MarketAfrican historiography
Company Profile

African historiography

African historiography is a branch of historiography involving the study of the theories, methods, sources, and interpretations used by scholars to construct histories of Africa. Most African societies recorded their history via oral tradition, resulting in a lack of written records documenting events before European colonialism. African historiography has therefore lent itself to contemporary methods of historiographical study, the utilisation of oral sources, and the incorporation of evidence derived from various auxiliary disciplines, differentiating it from other continental areas of historiography due to its multidisciplinary nature.

The concept of Africa
There are vast amounts of ecological, cultural, linguistical, and religious diversity in Africa. Valentin Mudimbe notes that the idea of Africa was first made and used by non-Africans, particularly Europeans. The concept was appropriated by diasporic Africans during abolitionist movements in the 19th century as intellectuals sought an "African homeland", with their removal from the continent enabling them to view it as a whole. This planted the roots of pan-Africanist thought, however for most it was the shared experience of colonial rule and resistance to it that fostered a unified African identity. == History ==
History
Traditional oral and early written history In Africa, historiography has traditionally been undertaken by oral historians, who can range from professional specialists, such as the griots of West Africa, to amateur generalists, such as the bulaam ("men of memory") of the Kuba people. In African societies, the historical process is largely a communal one, with eyewitness accounts, hearsay, reminiscences, and occasionally visions, dreams, and hallucinations crafted into narrative oral traditions which are performed, sometimes accompanied by music, and transmitted through generations. In oral tradition, time is sometimes mythical and social, and ancestors were considered historical actors. Traditions can be recorded in the form of epics (which use formal speech), narratives (everyday speech), and poetry (which tends to be formulaic and memorised word for word). Some African writing systems have been developed or adapted in ancient and recent history. One of the most notable ancient scripts were the hieroglyphs of Ancient Egypt, which are attested to have been used for historical records from . Following the discovery of the Rosetta Stone in 1799, historians were able to decipher hieroglyphs and access a new field of Ancient Egyptian history, however this work was undertaken predominantly by European historians. Some ancient external sources include Periplus of the Erythraean Sea () and Ptolemy's Geography (). In Abyssinia, during the Aksumite period ( – CE) histories were inscribed in Geʽez on stelae, thrones, and obelisks, and recounted a ruler's reign, recording various historical events such as military campaigns, diplomatic missions, and acts of philanthropy. From the 13th century, written imperial chronicles predominated, such as the Chronicles of the Wars of Amda Sion (14th c.). Following the spread of Islam, there are also plenty of written records in Arabic from Islamic scholars such as al-Masudi, al-Idrisi, Leo Africanus, al-Bakri, Ibn Battuta, and Ibn Furtu. They included observations of local societies, and sometimes utilised oral sources, embodying bias towards Muslim rulers while denigrating non-believers. In West Africa and the Swahili coast Africans used Arabic or adapted the Arabic script into Ajami for their languages, and works were written in Akan, Fula, Yoruba, Hausa, and Swahili. Some were chronicles which literarily recorded oral tradition, such as the Kilwa Chronicle (16th c.), Timbuktu Chronicles (17th c.), Kitab Gonja (18th c.), Funj Chronicle (early 19th c.), and Kano Chronicle (). and portrayed an exotic image of Africa, primitive and often at war with itself. Most 16th-century records were written in Portuguese, which the Portuguese strictly censored so as to protect their monopoly on African business from trading rivals, and most were destroyed in the 1755 Lisbon earthquake. however imperial/colonial history later entered into the fringe of the profession. The liberal tradition, championed by figures such as William Miller Macmillan, sought to criticise colonialism and racial segregation. The 1940s and '50s saw the study of African history split from colonial history, as institutions were set up such as the School of Oriental and African Studies by the University of London, producing a new generation of Africanists. There were various proto-nationalist historians who fiercely combatted notions of European superiority, such as A. B. Horton, E. W. Blyden, J. W. Sarbah, J. E. Casely-Hayford, and J. B. Danquah, however their works resembled propaganda and today hold less authority than some of those already mentioned. The struggles for independence in the 1950s and '60s were mirrored by a movement towards decolonising African history. The new African elite now had the daunting task of achieving in the historical field what they had done in the political one. At the