In most team sports, the home or hosting team is considered to have a significant advantage over the away or visiting team. Due to this, many important games (such as playoff or elimination matches) in many sports have special rules for determining what match is played where. In
association football,
matches with two legs, one game played in each team's "home", are common, with the team hosting the second leg having this home-field advantage. It is also common to hold important games, such as the
Super Bowl, at a neutral site in which the location is determined years in advance. In many team sports in
North America (including
baseball,
basketball, and
ice hockey), playoff series are often held with a nearly equal number of games at each team's site. However, as it is usually beneficial to have an odd number of matches in a series (to prevent ties), the final home game is often awarded to the team that had more success over the regular season. An example is
UEFA Champions League,
UEFA Europa League and
UEFA Europa Conference League home and away legs, with weaker teams often beating the favorites when playing at home. The
World Cup victories of
Uruguay (1930),
Italy (1934),
England (1966),
Germany (1974),
Argentina (1978) and
France (1998) are all in part attributed to the fact that the World Cup was held in the winner's country. A 2006 study by
The Times found that in the
English Premiership, a home team can be expected to score 37.29% more goals than the away team, though this changes depending on the quality of the teams involved. Others have suggested that the increase in British medals during the 2012 Olympics may have been impacted by home court advantage. (However, having home court did not help Canada at the 1976 Montreal Olympics, the only Summer Games at which the hosting country failed to win a single gold medal.) The strength of the home advantage varies for different sports, regions, seasons, and divisions. For all sports, it seems to be strongest in the early period after the creation of a new league. The effect seems to have become somewhat weaker in some sports in recent decades. Richard Adams and Susan Kupper described home-field advantage as an expertise deficiency. They demonstrated that, in theory and in practice, home-field advantage decreases as superiority of performance increases. They also showed that home-field advantage is not applicable for no-hit major league baseball games for pitchers who either replicated performance by winning two or more no-hitters or amassed a large number of career wins. Their general finding was that home-field advantage is a metric for the inability to maintain performance independent of environment and that this metric is inversely related to variables of expertise. In recognition of the difficulty in winning away matches, cup competitions in
association football often invoke the
away goals rule. Away goals can also sometimes be used to separate teams level on points and goal difference in league competitions.
Causes Factors related to the location and the venue There are many causes that attribute to home advantage, such as crowd involvement (for instance a 2024 study on ice hockey results during COVID-19, where no spectators were allowed at matches), travel considerations, and environmental factors. The most commonly cited factors of home advantage are usually factors which are difficult to measure and so even their existence is debated. Most of these are psychological in nature: the home teams are familiar with the playing venue, they can stay in their homes rather than a hotel, they don’t have to travel as far before the game, and they have the psychological support of the home fans. Other factors, however, are easier to detect and can have noticeable effects on the outcome of the game. In
American football, for instance, the crowd often makes as much noise as it can when the visiting team is about to run a play. That can make it very difficult for the visiting team's
quarterback to call
audible play changes, or for any player to hear the
snap count. In contrast, the crowd is often quiet while the home team is on offense, and that enables the quarterback to use the hard count intended to draw the defense
offsides as the defense can hear the hard count. In
basketball, when a visiting player is making a
free throw, home fans behind the
backboard typically wave their arms or other objects in an attempt to break the visiting player's focus on making the shot. Environmental factors such as weather and altitude are easy to measure, yet their effects are debatable. Both teams have to play in the same conditions, but the home team may be more acclimated to local conditions with difficult environments, including extreme temperatures and high altitude (such as the case of
Denver teams, as well as the
Mexico national football team, many of whose home matches are played in
Mexico City). The stadium or arena will typically be filled with home
supporters, who are sometimes described as being as valuable as an extra player for the home team. The home fans can sometimes create a psychological lift by cheering loudly for their team when good things happen in the game. The home crowd can also intimidate visiting players by
booing,
whistling, or
heckling. Generally the home fans vastly outnumber the visiting team's supporters. While some visiting fans may travel to attend the game, home team fans will generally have better access to tickets and easier transport to the event, thus in most cases they outnumber the visitors' fans (although in
local derbies and
crosstown rivalries this may not always be the case). In some sports, such as
association football, sections of the stadium will be reserved for supporters of one team or the other (to prevent fan violence) but the home team's fans will have the bulk of the seating available to them. In addition, stadium/arena
light shows,
sound effects,
fireworks,
cheerleaders, and other means to enliven the crowd will be in support of the home team.
