There are a number of variations in this procedure between parliaments. In some countries, a motion of no confidence can be directed at the government collectively or at any individual member, including the
prime minister. Sometimes, motions of confidence or no confidence are proposed even though it is clear that the government does in fact have majority support simply to pressure ministers or put opposition parties in the potentially embarrassing situation of voting in support of the government. In many
parliamentary democracies, there are limits to how often a confidence vote may be held, such as being allowed only once every three or six months. Thus, the timing of a motion of no confidence is a matter of political judgment. A motion of no confidence on a relatively trivial matter may then prove counterproductive if an issue suddenly arises that is seen to be a more credible justification for a motion of no confidence. Sometimes, the government chooses to declare that one of its bills is a "vote of confidence" to prevent dissident members of its own party from voting against it. However, this is a political risk, especially when the Prime Minister's majority is not assured, such as if the ruling party/coalition is internally divided, or in
minority government; if the bill fails (and thus it is shown that parliament has lost its confidence in the government), the Prime Minister is expected to resign or call snap elections. In Westminster systems, the
government budget is always a vote of confidence; even a successful amendment to the budget may be considered a no-confidence vote. It is not necessarily the case that a vote with the effect of a motion of no confidence be introduced as such. As stated above, certain pieces of legislation may be treated as confidence issues. In some cases, the motion may be an ordinary legislative or procedural matter of little substantive importance used for the purpose of testing the government's majority, such as the
1895 vote of no confidence in the Earl of Rosebery's government, which was technically a motion to reduce the salary of a minister by a nominal sum.
Australia In the
Australian Parliament, a motion of no confidence requires a
majority of the members present in the
House of Representatives to agree to it. The House of Representatives has 150 members and so requires 76 votes in favour of the motion when all members of the House are present. A straight vote of no confidence in the
Australian government and a motion or amendment censuring a government have never been successful in the House of Representatives. However, the Senate's right to refuse supply helped spark the
1975 Australian constitutional crisis.
Bangladesh In the
Parliament of Bangladesh, there is no provision to hold motions of no confidence, as a result of
Article 70 of the Constitution of Bangladesh, which prohibits members of Parliament from voting against their party and made the removal of a sitting government unattainable.
Canada In
Canada, a vote of no confidence is a motion that the
House of Commons (federal) or
legislative assembly (provincial) no longer has confidence in the incumbent government. A no-confidence motion may be directed against only the incumbent government, with confidence motions against the
Official Opposition being inadmissible. Originating as a
constitutional convention, In the House of Commons, a member of parliament may introduce a motion that explicitly states the House has no confidence in the incumbent government. The government may also declare any bill or motion to be a question of confidence. If a vote of no confidence passes, the prime minister is required to either resign or request the
governor-general to dissolve parliament and call a
general election. This provision was repealed in June 1985. In 1984, a proposal was made to consider the election of
speaker to not be a matter of confidence. The confidence convention is also present in the provincial legislatures of Canada, operating much like their federal counterpart. However, the decision to dissolve the legislature and call an election or to see if another coalition/party can form a government is left to the provincial
lieutenant-governor. In a consensus government, confidence motions may be directed against any individual ministers holding office as they are also nominated by members of the legislature.
Czech Republic The
Constitution of the Czech Republic provides for a government responsible to the Chamber of Deputies (the lower chamber of the
Czech parliament). Any new government, appointed after the demise of previous one, must—no more than 30 days after being appointed by the
president of the republic—request a motion of confidence vote from the
Chamber of Deputies. If this government also fails to gain confidence, then the President of the republic must appoint a prime minister proposed by the
president of the Chamber of Deputies. If this government still fails to gain confidence of the Chamber, then the president of the republic may choose either to again appoint a prime minister of his choice (the government still need to pass motion of confidence) or to order the dissolution of the Chamber of Deputies and set new elections. The government can also connect voting on a government-sponsored bill with a request for a vote of confidence. If the bill fails to pass in Chamber of Deputies it is equivalent to a lost vote of confidence. In this case, the Chamber has to vote on the proposed bill within three months of its submission (otherwise the president of the republic can dissolve it). The Chamber of Deputies may itself start debate on a vote of no confidence in the government, but only if it has been submitted in writing by at least fifty Deputies. To adopt the resolution, an absolute majority of all Deputies have to vote against the government.
