1540 was to be a year of triumphs and tears for the Cromwell family. In January, Elizabeth was appointed to the household of the new Queen, Anne of Cleves. In March, during a virtual witch-hunt against 'heretical' preachers by
Stephen Gardiner, Bishop of Winchester, Gregory Cromwell requested Henry Dowes to write a letter detailing the recantation of William Jerome, Vicar of Stepney. This was significant, as Stepney was Thomas Cromwell's church, where he and his family worshipped. Gardiner was firing a warning shot in his rival's direction. Still rising in royal favour, Thomas Cromwell was created
Earl of Essex on 17 April, and his son, Gregory assumed the courtesy title of Lord Cromwell (from his father's secondary title of Baron Cromwell, of Wimbledon in the County of Surrey). The arms granted to Gregory Cromwell were four coats, quarterly; 1st, quarterly, per fess indented, azure, and or, four lions passant, counterchanged; 2nd, per fess, or and gules, on a pale between two lis, azure, and two pelicans of the first, a pelican and lis, all counterchanged; 3rd, azure, on a fess, between three lions rampant, a rose, gules, between two Cornish choughs; 4th, Prior, as before, and the motto, "Faire mon devoir". On 18 April, Thomas Cromwell was made
Lord Great Chamberlain.
The May Day jousts, 1540 In May 1540, Gregory, now Lord Cromwell, and his cousin
Richard Cromwell took part in the May Day jousts which were held at the Palace of Westminster. The jousts began on Saturday, 1 May, and lasted for a week. The jousts had been announced in France, Flanders, Scotland and Spain for all who would compete against the challengers of England. The challengers included Sir
John Dudley, Sir
Thomas Seymour, Sir
Thomas Poyninge, Sir
George Carew,
Anthony Kingston, and Richard Cromwell. The challengers entered the lists that day richly dressed, their horses trapped in white velvet, with knights and gentlemen riding ahead of them, dressed in white velvet and white sarcenet, and all their servants in white sarcenet doublets and hose, in the Burgundian fashion. To joust against them, forty-six defendants entered, led by
Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey, including Lord
William Howard, Lord
Edward Clinton, Lord Gregory Cromwell, and others, who were all richly dressed. After the jousting had ended the challengers rode to
Durham Place, which was lavishly decorated, with great cupboards of plate on display and where they kept open household during the tournament. Delicious foods and drinks were plentiful and minstrels played continually. Elaborate feasts and suppers were provided there, which were attended by the King, the Queen and her ladies, all the court, and all other comers. The guests "were served every meal with their own servants after the manner of war, their drum warning all the officers of household against every meal." On the second day of the jousts, Anthony Kingston and Richard Cromwell were made knights. Cromwell so impressed the King with his valour, that he was given a diamond ring from the King's own finger.
A gathering storm The wave of success was to be short-lived for Thomas Cromwell.
Stephen Gardiner,
Bishop of Winchester, a traditionalist conservative, was determined to destroy his arch-enemy, Cromwell, by accusing him of supporting heretical preachers, thereby undoing his programme of religious reforms. At the same time, Cromwell's political rival and religious conservative,
Thomas Howard, 3rd Duke of Norfolk, who had pushed hard for the
Act of Six Articles to be passed in Parliament, was rising in favour and fast becoming a threat. The Act of Six Articles, which reaffirmed certain Catholic principles in Henry VIII's Church of England, had been passed in May 1539. Henry VIII had now drawn a line in the sand on religious reform and Cromwell found himself in an untenable position with regard to his reformist policies. French Ambassador
Charles de Marillac noted "the division among this King's ministers, who are trying to destroy each other." Cromwell's party seemed to have the upper hand, however the situation was about to take a turn for the worse. , The Windsor version of the Holbein miniature Cromwell was safe only as long as he retained royal favour. However, the King had found his new wife Anne of Cleves particularly unappealing and as she was no longer of any political use he wanted a divorce. Cromwell realised that a divorce would result in a massive loss of face for him as the promoter of the marriage and its associated political machinations and that it could lead not only to his ruin, but also to the end of the Reformation in England. Taking advantage of the King's marital discontent and Thomas Cromwell's hesitation over the divorce, Gardiner and Norfolk together came up with a plan to bring down the Earl of Essex. Norfolk used his pretty young niece,
Catherine Howard, at court, to distract the King; and while Henry VIII was distracted, he and Gardiner plotted their rival's demise. Stephen Gardiner entertained the King and the girl in his episcopal palace, while their agents were searching for any damning evidence that could be used against Cromwell. Feeling threatened, after the arrest of
Richard Sampson,
Bishop of Chichester, Gardiner and Norfolk decided to make a preemptive strike. "Cromwell was accused of the sacramentarian heresy, or denial of the real presence. The charge with its overtones of
anabaptism and anarchy, temporarily overbalanced Henry" and with the deposition by
Thomas Wriothesley that implied Cromwell was stalling over the divorce, the King was persuaded to order Cromwell's arrest. Henry was made to see his chief minister as an obstacle to Anne's removal and replacement by Catherine. Gardiner was more than happy to provide the King with the means to a speedy divorce and "false knaves",
Richard Rich and Michael Throgmorton were easily procured to make further allegations to the King about the Earl of Essex."
