Critical reception (pictured in 1955) received an
Oscar nomination and won a
Golden Globe for her performance in the film. Immediate reviews and reactions from critics were extremely polarized.
Bosley Crowther of
The New York Times wrote: "There is not an abundance of subtlety or the lately familiar Hitchcock bent toward significant and colorful scenery in this obviously low-budget job". Crowther called the "slow buildups to sudden shocks" reliably melodramatic but contested Hitchcock's psychological points, reminiscent of
Krafft-Ebing's studies, as less effective. While the film did not conclude satisfactorily for the critic, he commended the cast's performances as "fair". British critic
C. A. Lejeune was so offended that she not only walked out before the end, but permanently resigned her post as film critic for
The Observer. Other negative reviews stated, "a blot on an honorable career", "plainly a gimmick movie", and "merely one of those television shows padded out to two hours". The Catholic
Legion of Decency gave the film a B rating, meaning "morally objectionable in part". Critics from other New York newspapers, such as the
Daily News,
Daily Mirror, and
Village Voice were positive, writing: "Anthony Perkins' performance is the best of his career ... Janet Leigh has never been better", "played out beautifully", and "first American movie since
Touch of Evil (1958) to stand in the same creative rank as the great European films", respectively. A mixed review from the
New York Herald Tribune stated it was "rather difficult to be amused at the forms insanity may take [but nonetheless] keeps your attention like a snake-charmer". The
Los Angeles Times' Philip K. Scheuer remarked, in another mixed review, that the film was "one of his most brilliantly directed shockers and also his most disagreeable". The film ranked ninth on
Cahiers du Cinémas
Top 10 Films of the Year List in 1960. It was also well received in Florida, where the
Miami Heralds Jack Anderson wrote that "the pudgy master of suspense has dished up a real shocker. And I mean shocker.
Psycho saws away at every nerve right from its first scene with Janet Leigh in her unmentionables to its last gruesome moment". Robin Barrett of the
St. Petersburg Times wrote that "it's got all the ingredients of a typical Hitchcock if Hitchcock can be termed in any way "typical", and it's definitely his best effort to date, but it's unlike anything he's done in the past. Mr. H. has pledged us not to reveal the shocking ending or talk about the bizarre plot and shaking fear of diabolical Hitchcock reprisals — we won't". The film opened to a slightly more muted phrase in
Washington, D.C..
Richard L. Coe of
The Washington Post called it "marvelously gruesome [...] the sort of eerie, creaky, gobby Snap-Apple-Night that will find many sharooshed and others liverish". Harry MacArthur of Washington
Evening Star wrote that "Alfred Hitchcock lets his well-known glee with the gruesome romp all over the place in
Psycho, latest of his excursions in mayhem and suspense, at the Town Theater. This is a movie he might have made to prove the truth of his oft-quoted statement that he makes pictures for his own amusement. This does not mean, of course, that other moviegoers will not be amused—or shocked or even scared out of their wit by
Psycho. It does mean that this is a somewhat transparent example of the master's work in that you can see him sitting there behind it fiendishly dreaming up shocking situations for the sake of shock alone". Don Maclean of
The Washington Daily News urged the reader to "go see it if you like movies that shake you up. But if you're afraid to go in your house afterwards and keep watching behind you the rest of the night, don't blame me". A critic who used the Mae Tinee pseudonym in the
Chicago Daily Tribune wrote that "the old pro really poured it on in this production. I'm sure the wily Mr. Hitchcock had fun making this one. He used his camera with a sharp skill to achieve shock value the staring eye, the flowing blood, the sudden plunge of a knife. Audiences react much as they do on a high ride, giggling with nerves and excitement". In
Buffalo, Jeanette Eichel of the
Buffalo Evening News remarked that "Alfred Hitchcock, master of mystery, fuses fear and suspense in his shiver-and-shock show
Psycho in the Paramount Theater. His pride is that he does not let an audience down by misleading it. His clues are honest and few persons guess the outcome. He especially asked in an epilogue that patrons not betray the ending". A more mixed review came courtesy of Marjory Adams of the
Boston Daily Globe, who wrote that it "is far more macabre and mysterious than any of his previous full-length features. However, the settings are dreary and lack those magnificent backgrounds which Hitchcock employed so effectively in
North by Northwest,
Vertigo and
To Catch a Thief. Perhaps the old mystery master has been more influenced in
Psycho by his television programs than by his own classics such as
39 Steps and
Notorious. However, he gives the audience its money's worth. You see two murders committed, with accompanying gore and grisly details. There are so many shocks the theater might be connected to an electric battery". Helen Bower of the
Detroit Free Press was appalled by the film, opening her article by writing: "Gee, whiz, Mr. Hitchcock! Stick to making pictures like
North by Northwest, instead of one like
Psycho at the
Palms Theater, will you, huh? So okay,
Psycho gets some nervous laughter and a couple of yips of shock from the audience. But when even the great Hitchcock tries to make visual the dark side of star Anthony Perkin's psychopathic personality, the effect is ridiculous. Perhaps the get-up would be the only thing a young man in Perkins' state of mind could produce. All the same, it makes this phase of Hitch's horror movie look laughably corny". Glenn C. Pullen of the