Denmark Paragraph 15 of the
Danish Constitution states that "A Minister shall not remain in office after the Folketing has passed a vote of no confidence in him" and that "When the Folketing passes a vote of no confidence in the Prime Minister, he shall ask for the dismissal of the Ministry unless writs are to be issued for a general election." The vote requires a
simple majority. Votes of no confidence against the government are rare in Denmark, only occurring in 1909,
1947 and 1975. Generally the government will resign or call for an election before a vote of no confidence.
Germany In
Germany, a vote of no confidence in the
federal chancellor requires the opposition, on the same ballot, to propose a candidate of its own whom it wants the
federal president to appoint as its successor. Thus, a motion of no confidence may be brought forward only if there is a positive majority for the new candidate. The idea was to prevent the state crises that occurred near the end of the German
Weimar Republic. Frequently, chancellors were then turned out of the office without their successors having enough parliamentary support to govern. Unlike the British system, chancellors do not have to resign in response to the failure of a vote of confidence if it has been initiated by them, rather than by the parliamentary opposition, but they may ask the president to call general elections, a request that the president decides on whether to fulfil.
Greece The Parliament may, by its decision, withdraw its confidence from the Government or from a member of it. A motion of no confidence can only be submitted six months after the Parliament has rejected a previous one. The motion must be signed by at least one-sixth of the members and must clearly state the issues to be debated. A motion of no confidence is accepted only if it is approved by the absolute majority of the total number of members.
India In India, a motion of no confidence can be introduced only in the
Lok Sabha (the
lower house of the
Parliament of India) and after at least 50
Lok Sabha members support it, the
Speaker may grant a leave and after considering the state of business in the House, allot a day or days or part OF a day for the discussion of the motion (under sub-rule (2) and (3) of rule 198 of Lok Sabha Rules, 16th edition). If the motion carries, the House debates and votes on the motion. If a majority of the members vote in favour of the motion, it is passed, and all the ministers are expected to resign on their moral grounds.
J. B. Kripalani moved the first-ever no-confidence motion on the floor of the Lok Sabha against the government of prime minister
Jawaharlal Nehru in August 1963, immediately after the disastrous
Sino-Indian War. As of August 2023, 31 no-confidence motions have been moved. Prime Minister
Indira Gandhi faced the most no-confidence motions (15), followed by
Lal Bahadur Shastri and
P. V. Narasimha Rao (three each),
Morarji Desai and
Narendra Modi (two each), and
Jawaharlal Nehru,
Rajiv Gandhi,
V. P. Singh,
H. D. Deve Gowda,
Atal Bihari Vajpayee, and
Manmohan Singh (one each).
Prime Minister Vajpayee lost the no-confidence motion by a margin of one vote (269–270) on 17 April 1999. Prime Minister Desai resigned on 12 July 1979 after being defeated in a vote of no-confidence, V. P. Singh and H. D. Deve Gowda were also removed in no-confidence motion. The two most recent no-confidence motions were brought against the
Narendra Modi government, in 2018 and in 2023(due to the
ethnic violence in the state of
Manipur), both of which were failed in the
Lok Sabha. Even after the
Anti-Defection Law, when the majority party has an absolute majority and it can
whip party members to vote in favour of the government; still it is possible to remove the government by a no-confidence motion if the ruling party breaks by more than one third.
Ireland In
Ireland, if a motion of no confidence in the
Taoiseach or the
government of Ireland is passed by
Dáil Éireann, then the Taoiseach may request that the
President dissolve the Dáil and call a
general election. Whether or not to grant this request is at the discretion of the President, though no President has ever refused a request for dissolution. Should the President refuse to dissolve the Dáil, the Taoiseach and government must resign. Despite often tabling motions of no confidence in the
Knesset, opposition parties have only ever toppled a sitting government once, that being when
Labor Party leader
Shimon Peres attempted to form a government of left-wing factions and
ultra-orthodox parties, in a scandal known as
the dirty trick, to replace the
national unity government of
Likud's Yitzhak Shamir. However, despite securing the non-confidence motion, Shamir managed to stay on as prime minister for the remainder of the 12th Knesset. the government requires the support of both houses of
Parliament. Within ten days of the government's formation, a confidence motion must be passed. Five governments were forced to resign when a motion of confidence in them failed to pass in one of the houses of Parliament: the
eighth De Gasperi cabinet in 1953, the
first Fanfani cabinet in 1954, the
first Andreotti cabinet in 1972, the
fifth Andreotti cabinet in 1979 and the
seventh Fanfani cabinet in 1987. Parliament can withdraw its support to the government through a vote of no confidence. A vote of no confidence may be proposed if a tenth of the members of either house sign the proposition and within three days before the appointed date, the vote can be brought into the discussion. Since the drafting of the
Constitution of Italy, Parliament has not passed any no confidence motion against the whole cabinet, as government crises often ended with prime ministers resigning after becoming aware the majority of parliament did not support them anymore, before a no confidence motion could be put to vote or even before such a motion was presented. The only time this instrument was used was in October 1995, when the minister of justice
Filippo Mancuso was forced to resign after a vote of no confidence against him passed in the
Senate. The subsequent
Constitutional Court sentence in 1996 declared it was indeed possible to propose an individual vote of no confidence against a single
minister, instead of the whole government, and that as such, the motion Mancuso was legitimate. The government can also make any vote a matter of confidence. In the entire history of the Republic of Italy, only two governments were forced to resign when a vote they had made a matter of confidence failed: the
first Prodi cabinet in 1996, and the
second Prodi cabinet in 2006. In both cases, the vote made a matter of confidence was a vote on a resolution approving the prime minister's address to one of the houses of Parliament.