time, many did not think African history was possible and it was common for enthusiasm to be dismissed. The period saw a methodological revolution regarding the unprecedented widespread use of oral sources, alongside auxiliary disciplines. Other influential schools on the continent included the Legon School in Ghana which published on Akan history, and the Senegambian Dakar School where Cheikh Anta Diop instigated an "intellectual revolution" against French Egyptologists by linking Ancient Egypt to "Black Africa". The Dar es Salaam School in Tanzania led by Terence Ranger aimed to show modern nation states as continuations of the African past, and Bethwell Allan Ogot pioneered writing about stateless societies. Africanists such as Basil Davidson, Roland Oliver, and Catherine Coquery-Vidrovitch also made important contributions. National Historical Associations were founded along with journals such as Journal of the Historical Society of Nigeria, Afrika Zamani, and Kenya Historical Review, accompanying the European journals Journal of African History, ''Cahiers d'Études Africaines, and later History in Africa''. Works through the 1960s and '70s relied upon a wealth of data to conclusively prove that Africans possessed historical consciousnesses and conceptualised, preserved, and transmitted their history through oral tradition. Meanwhile, North African scholars and intellectuals found themselves in an identity crisis, and gravitated towards the Arab/Islamic world. The General History of Africa and The Cambridge History of Africas coverage of Ancient Egypt ensured it was viewed in an African context. He also attacked modernisation theory, arguing that Africa must reject the international capitalist system in order to develop. This new school which combined Marxist historiography with dependency theory broadened the discipline's domain from nationalist historiography's narrow focus. There has been an increased focus on ethnicity at the expense of social class. An important question to answer is what to do about the Western-derived nation states and institutions. In Decolonizing African History (2024), Toyin Falola writes that Eurocentric education systems, and all Eurocentric institutions for that matter, initially introduced by colonial regimes as foci of cultural and ideological imperialism, must be Africanised, done in part by the incorporation and application of African epistemologies. He emphasises the role played by academia and supranational organisations in achieving this. He says that thought processes and patterns must be derived from African experiences and realities, and research carried out based on the needs and values of respective societies. He argues that oral traditions and early indigenous works should be heavily prioritised in the re-narration of African history. He says that this decolonisation would uncover African solutions to African problems and recover an African identity people can be proud of. == Periodisation ==
Periodisation
Periodisation of African history was rooted in Eurocentrism, and initially centred around Africa's interactions with outsiders rather than on its internal developments. There is no agreed upon periodisation for African history, with the difference in temporal stages of state formation between parts of the continent generating disagreement. Prehistory's traditional meaning of covering time up to the first written record (based on the old view that history cannot exist without written sources) has been deprecated, and historians now consider history to be based on evidence. Basil Davidson considered Africa's ancient period to be until 1000 CE, Roland Oliver and Anthony Atmore proposed "Medieval Africa" as from 1250 to 1800 (having revised the start date back from 1400), and chose 1800 as the start date for "Modern Africa". Despite this, the Eurocentric terms "ancient", "medieval", and "modern" have long been criticised as failing to represent African realities and capture its complexity. == Oral tradition ==
Oral tradition
Oral tradition is a form of human communication in which knowledge, art, ideas and culture are received, preserved, and transmitted orally from one generation to another. Most African societies used oral tradition to record their history. They generally have a reverence for the oral word, and have been termed oral civilisations, contrasted with literate civilisations which pride the written word. Oral traditions differ from written texts in that they are more roundly subject to the sensory experience of the listener(s). Historians collect and transcribe oral traditions via fieldwork, a practice that was initially foreign to historians who would usually spend most of their time sifting through archives and libraries. Vansina stressed the importance of publishing all recorded versions, fieldnotes, and information on the recording situation, however noted few do so. Debates There have been various academic debates surrounding oral tradition. The first in the 1960s involved Jan Vansina and his students developing a rigorous approach to recover the past from oral traditions, counteracting scepticism and outright dismissal of the concept of African history. This was successful, despite