Cleveland Plain Dealer praised the performances of Leigh and Perkins, opening his review by writing that "if the movie theater business has any ills, according to 'Doctor' Alfred Hitchcock's diagnosis, they can be cured promptly by some blood-letting horrors, a healthy shot of mystery juice, and a chilling bath in bizarre melodrama. This whimsical prescription by the old master of suspense films again proved to be eminently correct in the case of his long-heralded
Psycho". Francis Melrose of the
Rocky Mountain News praised Leigh's and Perkins' performances and called the film "a shocker that hits you like a pile driver. You most likely will be stunned and reeling as you come out of the theater". In the United Kingdom, the film broke attendance records at the London Plaza Cinema, but nearly all British film critics gave it poor reviews, questioning Hitchcock's taste and judgment and calling it his worst film ever. Reasons cited for this were the lack of preview screenings; the fact that they had to turn up at a set time as they would not be admitted after the film had started; their dislike of the gimmicky promotion; and Hitchcock's
expatriate status. Dick Richards of the
Daily Mirror called it "a fairly ordinary, sometimes ridiculous melodrama". Jack Bentley of the
Sunday Mirror wrote that "Alfred Hitchcock, the 'master of suspense', has sadly underestimated the intelligence of his audience in presenting this gory story about a homicidal maniac. For his publicity department's entreaties to cinemagoers not to reveal the ending is totally unnecessary. I soon tumbled to it—and so will you. There are, however, excellent performances from Vera Miles, Janet Leigh and, in particular, Anthony Perkins". Ernest Betts of the
Sunday People called it a "mad, morbid and monstrous film [in which] Hitchcock mixes old-fashioned hokum and the jargon of the psychiatrist to stretch your nerves to screaming point". In a scathing observation, Frank Lewis of the
Sunday Dispatch told viewers to "ignore those pleas to keep the ending secret. Anyone above the mental age of 10 will know, only too well, what's coming". A critic in
The Daily Telegraph who only gave the initials of R.P.M.G. wrote that the film was "for this director, a disappointing murder melodrama with more absurdities than thrills. It is out of the ordinary only in that it is a little unpleasant. The most rewarding feature is Anthony Perkins' study of the murderer suffering as the title foretells from psychological disorders. Janet Leigh also gives a pleasing performance as the girl he kills with a knife while she is under a shower". A critic for the same newspaper,
Patrick Gibbs, wrote that "it almost seems as if the director were pulling our legs and by way of improving the joke he leads us up the garden path—like
Haydn in the '
Surprise Symphony'—with some serious completely realistic opening passages typically full of tension and suspense". C.A. Lejeune of
The Observer wrote that "the stupid air of mystery and portent surrounding
Psychos presentation strikes me as a tremendous error. It makes the film automatically suspect". However, an unidentified critic in
The Guardian, then based in
Manchester, was somewhat more favorable in his reaction, saying that the film offered "no more than quite a good sample of the old Hitchcock style, rich in suspense, tension, and the rest of it; and it is also typical in being brilliant in patches and, as a whole, quite implausible".
Pauline Kael for
The New Yorker wrote that it was one film that made her feel like it was "borderline immoral" because of what she saw as the "director's cheerful complicity with the killer, he had a sadistic glee" that she couldn't quite deal with. Critics later reassessed the film in a far more positive matter in the coming months after release.
Time magazine switched its opinion from "Hitchcock bears down too heavily in this one" to "superlative" and "masterly", and
Bosley Crowther changed his initial opinion and included it in his Top Ten list of 1960, deeming it a "bold psychological mystery picture.... [I]t represented expert and sophisticated command of emotional development with cinematic techniques".
Psycho was criticized for inspiring other filmmakers to show gory content; three years later,
Blood Feast, considered to be the first "
splatter film", was released. Inspired by
Psycho,
Hammer Film Productions launched a series of mystery thrillers including
The Nanny (1965) starring
Bette Davis and
William Castle's
Homicidal (1961) was followed by a slew of more than thirteen other splatter films. Modern reviews have been overwhelmingly positive. On the review aggregator website
Rotten Tomatoes,
Psycho has an approval rating of 97% based on 118 reviews, with an average score of 9.3/10. The site's critical consensus reads: "Infamous for its shower scene, but immortal for its contribution to the horror genre. Because
Psycho was filmed with tact, grace, and art, Hitchcock didn't just create modern horror, he validated it". On
Metacritic, the film has a weighted average score of 97 out of 100 based on 18 critics, indicating "universal acclaim". In his 1998 review of
Psycho film critic
Roger Ebert summarised the film's enduring appeal, writing:
Box office In its opening week,
Psycho grossed $46,500 at the DeMille and a record $19,500 at the Baronet.
Psycho broke box-office records in Japan and the rest of Asia, France, Britain, South America, the United States, and Canada, and was a moderate success in Australia for a brief period. It went on to become the second
highest-grossing film of 1960, behind
Spartacus, earning a box office gross of $32 million, which generated approximately $9.1 million in North American
theatrical rentals.
Psycho remains the most commercially successful film of Hitchcock's career. ==Accolades==