Japan Article 69 of the 1947
Constitution of Japan provides that "if the
House of Representatives passes a non-confidence resolution, or rejects a confidence resolution, the
Cabinet shall resign en masse, unless the House of Representatives is dissolved within ten (10) days." Since the Japanese political system has been dominated by the right-wing
Liberal Democratic Party for all but 6 years since 1955, either in majority governments or coalitions with
Komeito, non-confidence votes in the government have been rare. Yet, two governments, those of Prime Ministers
Masayoshi Ōhira and
Kiichi Miyazawa were brought down after significant portions of their own party turned against them.
Malaysia In Malaysia's
federal political system, votes of confidence in
state legislative assemblies of Malaysia have removed its
heads of state governments four times, the most recent being
Faizal Azumu's Perak ministry in 2020. During the
2020–2022 Malaysian political crisis, opposition members of Parliament demanded a vote of confidence in Prime Minister
Muhyiddin Yassin, but he resigned before this could take place. After the
2022 Malaysian general election, in order to quell the scepticism on
Anwar Ibrahim's legitimacy as prime minister, Anwar's government tabled a motion of confidence in the
Dewan Rakyat on 19 December 2022, which was passed by a
voice vote on the same day, thereby solidifying his position as prime minister.
Pakistan The
Constitution of Pakistan has provision for a no-confidence motion in all constituents of the
Electoral College of the state. The motions can target speakers and deputy speakers of
provincial and
national assemblies, the
prime minister,
chief ministers of
provinces, as well as the chairman and deputy chairman of
Senate. Before it can be put for a vote on the pertinent house's floor, it must have the backing of at least 20% of the elected members in all cases except those moved against speakers or deputy speakers in which case there is no minimum. After being put to vote, the motion is deemed to be successful only if passed by a majority. The no-confidence procedure has historically been mostly used to remove speakers and deputy speakers. Of the 11 times that the motion has been invoked, nine cases targeted those posts, with four being effective. Votes of no confidence in prime ministers are extremely rare. In November 1989,
Benazir Bhutto faced an ultimately unsuccessful motion of no confidence by
Ghulam Mustafa Jatoi. Same is the case for provincial
chief ministers, as the only instance of its use is the one moved in January 2018 against
Sanaullah Zehri, the chief minister of
Balochistan, who resigned before the vote could take place. Since gaining independence in 1947, only
Imran Khan was successfully removed as prime minister through a
motion of no confidence in 2022. An earlier attempt led by the opposition was dismissed by the deputy speaker
Qasim Suri using Article 5 of the constitution. Later on, President
Arif Alvi dissolved the National Assembly immediately after receiving advice from Prime Minister Khan to do so, causing a
constitutional crisis. On 7 April 2022, the
Supreme Court of Pakistan ruled that the dismissal of the no-confidence motion, the prorogation of the National Assembly, advice of Khan to president Arif Alvi to dissolve the National Assembly and subsequent dissolution of the National Assembly were unconstitutional, and overturned these actions. On 10 April 2022, the reconvened National Assembly passed the motion of no confidence against Khan by a majority vote of 172, being the first successful ousting through no–confidence motion.