Stadium announcers in many sports will emphasize the home team's goals and lineup to excite the crowd. Ryan Boyko, a research assistant in the Department of Psychology in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences at
Harvard University, studied 5,000
English Premier League games from 1992 to 2006, to discern any officiating bias and the influence of home crowds. The data was published in the
Journal of Sports Sciences and suggested that for every additional 10,000 people attending, home team advantage increased by 0.1 goals. Additionally, his study found that home teams are likely to be awarded more
penalty kicks, and this is more likely with inexperienced
referees. Further, home players can be accustomed to peculiar environmental conditions of their home area. The city of
Denver, being above sea level, has thinner air, enough so that it affects the stamina of athletes whose bodies are not used to it. Although
baseball is less
aerobically demanding than many other sports, high altitude affects that sport's game play in several important ways. Denver's combination of altitude and a
semi-arid climate (the city averages only about 16 in/400 mm precipitation annually) allows
fly balls to travel about 10% farther than at sea level, and also slightly reduces the ability of a
pitcher to throw an effective
breaking ball. The low humidity also causes baseballs to dry out, making it harder for pitchers to grip them and further reducing their ability to throw breaking balls. The
Colorado Rockies have a very large home advantage. This anomaly has been countered with Colorado's innovative use of
humidors to keep the baseballs from drying out. Denver's altitude advantage has also come into play in
gridiron football; the second longest
field goal in
National Football League history took place in Denver, as did the longest recorded
punt. The national
association football team of
Bolivia also enjoys the advantage of playing at high altitude: at home during
World Cup qualifiers at the even more extreme 3,600 m (11,800 ft) altitude of
La Paz they have even been known to beat
Brazil, a team regularly ranked number one in the
FIFA World Rankings. At another game played in Bolivia, Bolivia beat
Argentina, who were ranked sixth in the world, 6–1 on April 1, 2009, Argentina's heaviest defeat since 1958. In
cricket, the condition of the
pitch and the behaviour of the ball when it bounces off the pitch varies significantly in different parts of the world, and consequently the players on the visiting team must adjust to the ball behaving in an unfamiliar way to be successful on foreign surfaces; additionally, the home team has the right to adjust the preparation of its pitches in a manner which specifically enhances its own strengths or exacerbates its opponent's weaknesses. The weather can also play a major factor. For example, the February average temperature minimum in
Tel Aviv,
Israel is , while the average at the same time in
Kazan,
Russia is , with snow being common. This means that when
Rubin Kazan played at home to
Hapoel Tel Aviv in the
2009-10 UEFA Europa League, Hapoel needed to acclimatize and were therefore at a disadvantage. Hapoel duly lost the match 3–0. However, a home stadium subject to frequent inclement weather can be a burden on the home team: the
Buffalo Bills, whose home stadium (
Highmark Stadium) is subject to high and unpredictable winds and
lake-effect snow in the late fall and early winter, regularly suffer large numbers of injuries late in the season and the Bills have had to cancel practice due to the weather. A study, published in the Orthopedic Journal of Sports Medicine and reported by Forbes in 2016, analyzed NFL injury reports from 2012-2014 and found that players had a two-fold greater risk of concussions and a 1.5 times greater risk of ankle injuries in games played at or colder compared to games at or warmer. Sometimes the unique attributes of a stadium create a home-field advantage. The unique off-white
Teflon-coated roof of the
Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome trapped and reflected noise to such an extent that it was distracting or even harmful. This, combined with the color of the roof, caused opposing baseball players to commit more errors in the Dome than in other ballparks. While this is no longer an issue for opponents of the
Minnesota Twins with that team's 2010 move to the open-air
Target Field, it remained important to the many college baseball teams that played games in the Dome until its late 2013 closing.