Arrest Thomas Cromwell was arrested suddenly at a council meeting at 3.00 p.m. on the afternoon of 10 June 1540, on trumped-up charges of treason and heresy, taken to the
Tower of London and his possessions seized. The French Ambassador
Charles de Marillac described his arrest in the Council Chamber at Westminster. in the time of Henry VIII As soon as the Captain of the Guard declared his charge to make him prisoner, Cromwell in a rage cast his bonnet on the ground, saying to the Duke of Norfolk and others of the
Privy Council assembled there that this was the reward of his services, and that he appealed to their consciences as to whether he was a traitor; but since he was treated thus he renounced all pardon, as he had never thought to have offended, and only asked the King not to make him languish long. Thereupon some said he was a traitor, others that he should be judged according to the laws he had made, which were so sanguinary that often words spoken inadvertently with good intention had been constituted high treason. The Duke of Norfolk having reproached him with some "villennyes" done by him, snatched off the
order of St George which he bore on his neck, and the Lord High Admiral, to show himself as great an enemy in adversity as he had been thought a friend in prosperity, untied the Garter. Then, by a door which opens upon the water, he was put in a boat and taken to the Tower without the people of this town suspecting it until they saw all the King's archers under Mr. Cheyney at the door of the prisoner's
house, where they made an inventory of his goods. According to the sixteenth-century chronicler
Edward Hall, those who genuinely mourned Cromwell's arrest were far outnumbered by those who rejoiced. Cromwell, who was courageous enough to implement radical changes in an inherently conservative society like England, was by no means a popular man. Marillac, reporting the news of Cromwell's arrest to Francis I, wrote that "considering that public affairs thereby entirely change their course, especially as regards the innovations in religion of which Cromwell was principal author, the news seems of such importance that it ought to be written forthwith" and in another letter to
Anne de Montmorency noted "the division among this King's ministers, who are trying to destroy each other. Cromwell's party seemed the strongest lately by the taking of the dean of the Chapel, bp. of Chichester, but it seems quite overthrown by the taking of the said lord Cromwell, who was chief of his band, and there remain only on his side the abp. of Canterbury, who dare not open his mouth, and the lord Admiral, who has long learnt to bend to all winds, and they have for open enemies the duke of Norfolk and the others. The thing is the more marvellous as it was unexpected by everyone." Gregory would have been nearby, in the House of Commons, at Westminster, when his father was arrested and might have sent word to his wife Elizabeth, who was at court attending Queen Anne. He and his wife found themselves in a very vulnerable position, and were faced with the possibility of their own arrest. Having been dependants of Thomas Cromwell, they found themselves homeless—all Cromwell's houses, lands, money, and goods were seized by the King (Leeds Castle was soon in the hands of Sir
Anthony St Leger)—and, no doubt, in dire financial straits. It is highly probable that Elizabeth's brother, Edward Seymour, then Earl of Hertford, interceded with the king on the couple's behalf, gave them advice, and provided them with a place to live, and that Sir Ralph Sadler was secretly sending news to Gregory about his father. Gregory's marriage to Elizabeth—the sister of the late Queen Jane and his connection to Edward Seymour, Earl of Hertford, now a favourite of Henry VIII—may have afforded him a degree of protection from the King's wrath. There is no record of Gregory or his wife being questioned in relation to Thomas Cromwell's arrest.
