Early political activities in his office in 1986 After a visit to
Laos in 1969, made at the request of the
White House, and that government officials were covering up POW/MIA investigations to avoid revealing a drug-smuggling operation used to finance a secret war in Laos. Perot engaged in unauthorized back-channel discussions with Vietnamese officials in the late 1980s, which led to fractured relations between Perot and the
Reagan and
George H. W. Bush administrations. Perot also launched private investigations of, and attacks upon,
United States Department of Defense official
Richard Armitage. Perot did not support President
George H. W. Bush, and vigorously opposed the United States' involvement in the 1990–1991
Persian Gulf War. He unsuccessfully urged Senators to vote against the war resolution, and began to consider a presidential run.
1992 presidential campaign and
George H. W. Bush at the third presidential debate at
Michigan State University, October 19, 1992. On February 20, 1992, Perot appeared on
CNN's
Larry King Live and announced his intention to run as an independent if his supporters could get his name on the ballot in all 50 states. With such declared policies as balancing the
federal budget, favoring certain types of gun control, ending the outsourcing of jobs and enacting
electronic direct democracy via "electronic
town halls", he became a potential candidate and soon polled roughly even with the two major-party candidates. Perot denounced Congress for its inaction in a speech at the
National Press Club in Washington, D.C., on March 18, 1992; he said: Perot's candidacy received increasing media attention when the competitive phase of the primary season ended for the two major parties. With the insurgent candidacies of Republican
Pat Buchanan and Democrat
Jerry Brown winding down, Perot was the natural beneficiary of
populist resentment toward establishment politicians. On May 25, 1992, he was featured on the cover of
Time with the title "Waiting for Perot", an allusion to
Samuel Beckett's play
Waiting for Godot. Several months before the Democratic and Republican conventions, Perot filled the vacuum of election news, as his supporters began petition drives to get him on the ballot in all 50 states. This sense of momentum was reinforced when Perot employed two savvy campaign managers in Democrat
Hamilton Jordan and Republican
Ed Rollins. While Perot was pondering whether to run for office, his supporters established a campaign organization
United We Stand America. Perot was late in making formal policy proposals, but most of what he did call for was intended to reduce the deficit, such as a
fuel tax increase and cutbacks to
Social Security. In June, Perot led a
Gallup poll with 39% of the vote. In July, the Perot campaign fell into disarray and his polls fell sharply. The
1992 Democratic National Convention was held on Monday, July 13 through Thursday, July 16, during which time there was increased media coverage of the general election.
The Milwaukee Sentinel reported that Perot's campaign managers were becoming increasingly disillusioned by Perot's unwillingness to follow their advice to be more specific on issues, The
St. Petersburg Times reported such tactics as forcing volunteers to sign
loyalty oaths. Perot's poll numbers had slipped to 25%, and his advisers warned that if he continued to ignore them, he would fall into single digits. Hamilton Jordan (a high-ranking manager in the Perot campaign) allegedly threatened to quit, but senior campaign officials denied this. On July 15, Ed Rollins resigned after Perot fired advertisement specialist
Hal Riney, who had worked with Rollins on the
Reagan campaign. Rollins would later claim that a member of the campaign accused him of being a Bush plant with ties to the
Central Intelligence Agency. Amid the chaos, Perot's support fell to 20%. The next day, Perot announced on
Larry King Live that he would not seek the presidency. He explained that he did not want the
House of Representatives to decide the election if the result caused the electoral college to be split. Perot eventually stated the reason was that he received threats that digitally altered photographs would be released by the Bush campaign to sabotage his daughter's wedding. Whatever his reasons for withdrawing, his reputation was badly damaged. Many of his supporters felt betrayed, and public opinion polls subsequently showed a largely negative view of Perot that was absent before his decision to end the campaign. In September, he qualified for all 50 state ballots. On October 1, he announced his intention to re-enter the presidential race. He campaigned in 16 states and spent an estimated $12.3 million of his own money. Perot employed the innovative strategy of purchasing half-hour blocks of time on major networks for
infomercial-type campaign advertisements; this advertising garnered more viewership than many sitcoms, with one Friday night program in October attracting 10.5 million viewers. At one point in June, Perot led the polls with 39% (versus 31% for Bush and 25% for Clinton). Just prior to the debates, Perot received 7–9% support in nationwide polls. The debates likely played a significant role in his ultimate receipt of almost 19% of the popular vote. Although his answers during the debates were often general, Frank Newport of
Gallup concluded that Perot "convincingly won the first debate, coming in significantly ahead of both the Democratic challenger Clinton and incumbent President George H.W. Bush". In the debate, he remarked: In the
1992 election, he received 18.9% of the popular vote, about 19,741,065 votes, but no
electoral college votes, making him the most successful non-major-party presidential candidate in terms of share of the popular vote since
Theodore Roosevelt in the
