the upper molars, the paracone (on the lingual, or tongueward, side) is reduced and fused to the metacone (distal, towards the back of the mouth), inflating the postmetacrista (the lingual border of the metacone); and they almost always lack the stylar shelf (on the buccal, or cheekward, side) and associated stylar cusps. In the lower molars, the trigonids (the buccal shearing side) have an inflated paracristid and marginalized or absent metaconid; and the talonid (the distal, or backendwards, crushing side) is either reduced or gone. ==Taxonomy==
Taxonomy
Classification Sparassodonts can be divided into six major groups; basal sparassodonts (?earliest Paleocene-late Miocene), species that cannot be easily assigned to any of the other sparassodont groups and whose teeth often exhibit adaptations for omnivory; hathliacynids (late Oligocene-early Pliocene/late Pliocene), which range from a marten to a thylacine in size, and have long, fox-like muzzles and teeth strongly suited for carnivory; basal borhyaenoids (middle Eocene-late Miocene), borhyaenoids which are unable to be easily classified into the families Borhyaenidae, Thylacosmilidae, or Proborhyaenidae and range in form and size; borhyaenids (early-late Miocene), the sparassodont group most specialized for running, but not as much as living carnivorans or even thylacines; proborhyaenids (middle Eocene-late Oligocene), robust, wolverine-like forms with ever-growing upper and lower canines; and thylacosmilids (early Miocene-late Pliocene), another terrestrially specialized group with ever-growing saber-like upper canines. with additions from more recent studies. however more recent studies show it to be closely related to sparassodonts. The exact age of most Eocene species of sparassodonts is uncertain, given the lack of precise stratigraphic information associated with most specimens and the recent division of the Casamayoran SALMA into the Vacan and Barrancan SALMAs. • Order Sparassodonta • Genus AllqokirusPatene coluapiensis (middle Eocene, Barrancan SALMA) • Patene simpsoni (late Paleocene/early Eocene, Itaboraian SALMA) • Genus ProcladosictisProcladosictis anomala (late Eocene, Mustersan SALMA) • Family Hondadelphidae • Genus HondadelphysHondadelphys fieldsi (late middle Miocene, Laventan SALMA) • Genus StylocynusStylocynus paranensis (latest Miocene, Huayquerian SALMA) • Family Hathliacynidae • Genus AcyonAcyon ?herrerae (early Miocene, Colhuehuapian SALMA) • Acyon myctoderos (late middle Miocene, Laventan SALMA) • Acyon tricuspidatus (late early Miocene, Santacrucian SALMA) • Genus AustralogaleAustralogale leptognathus (late middle Miocene, Laventan SALMA) • Genus BorhyaenidiumBorhyaenidium altiplanicus (latest Miocene, Huayquerian SALMA) • Borhyaenidium riggsi (unknown, either early or late Pliocene, Montehermosan or Chapadmalalan SALMA) • Borhyaenidium musteloides (latest Miocene, Huayquerian SALMA) • Genus ChasicostylusChasicostylus castroi (early late Miocene, Chasicoan SALMA) • Genus CladosictisCladosictis centralis (early Miocene, Colhuehuapian SALMA) • Cladosictis patagonica (late early to earliest middle Miocene, Santacrucian-Friasian SALMA) • Genus NotictisNotictis ortizi (latest Miocene, Huayquerian SALMA) • Genus NotocynusNotocynus hermosicus (early Pliocene, Montehermosan SALMA) • Genus NotogaleNotogale mitis (late Oligocene, Deseadan SALMA) • Genus PseudonotictisPseudonotictis chubutensis (early middle Miocene, Colloncuran SALMA) • Pseudonotictis pusillus (late early Miocene, Santacrucian SALMA) • Genus PerathereutesPerathereutes pungens (late early Miocene, Santacrucian SALMA) • Genus SallacyonSallacyon hoffstetteri (late Oligocene, Deseadan SALMA) • Genus SipalocyonSipalocyon externus (early Miocene, Colhuehuapian SALMA) • Sipalocyon gracilis (late early Miocene, Santacrucian SALMA) • Sipalocyon "obusta" (late early Miocene, Santacrucian SALMA) • Superfamily Borhyaenoidea • Genus AngelocabrerusAngelocabrerus daptes (middle Eocene) • Genus ChlorocyonChlorocyon phantasma (late Eocene, Mustersan SALMA) • Genus DukecynusDukecynus magnus (late middle Miocene, Laventan SALMA) • Genus EomakhairaEomakhaira molossus (early Oligocene, ?Tinguirirican SALMA) • Genus BorhyaenaBorhyaena macrodonta (early Miocene, Colhuehuapian SALMA) • Borhyaena tuberata (late early Miocene, Santacrucian SALMA) • ?Genus EutemnodusFamily Proborhyaenidae • Genus Arminiheringia • Genus CallistoeCallistoe vincei (middle Eocene, Vacan-Barrancan SALMA) • Genus ParaborhyaenaParaborhyaena boliviana (late Oligocene, Deseadan SALMA) • Genus ProborhyaenaProborhyaena gigantea (late Oligocene, Deseadan SALMA) • Unranked clade Thylacosmiliformes • Genus DimartiniaDimartinia pristina (late Miocene, Chasicoan SALMA) • Family Thylacosmilidae • Genus AnachlysictisAnachlysictis gracilis (late middle Miocene, Laventan SALMA) • Genus PatagosmilusPatagosmilus goini (early middle Miocene, Colloncuran SALMA) • Genus ThylacosmilusThylacosmilus