Peru In Peru, both the legislative and the executive branches have the power to bring a motion of no confidence against acting legal members of the other branch. The president of the Cabinet may propose a motion of no confidence against any minister to Congress, which then needs more than half the Congress to approve it. The
president of the republic may dissolve
Congress if it has censured or denied its confidence to two Cabinets. The relevant Articles 132–134 are in the 1993 version of the
Constitution of Peru. During the
2019 Peruvian constitutional crisis, President
Martín Vizcarra enacted a constitutional process on 29 May 2019 to create a motion of no confidence towards Congress if it refused to co-operate with his proposed actions against corruption.
Pedro Castillo also motioned to use this mechanism against Congress in 2022 when
he attempted to dissolve the legislative body. The Congressionally-appointed
Constitutional Court of Peru, during the presidency of Castillo, would rule that only Congress could interpret whether or not a motion of confidence has been made.
Poland The
Constitution of Poland (1997) provides for government responsible to the Sejm (lower chamber of the
Parliament of Poland). The
President of the Republic has no more than 14 days after the dismissal of the old government or after the first sitting of the newly elected
Sejm, to appoint a prime minister and on his recommendation other members of the government (prime minister has to submit resignation of the current sitting government at first sitting of the newly elected Sejm). 14 days after being appointed by the president, the government has to present their programme to the Sejm and ask for a motion requiring a vote of confidence. Motion is passed if more present Sejm deputies vote for the new government than against it. At least half of all Deputies have to be present. If the government fails to pass the vote of confidence (or if the president failed to appoint a new government in time) then the President of Sejm nominates a prime minister and government which has to also pass the vote of confidence. If the vote of confidence was successful, the president of the republic has to formally appoint this government. Otherwise the president may nominate members of the government as in the first instance. If even this time government fails to pass the vote of confidence, then the President of the Republic has to call a new parliamentary election. Prime minister can ask the Sejm for a vote of confidence. Government as whole but also individual ministers (for their ministry) are responsible to the Sejm. The Sejm may also pass a vote of no confidence in an individual minister. This motion can be called if at least 69 Deputies requested it. Same voting procedure as for vote of no confidence of whole government apply. The President of the Republic has to recall a minister who failed to pass vote of no confidence.
Scotland In the
Scottish Parliament, a confidence motion requires the support of at least 25 MSPs in order to be voted on. Under the
Scotland Act 1998, the passage of a successful confidence motion in the Scottish Government compels the resignation of all ministers. The Parliament then has 28 days to nominate a new
First Minister before a general election would be called. Motions can be lodged against individual ministers, the First Minister, or the government as a whole. There have been nine confidence motions voted on since the establishment of the Parliament in 1999, and none have been successful so far.
South Africa Any member of Parliament in the
National Assembly may request a motion of no confidence in either the Cabinet, excluding the
president, or the president. The Speaker, within the rules of
Parliament, must add such a motion to the order paper and give it a priority. If a motion of no confidence cannot be scheduled by the last sitting day of the annual sitting, it must be the first item on the order paper of the next sitting. In the event of a successful motion, the Speaker automatically assumes the position of acting president. On 7 August 2017, Speaker
Baleka Mbete announced that she would permit a motion of no confidence in
Jacob Zuma's government to proceed in the National Assembly via
secret ballot. It was the eighth motion to be brought against Zuma in his presidency and the first to be held via secret ballot. After the vote was held the next day, the motion was defeated 198–177, with 25 abstentions. Around 20 governing
ANC members of Parliament voted in favour of the measure.
Spain (right) congratulates the incoming prime minister
Pedro Sánchez (left) upon losing the no-confidence vote on 1 June 2018. The
Spanish Constitution of 1978 provides for motions of no confidence to be proposed by one-tenth of the
Congress of Deputies. Following the German model, votes of no confidence in Spain are
constructive and so the motion must also include an alternative candidate for
prime minister. For a motion of no confidence to be successful, it has to be carried by an absolute majority in the Congress of Deputies. At least five days must pass after the motion is registered before it can come up for a vote. Other parties may submit alternative motions within two days of the registration. Also, the prime minister is barred from dissolving the
Cortes Generales and calling a general election while a motion of no confidence is pending. If the motion is successful, the incumbent prime minister must resign. According to the Constitution, the replacement candidate named in the motion is automatically deemed to have the confidence of the Congress of Deputies and is immediately appointed as prime minister by the
monarch. If the motion is unsuccessful, its signatories may not submit another motion during the same session.
