The Bevanite movement emerged from the earlier "
Keep Left" group, which had formed in 1947 around the New Statesman journal and published pamphlets critiquing the Labour government's policies. The Keep Left group had attempted through discussion and pamphlets to produce practical proposals informed by socialist values, and their concerns about government economic and international policies showed affinities with later Bevanite positions. The main Bevanite objectives were:
Economic and Social Policy •
State ownership of the "
commanding heights of the economy". Many nationalisations had made up the bedrock of Labour's previous manifestos, such as "Let us face the future". Bevanites' views towards nationalisation mirrored those of Vladimir Lenin, in that state control was only seen as necessary in the context of exchange or distribution, as opposed to the total and immediate appropriation of as much private property as possible. • A comprehensive and completely free '
cradle to grave'
system of welfare,
health provision and
education. This reflected their commitment to preserving and extending the welfare state established by the 1945 Labour government. •
Housing for all. Bevan, as Minister of Housing, had taken steps to repair war damage to housing, provide prefabricated housing and grant subsidies to local authorities to enable them to offer homes available for rent. •
Full employment. The Keep Left pamphlets had emphasised the importance of manpower management and maintaining the gains made since 1945. • The nationalisation of the steel industry, contrary to the views of many colleagues. • Greater industrial democracy and workers' control of nationalized industries, which Bevan believed were governed unconstitutionally due to their lack of public accountability.
Political Philosophy and Approach • Contempt for
dogma as a modus operandi; an open-minded approach to
democratic socialism. The Keep Left pamphlets advocated for a form of socialism that "does not, like communism, mean transferring the economic power of the all-powerful capitalist to an all-powerful Party" but rather "distributing economic power between three groups: the democratic representatives in Parliament and on the local authorities; enlightened management; and the workers themselves." • Respect for the arts and cultural policy. This reflected a broader vision of socialism that encompassed cultural as well as economic transformation. • A complementary ability to drop unpopular policies when necessary, demonstrating pragmatic flexibility. • Freedom of debate, opinion and criticism within the Labour Party. The group valued discussion and debate as essential to developing alternative policy proposals.
Defence and International Relations • General unwillingness to yield upon the perceived gains made since 1945, for example, opposition to means testing for social security benefits, and opposition to prescription charges as military spending increased. The Bevanite Group coalesced following Bevan's resignation from the Cabinet in 1951 when the health service started charging for previously free services such as spectacles in order to help pay for Britain's involvement in the Korean War. • Scepticism towards most American foreign policy, especially the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization and West German rearmament. The Keep Left pamphlet had advocated a democratic socialist "third force" foreign policy, with a socialist Europe acting independently from either the United States or the Soviet Union, against the pro-American foreign policy of Labour foreign secretary Ernest Bevin. • Opposition to high defence expenditure, especially for nuclear weapons, and calls for better relations with the Soviet Union. However, the movement later split over nuclear weapons when Bevan began advocating the maintenance of Britain's nuclear deterrent, saying that without them a future British foreign secretary would be going "naked into the conference chamber."
Organisational Method • Bevanites organised in Constituency Labour Parties across Britain, and set up local discussion groups known as "Brains Trusts", a legacy of the "Keep Left" group. These organised in support of Tribune magazine, allocating left-wing MPs and campaigners to form speaking panels around the country. •
Tribune magazine provided an important print voice for Bevanite politicians and was in wide circulation among party activists. The Bevanites represented what they considered to be "real Socialism" and maintained strong support among constituency Labour parties, though the Gaitskellites typically won most of the battles inside Parliament, while Bevanism was stronger among local Labour activists. == Party role ==