atrox (latest Miocene to late Pliocene, Huayquerian-Chapadmalalan SALMA) Several other metatherian taxa have been suggested to be sparassodonts or closely related to sparassodonts. The australian Murgon taxa Archaeonothos has been noted as being similar to sparassodonts, but currently its relationships are not fully concluded. Carneiro (2018) recovered the genus Varalphadon from the Late Cretaceous of North America as a basal member of Sparassodonta. However, this interpretation of Varalphadon as a sparassodont has not been supported by later phylogenetic analyses, and most of the purported synapomorphies between Varalphadon and sparassodonts are not actually present in Varalphadon or have been suggested to be due to convergent evolution. Not all studies agree on the sister group relationship between Thylacosmilidae and Borhyaenidae recovered here, with other studies finding thylacosmilids to be within Proborhyaenidae. }}Cladogram of Borhyaenoidea after Suarez et al. 2025, who coined the clade Thylacosmiliformes to encompass Dimartinia and Thylacosmilidae:Within Metatheria, a 2016 phylogenetic analysis group found that borhyaenids form a clade with the Asian "Gurlin Tsav skull" as well as other South American taxa. The same phylogeny found that marsupials group among various North American Cretaceous species. The phylogenetic tree is reproduced below. }} Evolution '' (Borhyaenidae) The early history of the Sparassodonta is poorly known, as most Paleocene and Eocene members of this group are only known from isolated teeth and fragmentary jaws. However, one species, the middle Eocene Callistoe vincei, is known from a nearly complete, articulated skeleton. As Callistoe belongs to one of the most specialized groups of sparassodonts, this indicates that the other major groups (e.g. borhyaenids, hathliacynids, etc.) must have also arisen by this time. Originally, the early Paleocene metatherian Mayulestes was considered to be the earliest known member of the Sparassodonta, but phylogenetic analyses suggest that this species represents an independent radiation of carnivorous metatherians more closely related to Pucadelphys; however, recent studies show that these taxa were closely related to borhyaenids. As of this writing, the earliest known true sparassodonts are either Allqokirus australis, a species from the same site as Mayulestes that may turn out to not be a sparassodont, and an isolated astragalus from the earliest Paleocene site of Punta Peligro, Argentina. Sparassodonts have been suggested to be related to a variety of other groups of metatherians. Florentino Ameghino, who first described fossils of the group, thought that sparassodonts were closely related to creodonts and were a transitional group between metatherians and carnivorous placentals (including modern carnivorans). The most popular hypothesis for much of the 20th century was that sparassodonts were closely related to opossums. In 1990, Marshall et al. (1990) considered the Cretaceous stagodontids to be members of Sparassodonta, but this was criticized by later authors. Marshall and Kielan-Jaworowska (1992) considered sparassodonts to be closely related to deltatheroidans, but this was also criticized. Most of these hypotheses were based on similar adaptations for carnivorous diets in sparassodonts, opossums, dasyuromorphians, stagodonts, and deltatheroidans, which are highly prone to convergent evolution within mammals. Szalay (1994) considered sparassodonts to be closely related to paucituberculatans based on features of the ankle. In recent years there has been a growing consensus that sparassodonts are positioned just outside of crown-group Marsupialia, in a broader clade (Pucadelphyida) including pucadelphyids as well as sparassodonts. ==Paleobiology==
Paleobiology
Diet '', a large specialised sabre-toothed sparassodont Sparassodonts were carnivorous, and with the exception of some basal members of all members of this group were hypercarnivorous (having diets composed of more than 70% meat). Only Hondadelphys and Stylocynus appear to have exhibited adaptations for omnivory, and even then Stylocynus may have had a more mesocarnivorous diet similar to canids than an omnivorous one. Sparassodont coprolites from the Santa Cruz Formation preserve the bones of chinchillid and octodontoid rodents inside them. Bite marks from medium-sized sparassodonts have been found on the small notoungulate Paedotherium. Stable isotope data from the early late Miocene Lycopsis viverensis and Thylacosmilus atrox suggests that these species fed on C3 grazers in open habitats, likely notoungulates. Bite marks likely pertaining to hathliacynid sparassodonts have been found on the remains of penguins and flightless marine ducks in ancient seabird nesting colonies, suggesting that sparassodonts raided seabird colonies for eggs, carrion, and other prey like many predatory mammals do today. Borhyaenid and proborhyaenid