Prisoner in the Tower circa 1554–57, drawn by
Anton van den Wyngaerde The case against Thomas Cromwell was weak; it was well known that Cromwell favoured religious reform, though he had not proceeded any further with his programme of reforms than the King would allow, and his every act had been authorised by the King. Cromwell had not broken any laws, contravened any statutes or disobeyed any royal proclamations. Therefore, he was condemned without a trial and his sentence was later confirmed by an act of attainder. There are no surviving records of Gregory and Elizabeth's movements at this time. From the day of Thomas Cromwell's arrest until 16 June, during which time he was formally questioned by Norfolk and
Thomas Audeley, he gave written answers to questions and wrote detailed letters at the King's command, there was still a faint hope of a reprieve. However, on 17 June, the bill of
attainder was heard in Parliament for the first time and Cromwell would have known his terrible fate. Ominously, on a deposition to the King, he wrote "All these articles be tr[ue by the] death I shall die, and m[ore] as more plainly app[eareth by a] letter written with my [own hand] sent by Mr. Secretary [unto] the King's Highness." Thomas Cromwell wrote a desperate letter from the Tower to the King to plead his innocence and appeal to him to be merciful to his son and the rest of his family. "Sir, upon [my kne]es I most humbly beseech your most gracious Majesty [to be goo]d and gracious lord to my poor son, the good and virtu[ous lady his] wife, and their poor children" According to
John Foxe,
Ralph Sadler alone dared to carry to the King his letter pleading for mercy. From this Letter we learn that Henry VIII sent Cromwell money while in the Tower and it appears to have given him more than a hope of life. Moreover, Thomas Cromwell was granted the extraordinary 'privilege' of being told of the charges against him and who his accusers were. When Thomas Howard, 3rd Duke of Norfolk was himself arrested in 1546, he "prayed the lords to intercede with the king, that his accusers might be brought face to face, to say what they had against him; and he did not doubt but it should appear he was falsely accused. He desired to have no more favour than Cromwell had, he himself being present when Cromwell was examined." He added that Cromwell "desired, if he might not see his accusers, that he might at least know what the matters were; and if he did not answer truly to every point, he desired not to live an hour longer. He had always been pursued by great enemies about the king; so that his fidelity was tried like gold." On 29 June, the act of attainder was passed in both houses of parliament and Thomas Cromwell's fate was sealed. It is not known whether Gregory Cromwell was present in the
House of Commons during the proceedings against his father. In July 1540, fearing for her family's future security, Elizabeth wrote the following letter of submission to Henry VIII: "After the bounden duty of my most humble submission unto your excellent majesty, whereas it hath pleased the same, of your mere mercy and infinite goodness, notwithstanding the heinous trespasses and most grievous offences of my father-in-law, yet so graciously to extend your benign pity towards my poor husband and me, as the extreme indigence and poverty wherewith my said father-in-law's most detestable offences hath oppressed us, is thereby right much holpen and relieved, like as I have of long time been right desirous presently as well to render most humble thanks, as also to desire continuance of the same your highness' most benign goodness. So, considering your grace's most high and weighty affairs at this present, fear of molesting or being troublesome unto your highness hath dissuaded me as yet otherwise to sue unto your grace than alonely by these my most humble letters, until your grace's said affairs shall be partly overpast. Most humbly beseeching your majesty in the mean season mercifully to accept this my most obedient suit, and to extend your accustomed pity and gracious goodness towards my said poor husband and me, who never hath, nor, God willing, never shall offend your majesty, but continually pray for the prosperous estate of the same long time to remain and continue." This undated letter is placed at the end of July 1540 in
Letters and Papers of the Reign of Henry VIII. It is possible that it was written while Thomas Cromwell was imprisoned in the Tower, as Elizabeth refers to her father-in-law, and not her
late father-in-law. Moreover, it was customary at that time to write "may his soul God pardon" or something similar when referring to someone who had recently died, which she did not do. The letter may have been written on the advice of her brother or at the King's command. The King was inclined to be generous and Elizabeth was to be included in the future Queen Catherine Howard's household as one of her attendant ladies. Richard Hilles, a merchant, wrote in a letter dated 28 February 1541, "some think it was a like artifice in the King to confer his title and many of his domains while he was yet in prison upon his son Gregory, who was almost a fool, in order that he might the more readily confess his offences at execution." There is absolutely no evidence that Gregory was a fool, and much to prove that he was intelligent and accomplished. Moreover, Gregory Cromwell was not created
Baron Cromwell by letters patent until December 1540 and did not receive any royal grants before February 1541. His courtesy title of Lord Cromwell was forfeit after his father's arrest, although he did continue to receive the profits from the property alienated to his use and his heirs by his father in November 1538. This property included the manors and lordships of
Oakham and
Langham (Rutland),
Clapthorne,
Hackleton and
Piddington (Northamptonshire), and
Blaston (Leicestershire), with the
advowson of Blaston church, and the manors of
North Elmham and
Beetley (Norfolk). Gregory was still receiving the profits from Langham in April 1541, his entitlement was then being questioned and which was later resolved in his favour. Hilles' comments can be dismissed as unsubstantiated gossip, although there is always the possibility that the mercurial Henry VIII promised Cromwell, while he was in the Tower, to be a "good and gracious lord" to his son.