not engaging and cooperating with African-American movements around oral history. The second focussed on the argument that oral traditions consisted of faithful memories of past events, which faced criticism from functionalists who argued that oral traditions function to reinforce present-day realities and give relatively little information about the past (called the "presentist critique"), and structuralists who emphasised the mythological and symbolic elements of oral tradition (called the "cosmological critique"). The cosmological critique was answered by Joseph Miller's The African Past Speaks (1980), in which historians emphasised the need to pay attention to how cultural understanding, political struggle, and memory shape traditions, and explore and analyse discrepancies between traditions which tend to signal problems, shifts, struggles, and loud silences. On the other hand, the presentist critique has proved pertinent and has been harder to dismiss. A folklorist critique of Africanist historians emphasised the role of the individual traditional oral historian in the crafting and preservation of oral traditions (and the possibility of infusion of autobiographical or experiential information, necessitating inquiry about the storyteller's life), rather than Africanists' focus on the influence of institutions, and the importance of an emic (insider) approach, rather than an etic (outsider) approach where the traditions are transcribed and interpreted from an outsider/European perspective. == Auxiliary sciences ==
Auxiliary sciences
Due to the lack of written sources, African historiography has often consulted and incorporated evidence from various disciplines, including archaeology, linguistics, anthropology, geography, political science, economics, psychology, and literary studies. Historians of Africa aim to acquire basic understandings of these disciplines in order to use evidence from them effectively and critically. Archaeology is the study of past peoples and cultures through the recovery and analysis of material culture and the interpretation of it. Materials uncovered include human remains, tools, weapons, pots, structures, and religious or artistic objects, with interpretation of them seeking to reconstruct what often is a lost culture or civilisation. African archaeology has contributed the most to African history out of the auxiliary disciplines. Archaeology covers all time periods apart from contemporary times, In cases where oral or written records are available, archaeology has helped to fill in the gaps. Historical linguistics provides evidence for cultural contacts, their physical environments, and contents of those cultures through the analysis of diffused features and reconstructed old vocabularies. It became a colonial science involving colonisers studying their subjects in order to gain a better understanding for greater control. Anthropology has helped historians better understand social and political relationships, historical events, and peoples' cultures. It can be crucial to understanding early political and economic structures, their evolution, the impact of colonialism, and their modern-day form. Understanding of political, economic, and kinship organisation can contribute to refuting narratives influenced by the Hamitic hypothesis. It is best known for informing the theory of biological human races; while this has since been rendered obsolete, the issue of dividing humans into units of analysis remains contentious, with scholars favouring ethnicities or communities. Physical anthropology can provide evidence about health and disease, ways of life, diet, microevolution, and genetic relationships. Geography Geography is the study of the lands, features, inhabitants, and phenomena of Earth. It is split into human geography and physical geography, the latter of which has contributed the most to African history. It informs understanding of how a people's environment has influenced them and their social evolution, and environmental factors have been very consequential in shaping the continent's history. For instance, grasslands and woodlands in particular favoured population expansion. Most histories include a preliminary chapter on the "land and people", and include maps which aid understanding and give a real-world impression. == Nationalist historiography ==
Nationalist historiography
Nationalist historiography infuses historical writing with nationalism. Historical memory shapes nationalist sentiment on the basis of a shared past, creating a cultural identity, which in turn produces and legitimises nations. African nationalist historiography's primary mission is to generate patriotism and sustain the nation states. Crucially it aimed to reverse dehumanising colonial thought, especially the notion that Africans had to be divided into tribes and separated in order to be governed, instead promoting unity. Inter-group relations were prioritised, while ethnic rivalries were marginalised. It sought to uncover Africa's contributions to the world, emphasising leadership qualities and institutions in precolonial states, and their integrity and historicity prior to colonisation. It pioneered the use of oral