Industry Several theater-owner groups warned that the proposed Netflix–Warner Bros. deal would harm theatrical film distribution. Cinema United, a major trade association, called the acquisition an "unprecedented threat", arguing that Netflix's streaming-first strategy might reduce theatrical releases, cut box-office revenue, and hurt independent cinemas. The group urged regulators to scrutinize the transaction, saying the consolidation could affect theaters worldwide. The
Directors Guild of America (DGA) reportedly expressed concerns over the Netflix–Warner Bros. merger, noting that a major consolidation could threaten competitive opportunities for talent and reduce diversification in studio and streaming-driven content. The
Writers Guild of America (WGA) stated that the proposed Netflix–Warner Bros. merger "must be blocked", arguing that "the world's largest streaming company swallowing one of its biggest competitors is what antitrust laws were designed to prevent."
SAG-AFTRA raised concerns about the proposed Netflix–Warner Bros. transaction, saying it could affect creative workers and the broader entertainment industry. The union stated that any merger should increase production and protect jobs, and said its final position would depend on a full review of the proposal. Unlike some other industry groups, SAG-AFTRA had not called for the deal to be blocked.
James Cameron publicly threw his support behind Paramount Skydance in its bidding war for WBD, claiming that a Netflix takeover "would be a disaster" for the studio's long-term creative future.
Roy Price wrote that an acquisition of Warner Bros. by Netflix could lead to fewer shows being made and "a narrower range of storytelling" with "decision making around one organization's or one individual's point of view".
Cinema United warned a congressional committee that an acquisition of WBD by either Netflix or Paramount Skydance could negatively affect movie theater operators. The trade association said further industry consolidation could reduce the number of films released theatrically and increase studios' leverage in negotiations with exhibitors. Cinema United outlined its concerns in a statement submitted to a
U.S. House Judiciary Committee antitrust subcommittee holding a hearing on competition in digital streaming. On January 29, 2026, a coalition of indie filmmakers, theater operators and nonprofits has reportedly sent a letter to the
National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG), asking state attorney generals to block Netflix's accepted $82.7 billion acquisition of WBD's studio and streaming businesses, citing antitrust concerns. In February 2026, several Hollywood labor groups, including the Directors Guild of America,
Producers Guild of America, and Writers Guild of America, submitted statements to a Senate Judiciary antitrust subcommittee expressing concerns about the potential sale of WBD. On February 5, 2026, Paramount CEO David Ellison published an open letter to the UK creative community outlining commitments tied to Paramount's bid for WBD, including increased content investment, continued theatrical releases, and preserving HBO as a distinct brand. Ellison described a Paramount–WBD combination as pro-competitive and criticized the rival Netflix deal as potentially creating excessive market power, a claim Netflix disputed. He also highlighted Paramount's UK operations and pledged support for competition and the creative workforce. Cinema United told lawmakers the Netflix–Warner Bros. deal could cut theatrical releases, increase consolidation, and harm theaters and local economies. Several entertainment unions expressed opposition to the proposed Netflix–Warner Bros. transaction, including the Writers Guild of America, which urged lawmakers to block the deal. Senator
Adam Schiff and Representative
Laura Friedman asked for details on U.S. production, union jobs, AI safeguards, and competition, seeking responses by February 15, 2026, to assess the impact of both deals on Hollywood workers. On February 13, 2026,
AGC Studios chairman
Stuart Ford criticized Netflix's proposed acquisition of Warner Bros. during a keynote at the European Film Market in Berlin, warning it could harm the film industry's financial model. He said a studio-streamer merger might reduce backend participation and residuals for producers and talent, though he noted that stronger theatrical commitments could lessen some concerns. Ford argued that streaming-driven consolidation could threaten traditional revenue-sharing practices that support industry workers. In February 2026, the board of WBD reportedly reconsidered renewed discussions with
Paramount Skydance regarding a revised acquisition proposal, despite having previously agreed in December to an $83 billion sale to Netflix. Paramount Skydance's latest offer, its ninth since 2025, included a provision granting WBD shareholders an additional $650 million per quarter for any delay in completing the Netflix transaction beyond December 31, 2026. Although the board initially rejected the revised proposal as insufficient, ongoing scrutiny from investors and corporate governance observers prompted further evaluation to demonstrate fulfillment of fiduciary duties. Under the existing agreement,