sparassodonts have been interpreted as being capable of crushing bones similar to modern hyenas, wolverines, or the Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) based on their deep jaws, bulbous premolars with deep roots and pronounced wear at their tips, extensive fused or interlocking mandibular symphyses, large masseteric fossae, microfractures in their tooth enamel, and high estimated bite forces. Australohyaena antiquua shows particularly pronounced adaptations for bone-cracking, with a very deep jaw and strongly arched nasals similar to what is seen in modern hyaenids. Most sparassodonts were plantigrade, Borhyaena has been suggested to have been digitigrade but this has been questioned. this has been supported by fossil tracks. One unusual aspect of sparassodont paleoecology is that at most fossil localities their remains are nearly ten times rarer than would be expected based on comparisons with carnivorous mammals at fossil sites in other parts of the world. The exact reasons for this are not clear, though this appears to be a broader pattern applicable to other groups of Cenozoic South American terrestrial carnivores (i.e., terror birds). However, this has not been tested further. Sparassodonts have relatively large and complex brains for metatherians, comparable to those of some Australian marsupials like Australian possums, though the body masses used to produce these estimates of relative brain size are low compared later studies suggesting these values could be overestimated. A 2025 endocast analysis reveals that some morphological characters found in extant marsupials were present in stem marsupials such as sparassodonts. It also reveals that hathliacynids had similar EQ to the extant didelphids, on the other hand, large borhyaenoids had small brain cases for their size. Wounds have been documented on the face of specimens of Borhyaena tuberata and Sipalocyon gracilis, potentially suggesting aggressive habits similar to the modern Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii). Senses Sparassodonts appear to have had very little binocular vision, with borhyaenids having the greatest degree of depth perception (but still lower than modern carnivorans) and the eyes of Thylacosmilus facing almost completely to the sides. However, later studies have found that Thylacosmilus likely held its head in a downward-facing position, which would have allowed for more binocular vision than previously thought. Pathology Several specimens of hathliacynids (Sipalocyon and Cladosictis) show a pathological disorder characterized by the presence of growths on the surface of the mandible, which in the most extreme cases can result in the loss of several teeth due to bony pathological growths. Extinction After the middle Miocene, sparassodonts began to slowly decline in diversity. Basal borhyaenoids are last known from the early late Miocene (Pseudolycopsis cabrerai and Lycopsis viverensis), and after this time were at least partially replaced by large-bodied basal sparassodonts such as Stylocynus. Some have proposed that this shift in dominance was because of the more omnivorous habits of basal sparassodonts, which may have been more adapted to the more seasonal South American climates of the late Neogene. Borhyaenids are last known from the latest Miocene, though only fragmentary remains of this group are known from this period. Later remains assigned to this group have since been reidentified as thylacosmilids or procyonids. By the Pliocene, only two families of sparassodonts remained in South America, the Hathliacynidae and the Thylacosmilidae. Pliocene hathliacynid remains are rare, and it is possible that these animals may have competed with the large carnivorous didelphids such as Lutreolina that appeared around this time. Hathliacynids are last definitively known from the early Pliocene, though their remains are rare. The thylacosmilids, on the other hand, were more successful and abundant, being some of the only large mammalian carnivores in South America during the Pliocene, before dying out during a faunal turnover in the middle of the epoch (the youngest specimens of thylacosmilids are ~3.3 Ma). Sparassodonts did coexist with Cyonasua-group procyonids during the late Miocene and Pliocene, but Cyonasua-group procyonids appear to have been primarily omnivorous and filled ecological niches that sparassodonts never occupied, which may be one reason that these animals were able to colonize South America despite the diverse predator guild in the late Miocene. The overall decline in sparassodont diversity from the Late Miocene to the end of the Pliocene may be linked to the climatic cooling that characterised the Late Neogene and the onset of the Quaternary glaciation. Additionally, the increased aridity of South America caused by the uplift of the Andes was likely responsible as well. ==References==
tickerdossier.comtickerdossier.substack.com