AA-1 class and V-boats The
Gato-class boats were considered to be
fleet submarines, designed to operate as adjuncts to the main battle fleet, based on
standard-type battleships since
World War I. They were to scout out ahead of the fleet and report on the enemy fleet's composition, speed, and course, then they were to attack and whittle down the enemy in preparation for the main fleet action, a titanic gun battle between
battleships and
cruisers. This was an operational concept born from experience in World War I. To operate effectively in this role, a submarine had to have high surface speed, long range and endurance, and heavy armament. Limitations in submarine design and construction in the 1920s and 1930s made this combination of qualities very difficult to achieve. The U.S. Navy experimented constantly with this concept in the post-World War I years, producing a series of submarines with less than stellar qualities and reliability, the (also known as the T class) and the
V-boats, of which
V-1 through
V-3 were an unsuccessful attempt to produce a fleet submarine.
Tambor and Gar class By 1931, the experimental phase of fleet submarine development was over and the Navy began to make solid progress towards what would eventually be the
Gato class. By 1940, a much better developed industrial base and experience gained from the
Porpoise-, -, and ships resulted in the
Tambor and Gar classes. Finally, the U.S. Navy had hit the right combination of factors and now had the long-desired fleet submarine. Timing, however, conspired against the actual use of these boats in their assigned role. The
attack on Pearl Harbor on 7 December 1941 destroyed the Pacific Fleet battle line and along with it the concept of the battleship-led gun battle, as well as 20 years of submarine strategic concept development. It left the fleet submarine without a mission. Fortunately, the same capabilities that would have enabled these submarines to operate with the fleet made them superbly qualified for their new mission of commerce raiding against the
Japanese Empire. Timing, however, also conspired to make the
Gatos a mass-produced class of submarines. Six units were planned in FY41. In the immediate aftermath of the
Two-Ocean Navy Act 48 additional units were ordered. By the end of 1941, 33
Gato keels had been laid.
Gato class The
Gato-class design, with a top range of 11,000 nautical miles (20,000 km), was a near-duplicate of the preceding
Tambor- and
Gar-class submarines. The only significant differences were an increase in diving depth from to , and an extra five feet in length to allow the addition of a watertight bulkhead dividing the one large engine room in two, with two
diesel generators in each room. The
Gatos, along with nearly all of the U.S. Navy fleet-type submarines of World War II, were of partial
double-hulled construction. The inner pressure-resisting hull was wrapped by an outer, hydrodynamic hull. The voids between the two hulls provided space for fuel and ballast tanks. The outer hull merged with the pressure hull at both ends in the area of the
torpedo room bulkheads, hence the "partial" double hull. Operational experience with earlier submarines led the naval architects and engineers at the Navy's
Bureau of Construction and Repair to believe that they had been unduly conservative in their estimates of hull strength. Without changing the construction or thickness of the pressure hull steel, they decided that the
Gato-class ships would be fully capable of routinely operating at 300 feet, a increase in test depth over the preceding classes. The
Gatos were slow divers when compared to some German and British designs, but that was mostly because the
Gatos were significantly larger boats. Sufficient fuel bunkerage to provide the range necessary for 75-day patrols from
Hawaii to
Japan and back could be obtained only with a larger vessel, which would take longer to submerge than a smaller one. Acknowledging this limitation, the bureau designers incorporated a negative (sometimes called a "down express") tank into the design, which was flooded to provide a large amount of negative buoyancy at the start of the dive. Based on later wartime experience, the tank was normally kept full or nearly full at the surface, then emptied to a certain mark after the boat was submerged to restore neutral buoyancy. At the start of the war, these submarines could go from fully surfaced to periscope depth in about 45–50 seconds. The superstructure that sat atop the pressure hull provided the main walking deck when the vessel was surfaced and was free-flooding and full of water when it was submerged. When the dive began, the submarine would "hang" for a few extra seconds while this superstructure filled with water. In an attempt to speed this process, additional limber, or free-flooding, holes were drilled and cut into the superstructure to allow it to flood faster. By midwar, these measures combined with improved crew training got dive times down to 30–35 seconds, very fast for such a large submarine and acceptable to the boat's crew. The large size of these boats did negatively affect both surfaced and underwater maneuverability when compared to smaller submarines. No practical fix for this was available due to the limitations of the installed hydraulic systems used to move the rudder. Although a point of concern, the turning radius was still acceptable. After the war, a few fleet submarines were fitted with an additional rudder topside at the very stern. They had numerous crew comforts including showers, air conditioning, refrigerated storage for food, generous
freshwater distilling units, clothes washers, and bunks for nearly every crew member, luxuries virtually unheard of in other navies. The bureau designers felt that if a crew of 60–80 men were to be expected to conduct 75-day patrols in the warm waters of the Pacific, these types of features were vital to the health and efficiency of the crew, and could be added without impacting the boats’ warfighting abilities due to their large size. Air conditioning in particular had a very practical application, too, besides comfort. Should a submarine submerge for any length of time, the heat generated by the recently shut-down engines, electrical equipment, and body heat could quickly raise internal temperatures above . High humidity generated by tropical waters would condense and begin dripping into equipment, eventually causing electrical shorts and fires. Air conditioning, acting mostly as a dehumidifier, virtually eliminated this problem and greatly increased mechanical and electrical reliability. It proved to be a key factor in the success of these boats during World War II.