sources, seeking their legitimisation, however largely used archives. In attempting to reverse the colonialist notion that colonisation was the most important phase of African history, which implied a "barbaric past" and "modernising present", nationalist histories often downplayed its impacts. The onset of the "era of disillusionment", as economic development struggled in combination with various internal conflicts, brought tough challenges to nationalist historiography and saw it decline amid growing pessimism and nihilism. Some historians accepted responsibility for the model of the nation that they projected, which supported nationalist regimes and idealised leaders and power rather than production and commoners. Globally, nationalist historiography became unpopular within academic circles during the 20th century, with transnational histories more recently gaining in popularity. The new generation of African historians are less ideological, however the nationalist paradigm is still in use by some who confront neo-colonialist historians, and nationalist voices are included in the discipline's pluralist tradition. == Liberal historiography ==
Liberal historiography
Liberal historiography aimed to help Africans reclaim their history and write history from an African point of view. The liberal tradition was pioneered by William Miller Macmillan throughout the 1920s, seeking to criticise racial segregation policies and include Africans as makers of history, contrary to the dominant white supremacist historical traditions of the time. He also advocated for social history of people's daily lives and concerns. Liberal historiography has been especially influential in South African historiography, with liberal historians often sparring with Marxist/radical historians. They developed the practice of oral history, often asking questions to do with social change. == Marxist historiography ==
Marxist historiography
Marxist historiography is the study and interpretation of history through the lens of Marxist theory, and involves analysing historical events in relation to social classes and materialistic phenomena. It maintains that history is shaped by the constant struggle of people against their material and social contexts. Marxist thought (or "radicalism") has been highly influential in African historiography. Marxist scholars largely focussed on colonial history, and emphasised the agency of Africans. Among African scholars, the ideas of Michel Foucault and Antonio Gramsci regarding the ideology of power, particularly the manipulation of cultural norms in the maintenance of power hegemony, were particularly influential. Marxist historiography greatly affected narrative writing and advanced a "cause and effect" interpretation of events, in contrast to them being viewed as a series of accidents or related to divine will. Differing from nationalist histories, radical histories shifted the weight of anti-colonial struggle from the elites to commoners. While the school's generalisations led to the recognition of widespread patterns and the reinterpretation of events (such as the Fula jihads and Yoruba Revolutionary Wars), they sometimes inhibited the study of specific historical situations and often ignored cultural context. Despite this, Marxist approaches have been crucial in the development of a critical and holistic study of colonialism and Africa's relationship with the West. According to several scholars, they also solidified the point that European conquest and exploitation was the main cause of Africa's underdevelopment. The Marxist paradigm illuminated mass nationalism and militant resistance to colonialism, but also subscribed to a universal history of global capitalism. It has struggled to incorporate African thought, and narratives often found themselves at odds with the experiences and perspectives of the public. == Postcolonialism and postmodernism ==
Postcolonialism and postmodernism
Post-colonialist historiography studies the relationship between European colonial domination in Africa and the construction of African history, and has its roots in Edward Said's concept of Orientalism. Western imperialism is viewed as the product of insatiable desire for power over the non-Western world, with this ambition to dominate extending to subjecting cultures to scientific scrutiny. As a result, knowledge produced from this endeavour is invalid as a projection of Western stereotypes and formulations. Another point made is the relativity of true knowledge and its cultural embeddings, discouraging external critique. While Orientalism's characterisation of Western imperialism has come under criticism, themes of relativism have continued in postmodernism. Critics argue that this particular movement towards an African alternative results in the disintegration of "African" into a vast multitude of cultural identities, having ramifications for pan-Africanism. Historians are challenged with focussing on cultural context while countering the criticism that subscribing to the European-derived idea of "Africa" might render the whole enterprise of African history worthless to the continent's future. == Social history ==
Social history
