meets with
Lavrov (pictured) and
Kislyak on May 10, 2017. A photographer from
Russian News Agency TASS was present, but no other press. President
Donald Trump discussed
classified information during an
Oval Office meeting on May 10, 2017, with the Russian Foreign Minister
Sergey Lavrov and the Russian Ambassador
Sergey Kislyak. The information was provided by a U.S. ally and concerned a planned
Islamic State (ISIL) operation, providing sufficient detail that the Russians could use to deduce the identity of the ally and the manner in which it was collected, according to current and former government officials. The meeting had been closed to the U.S. press, although a photographer from the Russian press contingent was present.
Origin of intelligence The May 15
The Washington Post article The intelligence was so sensitive that it hadn't even been shared among key U.S. allies. It was later reported that
Israel was the source of the information. Israel did not confirm or deny the report but released a statement stating full confidence in the
intelligence sharing relationships with the United States.
Ynetnews, an Israeli news website, had previously reported on January 12 that in a meeting held in early January (during
Trump's presidential transition), U.S. intelligence officials advised Israeli
Mossad and other intelligence officials to "be careful" when transferring intelligence information to the Trump White House and administration until the possibility of Russian influence over Trump, suggested by
Christopher Steele's report (commonly referred as the
Steele dossier), has been fully investigated. U.S. officials were concerned that the information, particularly about sensitive intelligence sources, could be passed to Russia and then to
Iran. The report was described as "shocking" and "horrifying" by some commentators and former U.S. intelligence officials. According to current and former U.S. officials interviewed by ABC News, Trump's disclosure endangered the life of a spy placed by Israel in ISIL-held territory in Syria. The classified information Trump shared came from a source described as the most valuable of any current sources on any current external plotting, according to
The Wall Street Journal.
Reporting On May 15, 2017,
The Washington Post, citing anonymous sources, reported that the intelligence was about an
ISIL plot to stealthily use laptops as weapons that can then explode in Western countries, and that a Middle Eastern ally provided the intelligence, which was
codeword-classified, meaning that its distribution was restricted only to those who were explicitly
cleared to read it, and was not intended to be shared beyond the United States and certain allies. and
Reuters. and raised questions on Trump's respect for the
Five Eyes intelligence-sharing agreement. Several commentators stated that by releasing classified information to Russia, Trump jeopardized American and allied intelligence sources, breached the trust relationship with America's foreign partners, threatened the long-term national security of the country, and violated his oath of office through "
gross negligence". All of these actions are possible legal grounds towards
efforts to impeach Donald Trump. Aides privately defended the President, stating that Trump did not have sufficient interest or knowledge of the intelligence gathering process to leak specific sources or methods of intelligence gathering;
National Security Advisor H. R. McMaster publicly maintained that Trump had not been briefed on the origins of the intelligence in question and therefore could not have compromised the source. According to conservative commentator
Erick Erickson, multiple sources have stated that Trump's actions were far worse than what had been reported, and that one of the
Posts sources was a strong supporter of Trump who believed it was necessary to publicly disclose the story because of Trump's inability to accept criticism.
White House response White House staff initially denied the veracity of the report during the evening of May 15. In a press briefing on the same day, McMaster denied
The Washington Post report, saying, "At no time, at no time, were intelligence sources or methods discussed. And the president did not disclose any military operations that were not already publicly known. Two other senior officials who were present, including the secretary of state, remember the meeting the same way and have said so. And their on-the-record accounts should outweigh those of anonymous sources." He concluded by saying, "I was in the room, it didn't happen." McMaster said that "it was wholly appropriate to share" the information because of a similar ISIL plot two years earlier. Deputy National Security Advisor for Strategy
Dina Habib Powell flatly rejected the
Post article, saying: "This story is false. The president only discussed the common threats that both countries faced."
Israeli response Israeli intelligence officials were reportedly horrified by the disclosure. In public comments, Israeli officials including intelligence minister
Yisrael Katz, Ambassador to the United States
Ron Dermer, and Defense Minister
Avigdor Lieberman said the intelligence services of the two countries would continue to share information, with Dermer saying "Israel has full confidence in our intelligence-sharing relationship with the United States." However, speaking privately, unnamed Israeli sources said they might need to reassess what intelligence they share with the U.S. Israeli officials stated that it is Israel's "worst fears confirmed" about Donald Trump. The officials also stated that
Israeli intelligence officers were "boiling mad and demanding answers" on its current
intelligence-sharing agreement with the US. On May 22, while visiting Israel, Trump appeared to confirm both the disclosure and the identity of Israel as the source, telling the press: "Folks, folks, just so you understand, just so you understand, I never mentioned the word or the name Israel during that conversation." It had been widely reported before May 22 that Israel was the source. On May 16, Trump implicitly confirmed a disclosure in a tweet, claiming that:As President, I wanted to share with Russia (at an openly scheduled W.H. meeting) which I have the absolute right to do, facts pertaining ... to terrorism and airline flight safety. Humanitarian reasons, plus I want Russia to greatly step up their fight against ISIS & terrorism.
Reactions U.S. Congress Speaker of the House Republican
Paul Ryan said through a spokesman that he "hopes for a full explanation of the facts from the administration".
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said: "The president owes the intelligence community, the American people and Congress a full explanation."
Foreign countries Reaction from foreign countries was generally negative. A top European intelligence official said that sharing of intelligence with the United States would cease if the country confirms that Trump did indeed share classified information with Russia, because sharing intel with Americans while Trump is president could put their sources at risk.
Burkhard Lischka, a member of the German
Bundestag's intelligence oversight committee, said that if Trump "passes this information to other governments at will, then Trump becomes a security risk for the entire western world".
Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman
Maria Zakharova denied the U.S. media reports.
Academics Several professors of law, political science, and international relations, as well as intelligence experts, were alarmed by Trump's disclosure. Intelligence expert
Amy Zegart of Stanford University noted that Trump revealed code word intelligence, which is the highest layer of classification, even higher than the "top secret" classification. Such information, if revealed, could reasonably be expected to cause "exceptionally grave damage" to the national security of the United States. She wrote, "so just how bad is the damage? On a scale of 1 to 10—and I'm just ball parking here—it's about a billion." The effects could be "disastrous". another legal scholar, Professor
Stephen Vladeck, wrote that the president's "constitutional power over national security information" is not unfettered and that Trump's disclosure "may actually have been illegal under federal law."
Harvard Law emeritus professor
Alan Dershowitz called the incident "the most serious charge ever made against a sitting president" and said that it was "devastating", with "very serious political, diplomatic, and international implications".
Aftermath Leaking of sensitive information by the U.S. has led to the review of intelligence sharing arrangements by key allies, and also a review by the
Department of Justice regarding the leaks from the United States. Soon after the Oval Office meeting, intelligence officials reportedly became concerned about the safety of a high-level CIA source within the
Putin government, and decided to bring him out of Russia. The source had refused an earlier offer to extract him. The extraction, or "exfiltration", was carried out sometime in 2017. CNN and other news sources reported on this extraction in September 2019, along with details about the Russian. One source told CNN that the decision to remove him was based in part on concern about the Trump administration's mishandling of classified information. A CIA spokesperson said the news reports were "misguided speculation", and a White House spokesperson said the reporting was "incorrect" and "has the potential to put lives in danger," although they did not specify why they considered the reporting flawed. == 2019 tweet revealing spy-satellite capabilities ==