Netflix retains the right to match any superior competing offer prior to closing, while the proposed transaction is expected to face regulatory review in the United States. On February 18, 2026,
Cinemark Theatres CEO Sean Gamble said exhibitors were cautious about Netflix's pledges to maintain traditional theatrical release windows, citing the company's history and calling for firmer assurances. He described the situation as "active and fluid" as Netflix and Paramount Skydance competed for WBD. Gamble said Cinemark, individually and through the trade group
Cinema United, had remained in contact with the companies and regulators to advocate for sustained exclusive theatrical windows. He added that exhibitors had long believed Netflix would eventually recognize the value of theatrical releases, noting that
Amazon and
Apple had embraced the model. During April and May 2026, more than 5,000 Hollywood actors, directors, producers, writers, editors, composers and costumers signed an open letter opposing the Paramount-WBD merger. On April 13, 2026,
The Anklers chief columnist,
Richard Rushfield was seen carrying a bag of "Block the Merger" buttons at
CinemaCon. Paramount would then pull its advertising budget from
The Ankler and would direct its employees not to engage with
The Ankler as well.
Consumer lawsuits On December 8, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Netflix by an HBO Max subscriber residing in Las Vegas, Michelle Fendelender, who alleges that the proposed Netflix–Warner Bros. acquisition would reduce competition in the U.S.
video on demand market.
Government Congressional and political reactions A group of film industry figures, described as concerned feature film producers, sent an anonymous letter to members of the U.S. Congress urging lawmakers to oppose the proposed acquisition of WBD by Netflix and to apply heightened
antitrust scrutiny. The letter argued that combining WBD's film and television library with Netflix's streaming platform could increase market concentration, reduce competition, and limit creative diversity by consolidating control over content production, distribution, and release strategies within a single company. U.S. Senator
Elizabeth Warren criticized the proposed acquisition of WBD by Netflix, stating that it could raise antitrust concerns related to market concentration. Warren argued that the transaction could reduce competition in the streaming market, potentially resulting in higher prices, fewer consumer choices, and adverse effects on workers in the media industry. She also called for rigorous and transparent enforcement of U.S. antitrust laws during the review process, including by the Department of Justice. U.S. Senator
Mike Lee stated that the proposed acquisition of WBD by Netflix raised antitrust concerns and indicated that congressional oversight of the transaction was likely. Republican Senator
Roger Marshall and U.S. Representative
Darrell Issa also called on federal antitrust authorities to closely review the proposed merger, citing potential effects on theatrical
film distribution. The Netflix proposal raised concerns about potential job losses. U.S. Representative
Laura Friedman stated that continued consolidation in the film and television industry has contributed to employment losses and argued that any merger should be evaluated based on its effects on competition and labor. On March 23, 2026, Democratic senators called for a "full and independent" FCC review of foreign ownership in the Paramount–WBD merger deal.
Trump administration and political influence concerns President Donald Trump stated that the Netflix acquisition could raise concerns due to the size of the combined company's market position and said that he expected to be involved in the regulatory review process. Trump also stated that he had not discussed the competing proposal involving Paramount Skydance with
Jared Kushner, whose firm Affinity Partners was among the external financiers of that bid. Senior Trump administration officials had previously told
CNBC that the administration viewed the Netflix acquisition with "heavy criticism". According to regulatory filings, the financing for the Paramount Skydance proposal included investments from
sovereign wealth funds associated with Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar. The filing stated that these investors, along with Affinity Partners, agreed to forgo governance rights and representation on the board of directors, a structure the company said would place the transaction outside the scope of review by the
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. The same filing reported that
Tencent had withdrawn its financing from the proposal, which Paramount Skydance said was intended to avoid potential CFIUS review. Affinity Partners withdrew its financing on December 16.