Social history, sometimes called "history from below", is a field which aims to look at the lived experiences of the past, and uses a sociological (and occasionally ethnographic) approach to analyse and interpret historical events. Sources used include archival records, oral traditions, and oral testimonies. African social history more broadly has generally been neglected and left to social scientists, with historians usually focussing on small and familiar localities. Oral tradition gives valuable insights to African perspectives and mentalities, which is crucial to social history. Historiography of the Atlantic slave trade is by far the most developed sub-field on African migrations, however that of trans-Saharan and Indian Ocean migrations are growing. Women's history Women's history studies the role women have played in history, with a focus on women of historical significance and on how historical events affected women. It posits that women have been marginalised in the historical record, and aims to counter this. The three main paradigms in African historiography (nationalist, Marxist, and dependency theory) have neglected women's history, and works on general, economic, and even social history have had very little to say about women. Historians used to consider African women naturally inferior and helpless victims. African women's history grew rapidly from the 1970s, and has largely focussed on the colonial and postcolonial periods. There have been three waves, where the first focussed on economic production and agency, the second on the colonial period, and the third on gender, identity, and social struggle. Urban history Urban history studies the history of cities and towns, and examines the process of urbanisation. Scholars generally define African urban history as the study "of cities in Africa" rather than "of African cities", making them comparable to cities elsewhere with their Africanity considered secondary. Colonisers used to claim that Africa was mostly rural and historically absent of cities. Urban studies is typically very Eurocentric, and Africa has largely been neglected thus far, especially south of the Sahara. Scholars located in Africa are at a disadvantage, and often lack institutional access to the latest publications which tend to be expensive. Periodisation is demarcated into "precolonial", "colonial", and "postcolonial", due to colonisation gravely impacting the urbanisation process. Studies of colonial and postcolonial urban history tend to focus on dysfunctions, segregation, and marginalisation. Colonial cities mimicked those of industrial Europe by introducing capitalist systems of rent and administrative regimes, termed "modern", while pre-existing urban processes and structures, ranging from cosmology and family structure to construction materials, were termed "traditional", however postmodernist thought has largely dismantled this dichotomy. Local terms for settlements in general provide insight into how to approach the study of precolonial history. The widespread phenomenon of historical city-states in Africa requires a different approach to local politics, and favours comparability. Art history Art history is the historical study of the visual arts, and involves "identifying, classifying, describing, evaluating, interpreting, and understanding art products", as well as the study of the historical development of related fields, such as painting, sculpturing, architecture, and photography. From the late-19th century African art products started to appear in European museums, and curators developed systems for cataloguing and labelling them. It was only after the looting of the Benin Bronzes in the 1897 British expedition to Benin that Europeans realised there was art in Africa. The Bronzes appealed to their naturalistic tastes and the first scholarly work on African art history was Felix von Luschan's Benin Antiquities (1919). From 1905, German and French avant-garde artists recognised African art, and a wave of "delirious enthusiasm" ensued, caring only about form and not social context or meaning. Anthropologists entered the fray from 1925, and a specialised field had developed by 1945, followed by archaeologists' input from 1956. In Art history in Africa (1984), Jan Vansina called scholars' treatment of African art history "shallow", and Henry Drewal considered it to have been neglected by scholars of African art. As of 2005 the field had no periodisation, and by and large African art was not treated as historically dynamic, compounded by the application of anachronistic ethnic group terms. The concept of "diaspora" has been applied to art products taken out of their social context. == Economic history ==
Economic history
