Fed Up (film)

Fed Up shows how the first dietary guidelines issued by the U.S. government 30 years ago overlooked the role of dietary sugar in increasing risks of obesity, diabetes, and associated ill-health outcomes, particularly in children. Since these guidelines effectively condoned the unlimited addition of sugar to foods consumed by children, sugar consumption has greatly increased, obesity has skyrocketed, and generations of children have grown up far fatter than their parents. These children face impaired health and shorter lifespans as a result. As the relationship between the high-sugar diet and poor health has emerged, entrenched sugar industry interests with almost unlimited financial lobbying resources have nullified attempts by parents, schools, states, and in Congress to provide a healthier diet for children. The film concludes with a list of 20 companies, industry groups and politicians who refused to talk to the filmmakers. ==Production, premiere and release ==

The director, Stephanie Soechtig, said she followed some of the families struggling mightily with obesity, diabetes and other health issues for more than two years during the making of the film. The film premiered in competition category of U.S. Documentary Competition program at the 2014 Sundance Film Festival on January 19, 2014. After its premiere at the 2014 Sundance Film Festival, RADiUS-TWC acquired distribution rights of the film. The film was released on May 9, 2014, in the United States. ==Reception==

Fed Up received a positive response from critics. Review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes reports 80% of 66 film critics have given the film a positive review, with a rating average of 7 out of 10. In her review for LA Weekly, Amy Nicholson praised the film by saying "Fed Up is poised to be the Inconvenient Truth of the health movement. (Which makes sense - producer Laurie David worked on both.)" Geoffrey Berkshire in his review for Variety said "Stephanie Soechtig's documentary effectively gets the message out about America's addiction to unhealthy food." Robert Cameron Fowler from Indiewire in his review said "'Fed Up' is a glossy package that gets its warnings across loud and clear: we need to change what we eat." Justin Lowe of The Hollywood Reporter praises the film as highly relevant, though overly-detailed—the "Highly relevant film diminishes its central message with distracting details." As Manohla Dargis succinctly summarizes in her review for The New York Times: :Recent research ... indicates calories in fruit are not the same as those in soda, a conclusion that is part of the big picture in "Fed Up," a very good advocacy documentary ... A whirlwind of talking heads, found footage, scary statistics and cartoonish graphics, the movie is a fast, coolly incensed investigation into why people are getting fatter. It also includes some touching video self-portraits by some young people who belong to the almost 17 percent of children and adolescents, 2 to 19, who are considered obese. ==Criticism==

The documentary has been criticized by some doctors and scientists as occasionally misrepresentative of scientific evidence. The film makes the claim that drinking one soda a day will increase a child's chance of becoming obese by 60%. The scientists who are the authors of the study this statistic comes from state they cannot prove this causality, as the film claims, only an association. Harriet Hall, writing in Science-Based Medicine, stated the film's selection of experts consists mainly of politicians and journalists with few relevant nutritional scientists or doctors. She also argues the definitive pronouncements the film makes about the role of sugar are premature as there are too many other possible confounders such as lifestyle, total calorie consumption and the type of foods being eaten. Hall also goes on to provide a comprehensive list of statements the film claimed were facts but were not based on scientific evidence. She concludes by saying "the film will undoubtedly do some good by helping raise public awareness of childhood obesity" but wishes "it could have done so without misrepresenting the facts". ==See also==