Torpedoes At the beginning of World War II the standard torpedo for US fleet submarines was the 21-inch,
Mark 14 torpedo. Due to a shortage of this torpedo, several substitutions were authorized, including using the shorter
Bliss-Leavitt Mark 9 torpedo and
Mark 10 torpedo, and the surface-fired
Bliss–Leavitt Mark 8 torpedo,
Mark 11 torpedo,
Mark 12 torpedo, and
Mark 15 torpedo. The surface-fired torpedoes required minor modifications. Due to their excessive length, marks 11, 12, and 15 torpedoes were limited to the aft torpedo tubes only. As torpedo production ramped up and the bugs were worked out of the Mark 14, substitutions were less common. As the war progressed, the Navy introduced the electric wakeless
Mark 18 Torpedo and the
Mark 23 torpedo, a simplified high-speed-only version of the Mark 14. Additionally, a small 19" swim-out acoustic homing
Mark 27 torpedo supplemented the armament in fleet boats for defense against escorts. Near the end of the war, the offensive
Mark 28 torpedo acoustic homing torpedo was introduced. Well after the war the
Mark 37 Torpedo was introduced.
Deck Guns Deck guns varied during the war. Many targets in the
Pacific War were
sampans or otherwise not worth a torpedo, so the deck gun was an important weapon. Most ships began the war with a
/50 caliber Mk. 17 gun (although some ships received older Mk. 6 mounts due to shortages). The gun was the model originally specified for the
Gato class, but war experience led to the removal of
/50 caliber Mk. 9 guns from old
S-class submarines to equip front-line ships. Beginning in late 1943, almost all were refitted with a
/25 caliber Mk. 17 gun, and some ships had two of these weapons. Additional antiaircraft guns included single 40 mm Bofors and twin 20 mm Oerlikon mounts, usually one of each.
Mine armament Like the previous
Tambor/
Gar classes, the
Gato class could substitute mines in place of torpedoes. For the Mk 10 and Mk 12 type mines used in World War II, each torpedo could be replaced by as many as two mines, giving the submarine a true maximum capacity of 48 mines. However, doctrine was to retain at least four torpedoes on mine laying missions, which further limits the capacity to 40 mines, and this is often stated as the maximum in various publications. In practice during the war, submarines went out with at least 8 torpedoes, and the largest minefields laid were 32 mines. Post-war, the Mk 49 mine replaced the Mk 12, while the larger Mk 27 mine (in actuality an acoustic-homing torpedo) was also carried which only allowed one mine replacing one torpedo. This mine could be set to travel 1000 to 5000 yards from the sub before deploying. (not to be confused with the Mk 27 homing torpedo)
Engine changes Cleveland Model 16-248 diesel engine Model 38D diesel engine Twelve submarines of this class built by Electric Boat (SS-253 to SS-264) received what would be the final installations of the
Hooven-Owens-Rentschler (H.O.R.)
double-acting diesel engine. The Navy had been tinkering with this engine off and on since 1937 because its unique design promised nearly twice the horsepower in a package the same size as other diesel engine types. However, the Hooven-Owens-Rentschler company ran into severe design and manufacturing problems, and these engines proved to have significant operational and maintenance issues. Frequent breakdowns and very poor reliability had destroyed these engines' reputation with the Navy, and they were all removed at the first opportunity and replaced by
General Motors Cleveland Model 16-278A V-type diesels. The other
Gato-class ships received either the
Fairbanks-Morse 38D 8-1/8 nine-cylinder
opposed-piston engine or the
General Motors Cleveland Model 16-248 V-type as original installations. These engines were hardy, rugged, and well liked by the crews and served the ships quite well. Both the Fairbanks-Morse and General Motors engines were
two-stroke cycle types. Two manufacturers supplied electric motors for the
Gato class.
Elliott Company motors were fitted primarily to boats with Fairbanks-Morse engines.
General Electric motors were fitted primarily to boats with General Motors engines, but some Fairbanks-Morse boats received General Electric motors.
Fairwater changes At the beginning of the war,
Gato-class ships, as well as the
Gar and
Tambor classes, had fully shrouded
fairwaters visually similar to modern nuclear submarines. Experience during the war led to the progressive reduction of this structure to reduce visibility and radar profile at the expense of underwater performance and foul-weather operating comfort. Most of the subs in postwar movies show the final result of these modifications. A side benefit of these modifications was the creation of convenient locations for antiaircraft guns. ==Boats in class==