The Wall Street Journal reported that after the Netflix deal was publicly announced,
Larry Ellison, the father of Paramount Skydance CEO
David Ellison, called Trump to argue that the deal would hurt competition. Before Paramount Skydance's
hostile takeover bid was announced, it was also reported that David Ellison went to Washington DC and promised Trump administration officials that he would make big changes to
CNN. Trump has stated that he thinks that it is "imperative" that CNN be included in an acquisition "because the people that are running CNN right now are either corrupt or incompetent". CNN is among the various news organizations against which Trump has pursued retaliatory litigation and his administrations have
removed the press credentials of their reporters, and while the Paramount Skydance proposal includes the purchase of CNN, the Netflix proposal does not. In an interview with CNBC on December 8, David Ellison suggested that CNN would be merged with CBS News, which had been included in the Paramount–Skydance merger that was completed on August 7, 2025. When asked in the CNBC interview whether he thought Trump was more supportive of the Paramount Skydance proposal, David Ellison said, "What I would say is I'm incredibly grateful for the relationship that I have with the President, and I also believe he believes in competition." Trump also previously arranged for Larry Ellison to acquire a sizable ownership share of
TikTok as part of the enforcement of the
ban-or-divestment law for foreign adversary controlled social media applications enacted in the United States in 2024. Paramount Skydance submitted required forms with both the FTC and the DOJ on December 8. On January 14, 2026, U.S. Representative
Sam Liccardo, a Democrat from California, called on Paramount Skydance to submit any potential acquisition of WBD to a foreign ownership review, even if such a filing was not legally required. In a letter to David Ellison, Liccardo said that a voluntary review would demonstrate good faith, strengthen public trust, and provide assurances regarding national security, data privacy, and potential foreign influence risks. Ted Sarandos stated that he was unsure why President Donald Trump had shared the
One America News article demanding that Netflix be stopped from purchasing the Studios and Streaming division of WBD, stating "No conversation we ever had was about any of the things that were in that article that he posted. I don't want to overread it, either." On January 11, 2026,
The Guardian reported that Donald Trump had repeatedly called for the sale of CNN in connection with any transaction involving WBD. The article argued that competing acquisition proposals—from Netflix and Paramount Skydance—raised concerns about media consolidation, political influence, and their potential impact on competition and free expression. It noted that lawmakers at a House Judiciary Committee hearing on streaming competition had expressed concerns about consumer harm and political pressure, and stated that neither proposed transaction would serve the public interest. The article cited Netflix's $82.7 billion bid and Paramount Skydance's hostile offer valued at approximately $108 billion, describing both as leading to increased concentration of control over film and television content. On January 16, 2026, British culture minister
Lisa Nandy met Paramount Skydance chief executive David Ellison to discuss issues affecting the UK's film and television sector. It was also reported that, on December 12, 2025, days after Netflix announced its intention to purchase the Studios and Streaming division of WBD, President Trump had purchased corporate
debt security bonds from both WBD, and Netflix, valued at up to $500,000 each. On March 13, Defense Secretary
Pete Hegseth publicly stated that he looked forward to CNN being bought by the Ellisons while criticizing the network due to its coverage of the
2026 Iran war, saying: "The sooner David Ellison takes over that network, the better".
The New York Times reported the remark prompted concerns the network's coverage would be remade in a Trump-friendly direction.
Regulatory review and antitrust oversight (United States) On January 22, 2026, the
U.S. Department of Justice launched an
in-depth antitrust review of Netflix's proposed deal. WBD disclosed in a regulatory filing that both companies had received a formal "second request" for information from the
DOJ's Antitrust Division on January 16, which paused the statutory waiting period and prevented the transaction from closing pending further review. The second request signaled heightened scrutiny of whether the transaction could lessen competition in streaming, film production, or television distribution markets. The review followed Netflix's decision to revise its proposal to an all-cash offer. The transaction remains subject to regulatory approval and a shareholder vote, and both companies said they continued to expect a closing timeline of 12 to 18 months.