Singapore Under Article 25(1) of the
Constitution of Singapore, the
prime minister of Singapore must command the confidence of
Parliament less
NCMPs and
NMPs. Since
Singapore's independence on 9 August 1965, no Singaporean government has ever faced a motion of no confidence. However, Prime Minister
Lee Kuan Yew faced three no-confidence motions in 1961, 1962 and 1963, all prior to independence. The 1960s saw the ruling
PAP split between the right wing led by Lee Kuan Yew and the left wing led by
Lim Chin Siong. This caused PAP's massive majority to diminish. Lee Kuan Yew faced his first confidence vote on 20 July 1961 following the PAP's defeat in the
Hong Lim and Anson by-elections. This motion was rather a motion of confidence tabled by the Prime Minister himself. All 51
assemblymen were present and voting. The Prime Minister won the vote by a margin of 27–8 votes. The results were as follows: However, among the 16 abstentions were 13 left wing PAP members, who were expelled from the PAP after the vote, and the 13 went on to form the
Barisan Sosialis. On 13 July 1962, Barisan MP
Lee Siew Choh tabled a motion of no confidence against Lee Kuan Yew. Three assemblymen were absent bringing the total membership of the
Legislative Assembly to 48 present and voting. The Prime Minister won the vote by 24–16. Therefore, Lee Kuan Yew remained in office. The results for this motion of no confidence are as follows: Lee Siew Choh tabled another motion of no confidence against Lee Kuan Yew's government on 15 June 1963 over issues regarding the proposed merger of Singapore into the Federation of Malaysia. Five members were absent from the Assembly and 1 seat was vacant bringing the total membership down to 45 present and voting. This time, Lee Kuan Yew's Government won the vote by a margin of 23–16. The results are as follows: In September 1963, the Legislative Assembly was dissolved and
fresh elections were called. The rump PAP won the election with a two-thirds majority therefore staving off any attempts by the Barisan Sosialis to move further motions of no confidence. Following merger and separation (1963–1965), and with Barisan's boycott of Parliament, the PAP was the dominant party in Parliament and motions of no confidence became "rare", in fact "non-existent". Further, Lee Kuan Yew's 1961 motion of confidence remains the only time that a Singaporean prime minister has ever tabled a motion of confidence in his own government.
Sweden A motion of no confidence may be levelled against either the
prime minister on behalf of the entire
Swedish government or against an individual lower-level minister. At least 35 members of parliament (MPs) must support a proposal to initiate such a vote. A majority of MPs (175 members) must vote for a motion of no confidence for it to be successful. An individual minister who loses a confidence vote must resign. If a prime minister loses a no-confidence vote, the entire government must resign. The speaker may allow the ousted prime minister to head a transitional or caretaker government until Parliament elects a new prime minister. Under the principle of negative parliamentarism, a prime ministerial candidate nominated by the Speaker does not need the confidence of a majority of MPs to be elected. However, a majority of MPs must not vote against the candidate, which renders prime ministerial votes similar to no-confidence votes. That means that a prime ministerial candidate, to be successful in the parliamentary vote, must have at least a total of 175 votes in favour or abstention. If a Speaker fails four times to have a nominee elected, an election must be held within three months of the final vote.
Turkey Between 1923 and 2017, the
Grand National Assembly of Turkey held the right to remove the
prime minister and
the cabinet through a motion of no confidence. As a result of the
2017 Turkish constitutional referendum, the system of government was changed from parliamentary to presidential, and the articles containing the office of prime ministry and the procedure were removed from
the constitution.
United Kingdom Traditionally, in the
Westminster system, the defeat of a
supply bill, which concerns the spending of money, is seen to require automatically for the government to resign or ask for a new election, much like a no-confidence vote. A government in a Westminster system that cannot spend money is hamstrung, which is also called a
loss of supply. One of the most famous motions of no-confidence in British history was against
James Callaghan who
lost a motion of no-confidence by just one vote (311–310). There are other, failed motions of no confidence such as that of
Theresa May which was defeated by a narrow margin of 325–306, and that of
Boris Johnson which was defeated by a greater margin (347–238). In the
British Parliament, a no-confidence motion generally first appeared as an
early day motion although the vote on the
Speech from the Throne was also a confidence motion. However, from 2011 to 2022, under the then-
Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011, only a motion explicitly resolving that "this House has no confidence in His Majesty's Government" was treated as a motion of no confidence. In 2022 the
Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 was repealed by the
Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Act 2022. ==Semi-presidential systems==