Economic history is the study of history using methodological tools from economics or with a special attention to economic phenomena. There are three main schools of thought in African economic history: neoclassical, Marxist, and one centred on dependency theory. The leading journal is African Economic History, founded in 1976. From the 1980s to early 2000s, Africa rarely appeared in major journals on economic history. Since then, there has been a revival in the study of African economic history, mostly focussed on contemporary history. The discipline lacks input from African scholars, most of which are employed in the West due to a lack of opportunities at home, reducing the diversity of views and sidelining local perspectives. Oluwatosin Adeniyi has lamented the lack of "African economics" as a distinct 'Africanised' discipline in the same vein as African art or African psychology. Periodisation is split into four periods: the first is from the earliest hominids, through the Stone and Iron ages, and covers the development of agriculture; the second begins in the 16th century and revolves around the Atlantic slave trade; the third begins in the 19th century with the abolition of the slave trade and covers the colonial period; and the fourth covers postcolonial history from the mid 20th century to the present. Modernisation theory, which held that underdeveloped "traditional" societies had to be transformed into "modern" ones, dominated the discipline through the 1950s and '60s. It rapidly fell out of favour due to economic crises in the West and historical research uncovering contradictory evidence, creating a vacuum to be filled by dependency theory where capitalism became seen as the problem rather than the solution. Approaches from the Annales school gained currency in African historiography in the 1980s, however now they have mostly been absorbed into other schools. Schools of thought The neoclassical approach emphasises trade and exchange systems in African economies, with early pioneers being Kenneth Dike and A. G. Hopkins. Its initial efforts were to disprove Eurocentric ideas that economic dynamism, markets, and trade did not play important roles in precolonial Africa. Rational choice theory is central to this approach. The neoclassical school has received criticism for focussing too heavily on exchange and neglecting production. The Marxist approach applies Marxist economic theory, specifically the theory of "modes of production". Leading scholars included Jean Suret-Canale and Catherine Coquery-Vidrovitch. The approach focusses on production, in contrast to dependency theory's emphasis on external trade. It considers multiple modes of production able to coexist within an economy and sought to identify indigenous modes of production, with the colonial period characterised by the domination of the colonial mode over precolonial or pre-capitalist modes. A. G. Hopkins says that its economic models "fitted awkwardly" if at all, and the class paradigm proved unfruitful. Dependency theorists emphasise unequal exchange as a causal factor of underdevelopment, and apply world-systems theory. They posit that Europe created a peripheral form of capitalism geared towards exporting capital rather than cumulative reinvestment, resulting in a rich centre which accumulates wealth to the detriment of a periphery. Governmental policies informed by this seek to reduce or cut off relations with the West. Leading scholars include Immanuel Wallerstein, Samir Amin, Giovanni Arrighi, and Charles E. Alpers. This approach has been criticised for denying Africans agency. New economic history applies econometrics to economic history, and utilises technology able to process large amounts of quantitative data. Prominent scholars include Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, and James Robinson. They advance a "reversal of fortunes" theory, positing that as a result of colonialism, richer regions in 1500 became poorer due to the fashioning of extractivist and exploitative institutions, while poorer and less populated areas grew richer due to settler colonialism. This approach has been criticised for not taking into account historical changes over long periods, and for compressing history by presenting century-old events as causal to the present. == Military history ==
Military history
Military history is the study of armed conflict and its impact on societies, cultures and economies, as well as the resulting changes to local and international relationships. Oral traditions rarely give insights into military history. African military history was neglected throughout the 20th century, in part due to colonial thought and wariness about embracing militarism amid various contemporary conflicts. Early on, it focussed on military resistance at the time of colonial conquest. In the 1990s social historians began to focus on the lives of soldiers and veterans, improving understanding of the colonial experience. It is only in the last decade that Africanists have begun incorporating this into a separate sub-discipline of military history. Michelle Moyd calls the representation of African conflicts as "mindless violence" or "irrational" racist stereotypes, while Charles Thomas and Roy Doron call this "the pernicious myth of anarchic violence". Moyd warns against grand narratives which reinforce these views, such as the trope that Shaka was responsible for the Mfecane. Most historians follow Richard Reid in studying "African dynamic[s] in the use of force and violence in the continent's deeper history", which provides insights into state formation, slavery, and conflict with foreign entities. One focus is to study how people became soldiers. The study of slave revolts in the African diaspora can offer insights. The evolution of colonial armies into national armies can be studied to better understand civil-military relations. The incorporation of social history also involves the study of Africans' experiences of violence and conflicts. Feminist military history contributes to this, and Dahomey offers a rare opportunity to study women warriors. Rather than embracing militarism, historians aim to contribute to containing violence by furthering understanding of its origins, manifestations, and institutional dynamics. == Environmental history ==