Congressional hearings and investigations In February 2026, Netflix co-chief executive officer Ted Sarandos was scheduled to testify before the
United States Senate regarding the company's proposal. The hearing, led by U.S. Senator Mike Lee, was expected to examine the potential effects of the transaction on competition within the streaming entertainment industry. Sarandos and WBD chief strategy officer Bruce Campbell were expected to provide testimony. While the Senate does not directly approve such transactions, the hearing provided lawmakers with an opportunity to seek information on the deal's potential impact on consumers, workers, and competitors. During the same Senate hearing, Netflix co-chief executive officer
Ted Sarandos stated that the company would commit to a 45-day theatrical exhibition window for films produced by WBD following the proposed acquisition. The statement was made in response to questioning regarding the transaction's potential effects on theatrical distribution and the film production ecosystem. Lawmakers from both parties raised concerns regarding the deal's potential impact on competition, labor markets, and content distribution. Senators questioned Sarandos on issues including residual payments, employment conditions in the entertainment industry, and Netflix's market position relative to other platforms. Sarandos stated that residuals were governed by collective bargaining agreements negotiated through the
Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers and cited industry data indicating growth in residual payments in recent years. Senators also examined the competitive relationship between subscription-based streaming services and advertising-supported platforms such as
YouTube. Sarandos argued that viewing patterns increasingly overlapped across platforms and cited the expansion of professionally produced content and long-form programming on YouTube, as well as its growing share of television-based viewing. Members of the
Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust described the proposed acquisition as significant in scale and raised concerns regarding consolidation in the streaming industry. Subcommittee chair
Mike Lee stated that the transaction warranted scrutiny due to its potential effects on competition for creative talent, content distribution, and consumer choice, including risks associated with vertical integration. Senator
Cory Booker expressed concerns about the cultural and market implications of further consolidation in the entertainment industry and said that representatives of competing bidder Netflix had agreed to testify publicly at the hearing. Also testifying was Bruce Campbell, chief revenue and strategy officer of WBD. Netflix executives have stated that they have engaged in discussions with the
U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division,
European Union competition authorities, and state attorneys general regarding the transaction. The proposed acquisition remains subject to regulatory review, and Netflix has characterized the deal as pro-competitive, while regulators and lawmakers continue to assess its potential effects on market concentration and consumer outcomes. Following testimony in February 2026 before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy, and Consumer Rights, lawmakers continued to evaluate Netflix's proposed acquisition of the studio and streaming assets of WBD. During the hearing, Sarandos addressed questions related to market competition, consumer impact, and the company's role in the global entertainment industry. The hearing formed part of the broader legislative and regulatory review process examining whether the transaction would comply with antitrust standards and serve the public interest. Lawmakers did not reach conclusions during the session, and the proposed acquisition remains subject to further regulatory scrutiny. On February 6, 2026, Senator
Adam Schiff and Representative
Laura Friedman sent a letter to Sarandos and Greg Peters, and to David Ellison, requesting detailed commitments regarding the preservation and expansion of film and television jobs in Los Angeles in connection with their respective proposed mergers involving Warner Bros. The lawmakers noted prior public statements by Sarandos and Ellison asserting that their bids for the studio would benefit consumers and strengthen competition. Sarandos had stated that Netflix's proposed merger with Warner Bros. would help create and protect jobs in the entertainment industry. Schiff and Friedman wrote that such statements should be supported by concrete, measurable commitments to California and U.S. workers, emphasizing the importance of maintaining California's role as a center of film and television production. On February 25, 2026, Sarandos scheduled a visit to the White House by February 26 to talk about Netflix's bid.
Axios later reported that after Sarandos arrived in Washington, he did not meet with Trump or any White House officials because the meeting was canceled, and that he instead met only with Justice Department officials. On the same day, Republican attorneys warned the federal government that the Netflix–WBD deal would result in higher prices, lower reliability, and the weakness of American
consumerism. They told them the Paramount–WBD deal would be much better and it will have lower prices, higher reliability, and the stronger consumerism for America's media market.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta tweeted: "the
California Department of Justice has an open investigation, and we intend to be vigorous in our review." ==Shareholder responses==