Death of Thomas Cromwell Cromwell's letter had moved the King, who had asked for it to be read to him three times. However, it was not enough to save his life. Thomas Cromwell was beheaded on
Tower Hill on 28 July 1540. Since Thomas was attainted, Gregory could not succeed his father as Earl of Essex and Baron Cromwell (of Wimbledon in the County of Surrey). inside the
Tower of LondonGregory and Elizabeth were not implicated, although it took many months before their desperate situation was to be resolved. Their lives were still in danger from an increasingly paranoid king. It is unknown if Gregory and his family were present at Thomas Cromwell's execution or if permission was given by the King to bury his beloved father with dignity, as Sir Thomas More's family had, under the floor in the
Chapel of St Peter ad Vincula in the Tower. Among those who genuinely mourned Thomas Cromwell, besides Gregory and his family, were his protégés and close friends: Sir
Ralph Sadler had lived in Cromwell's household as a boy, was educated by him and had known Gregory Cromwell since he was born. Thomas Cromwell was godfather to Sadler's first two sons. It was Sadler who managed to acquire Holbein's
portrait of Thomas Cromwell and keep it hidden during the remaining years of the reign of Henry VIII. The poet Sir
Thomas Wyatt penned an eloquent lamentation of his personal loss. The
sonnet speaks of a man who was not only his patron, but his friend, and confidant. The pillar perish'd is whereto I leant,The strongest stay of my unquiet mind;The like of it no man again can find,From east to west still seeking though he went,To mine unhap. For hap away hath rentOf all my joy the very bark and rind:And I, alas, by chance am thus assign'dDaily to mourn, till death do it relent.But since that thus it is by destiny,What can I more but have a woful heart;My pen in plaint, my voice in careful cry,My mind in woe, my body full of smart;And I myself, myself always to hate,Till dreadful death do ease my doleful state.Sir Thomas Wyatt
Aftermath At the time of his arrest in 1540, Thomas Cromwell was one of the wealthiest landowners in England. This was "the end result of an active decade buying and selling lands, augmented by large monastic and other royal grants". Gregory as his sole heir should have inherited a vast fortune. Instead, over the next few years his father's lands and property were distributed by the King to others. Gregory Cromwell, his wife and their children faced an uncertain future. For several months after Thomas Cromwell's execution, Henry VIII remained convinced of his late chief minister's guilt and anyone who had been closely associated with the late Earl of Essex was regarded with suspicion and closely watched. Tensions within the court were running high. Matters came to a head on the evening of 17 January 1541, when Ambassadors
Eustace Chapuys and Charles de Marillac reported to their masters that Sir Thomas Wyatt, Sir Ralph Sadler and unnamed others had been arrested. The following morning, they were taken from Hampton Court, with their hands bound, and accompanied by 24 archers, to the Tower. Marillac wrote to Montmorency that Thomas Wyatt "was led to the Tower so bound and fettered that one must think ill, for the custom is to lead them to prison free" noting that it "must be some great matter for he has for enemies all who leagued against Cromwell, whose minion he was." Sir Ralph Sadler was able to clear himself and was released in a few days. Sir Thomas Wyatt was set free the following March, at the request of Queen Catherine Howard. Sadler must have provided some very persuasive evidence to his interrogators in the Tower, sufficient not only to secure his own release, but enough to convince the King to question his late chief minister's fate. The French ambassador, Marillac was to write to Montmorency on 3 March 1541 that Henry VIII had reproached his ministers for Cromwell's death, "saying that, upon light pretexts, by false accusations, they made him put to death the most faithful servant he ever had". It appears that Henry VIII no longer considered Thomas Cromwell to have been guilty of the charges against him, that he had been misled by his councillors and now regretted the loss of an able minister. ==Peerage and knighthood==