1912 election. Unlike Perot, however, multiple third-party candidates since Roosevelt had won electoral college votes:
Robert La Follette in 1924,
Strom Thurmond in 1948, and
George Wallace in 1968. Compared with Thurmond and Wallace, who polled very strongly in a small number of states, Perot's vote was more evenly spread across the country. Perot managed to finish second in two states: in
Maine, Perot received 30.44% of the vote—ahead of part-time resident Bush's 30.39% (Clinton won Maine with 38.77%); and in
Utah, Perot received 27.34% of the vote—ahead of Clinton's 24.65% (Bush won Utah with 43.36%). Although Perot did not win a state, he received a plurality of votes in some counties. His popular vote total is still by far the most ever garnered for a non-major-party candidate, almost double the previous record set by Wallace in 1968. A detailed analysis of voting demographics revealed that Perot's support drew heavily from across the political spectrum, with 20% of his votes coming from self-described
liberals, 27% from self-described
conservatives, and 53% coming from self-described moderates. Economically, however, the majority of Perot voters (57%) were middle class, earning between $15,000 and $49,000 annually, with the bulk of the remainder drawing from the upper-middle class (29% earning more than $50,000 annually). Exit polls also showed that 38% of Perot voters would have otherwise voted for Bush, and 38% would have voted for Clinton. Though there were widespread claims that Perot acted as a "spoiler", post-election analysis suggested that his presence in the race likely did not affect the outcome. According to
Seymour Martin Lipset, the 1992 election had several unique characteristics. Voters felt that economic conditions were worse than they actually were, which harmed Bush. A strong third-party candidate was a rare event. Liberals launched a backlash against 12 years of a conservative White House. The chief factor was Clinton's uniting his party, and winning over a number of heterogeneous groups. In 2016,
FiveThirtyEight described the theory that Perot was a spoiler as "unlikely". Based on his performance in the popular vote in 1992, Perot was entitled to receive federal election funding for 1996. Perot remained in the public eye after the election and championed opposition to the
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). During the campaign, he had urged voters to listen for the "
giant sucking sound" of American jobs heading south to Mexico should NAFTA be ratified.
Reform Party and 1996 presidential campaign 1996 presidential campaign Perot tried to keep his movement alive through the mid-1990s, continuing to speak about the increasing national debt. He was a prominent campaigner against NAFTA, and frequently claimed that American manufacturing jobs would go to Mexico. On November 10, 1993, Perot debated with then-Vice President
Al Gore on the issue on
Larry King Live with an audience of 16 million viewers. Perot's behavior during the debate was a source of mirth thereafter, including his repeated pleas to "let me finish" in his southern drawl. The debate was seen by many as effectively ending Perot's political career. Support for NAFTA went from 34% to 57%. In 1995, he founded the
Reform Party, which focused on
fiscal conservatism and
electoral reform, and won their presidential nomination for the
1996 United States presidential election. His vice presidential running mate was
Pat Choate. Because of the ballot access laws, he had to run as an independent on many state ballots. Perot received 8% of the popular vote in 1996, lower than in the 1992 race, but still an unusually successful third-party showing by U.S. standards. He spent much less of his own money in this race than he had four years prior, and he also allowed other people to contribute to his campaign, unlike his prior race. One common explanation for the decline was Perot's exclusion from the
presidential debates, based on the preferences of the Democratic and Republican party candidates. Law professor
Jamie Raskin filed a lawsuit over Perot's exclusion years later.
Later activities In the
2000 presidential election, Perot refused to become openly involved with the internal Reform Party dispute between supporters of
Pat Buchanan and
John Hagelin. Perot was reportedly unhappy with what he saw as the disintegration of the party, as well as his own portrayal in the press; thus, he chose to remain quiet. He appeared on
Larry King Live four days before the election and endorsed
George W. Bush for president. Despite his earlier opposition to NAFTA, Perot remained largely silent about expanded use of guest-worker visas in the United States, with Buchanan supporters attributing this silence to his corporate reliance on foreign workers. In 2005, Perot was asked to testify before the
Texas Legislature in support of proposals to extend access to technology to students, including making laptops available to them. He supported changing the process of buying textbooks by making
e-books available and by allowing schools to purchase books at the local level instead of going through the state. In an April 2005 interview, Perot expressed concern about the state of progress on issues that he had raised in his presidential runs. In January 2008, Perot publicly came out against Republican candidate
John McCain and endorsed
Mitt Romney for president. He also announced that he would soon be launching a new website with updated economic graphs and charts. In June 2008, his blog launched, focusing on
entitlements (
Medicare,
Medicaid,
Social security), the U.S. national debt, and related issues. In 2012, Perot endorsed Romney for president again. Perot did not give any endorsements for the
2016 election. ==Political views==