Environmental history
Environmental history focusses on the dynamic interaction between the environment (nature) and human societies (cultures), where environmental change is viewed as steps toward physical and mental domestication and conquest. "Declinist" views consider the impact of modernisation on the environment to be too costly and, without intervention, trending towards the death of nature and culture. "Inclinist" views emphasise small-scale development incorporating traditional knowledge and traditional resource management as the key to sustainability. Prior to the 20th century, nature was widely seen as the determiner of the vitality and culture of societies, now called environmental determinism, which was also a common view found in oral traditions. In the 1950s and '60s in Europe, environmental agency fell out of favour as the use of science was considered close to conquering nature, called cultural determinism. Modernisation theorists viewed scientific knowledge as a mechanism capable of conquering and replacing nature with artificial phenomena. Marxists considered capitalist market mechanisms destructive to moral economies and ecologies. The idea of a "wild Africa" has been soundly rejected. The nature-culture dichotomy has seen strong criticism with some favouring a hybrid view, however it remains popular in African environmental history. Human and culture history originated in Africa and it therefore has unparalleled depth, with the continent having been very hospitable, however this is thought to have changed as the environment became hostile; scholars consider Africa to have been the first victim of the Great Divergence and its culture to have slowed. Some possible causes include the end of the ice ages, the drying of the Sahara, or the Little Ice Age. The slave trade and its chaotic end, immediately followed by colonisation, the World Wars, and the recent population boom have likely contributed. Researchers often attribute famines and epidemics to low domestication of Africa's environment. However Emmanuel Kreike says that domestication is a poor marker for development due to its Eurocentric scientific-evolutionary definition. "Environmental infrastructure" is when the environment is shaped by cooperation between humans and non-humans such that it sustains the life of both, which Kreike says is more applicable to African history. Conservation studies emphasises the closure of communal resources for indigenous peoples and power struggle between colonial governments and their subjects. Postmodernism had a big impact on environmental history, as it encouraged critique of colonial perceptions and the incorporation of ethnohistory and traditional knowledge to inform conceptualisations. == Afrocentrism ==
Afrocentrism
Following the early ideological traditions of Pan-Africanism (popularised by Marcus Garvey and W. E. B. Du Bois) and Négritude (advocated by Aimé Césaire and Léopold Sédar Senghor), in the second half of the 20th century African Americans became closely involved and took greater interest in the study of Africa. They posited that the project of African history ought to be tied to the notion of racial liberation from white domination. Afrocentrist histories are rooted in old pan-Africanist visions of racial unity and cultural diffusion, and consider Ancient Egypt as having played a central role in African history. Another idea espoused by Asante, building off of the work of Cheikh Anta Diop, is that Africa should use Ancient Egypt as its foundational source of scholarly inspiration, similar to the role Ancient Greece and Rome plays in European scholarship. Afrocentrism is largely marginal to mainstream scholarship, and more closely resembles popular history. Its ideas and the discourse surrounding them have often attracted criticism and controversy. While most scholars recognise the need for African studies to be rooted in African thought, they have warned against usurping discredited notions of white supremacy with discourse of black supremacy. Afrocentrist histories remain popular in the African diaspora in the Americas amid an ongoing struggle for respect, equality, and empowerment in their respective societies, and are influential regarding the popular perception of Africa. They often ignore advances made in African historiography in the last half-century, and rely upon crude generalisations and clichés. Few African scholars have shown interest in the subject, indicating the irrelevance of racial discourse throughout much of the continent in the present day. ==See also==
tickerdossier.comtickerdossier.substack.com