Hard Rock Stadium, the home stadium of the NFL's
Miami Dolphins, is designed in such a way that when the sun is overhead, the home sideline is in the shade while the visitors sideline is directly in the sun's path. This, combined with the hot tropical climate
South Florida receives, can lead to differences of up to or more between the two sidelines, with the visiting sideline temperature getting as high as 120 °F (49 °C). The
parquet floor at the
Boston Celtics' former home of
Boston Garden contained many defects, which were said to give the Celtics, who were more likely to be familiar with the playing surface, an advantage. During the
1985–1986 season, the
Larry Bird-led Celtics posted a home court record of 40–1; this record (since tied by the
2015-2016 San Antonio Spurs) still stands in the
NBA.
Memorial Gymnasium, the venue for
men's and
women's basketball at
Vanderbilt University, was built in 1952 with the team benches at the ends of the court instead of along one of the sidelines, a setup that was not unusual at the time. However, the configuration is now unique in U.S. major-college sports, and has been said to give the Commodores an edge because opposing coaches are not used to directing their teams from the baseline.
Cherry Hill Arena, a
New Jersey–based arena in the southern suburbs of
Philadelphia, had a number of idiosyncrasies that its home teams used to their advantage but earned the arena an extremely poor reputation, including a slanted ice surface that forced opponents to skate the majority of the game uphill and lack of showers for the visiting team.
Sports Illustrated, in a 17 January 2011 article, reported that home crowds, rigor of travel for visiting teams, scheduling, and unique home field characteristics,
were not factors in giving home teams an advantage. The journal concluded that it was favorable treatment by game officials and referees that conferred advantages on home teams. They stated that sports officials are unwittingly and psychologically influenced by home crowds and the influence is significant enough to affect the outcomes of sporting events in favor of the home team. Other research has found that crowd support, travel fatigue, geographical distance, pitch familiarity, and referee bias do not have a strong effect when each factor is considered alone suggesting that it is the combination of several different factors that creates the overall home advantage effect. An
evolutionary psychology explanation for the home advantage effect refers to observed behavioral and physiological responses in animals when they are defending their
home territory against intruders. This causes a rise in aggression and
testosterone levels in the defenders. A similar effect has been observed in football with testosterone levels being significantly higher in home games than in away games. Goalkeepers, the last line of defense, have particularly strong testosterone changes when playing against a bitter rival as compared to a training season. How testosterone may influence results is unclear but may include cognitive effects such as motivation and physiological effects such as reaction time. The 2020–21 NHL season saw major disruption due to COVID-19-restricted conditions that resulted in bubble playoffs and ghost games, as fans were unable to attend in person. New research has shown that this led to a significant drop to home advantage compared with the previous six seasons. In 592 games played under the restricted conditions through March, home teams suffered a decline of 10% while road teams’ win rates increased by 7%.
Factors related to the game rules In a number of sports, the hosting team has the advantage of playing with their first choice uniforms, while the visiting team wears their alternative
away/road colors. Some sports leagues simply state that the team wears its away uniforms only when its primary jerseys would clash with the colors of the home team, while other leagues mandate that visiting teams must always wear their away colors regardless. However, sometimes teams wear their alternative uniforms by choice. This is especially true in North American sports where generally one uniform is white or grey, and "color vs. color" games (e.g., blue vs. red uniforms) are a rarity, having been discouraged in the era of
black-and-white television. Many teams from warm-weather cities may wear their white uniforms at home, forcing their opponent to wear dark uniforms in the hot weather. An exception is a rule in
high school American football (except Texas, which plays by
NCAA football rules), requiring the home team to wear dark jerseys and the visiting team to wear white jerseys, which may work as a disadvantage to the home team in hot-weather games. In
ice hockey, there are at least three distinct rule-related advantages for the home team. The first is referred to as "last change", where during stoppages of play, the home team is allowed to make player substitutions after the visiting team does (unless the home team ices the puck, in which case no substitutions are allowed). This allows the home team to obtain favorable player matchups. This rule makes the home team designation important even in games played on neutral ice. Traditionally, the second advantage was that when lining up for the
face-off, the away team's centre always had to place his stick on the ice before the centre of the home team. However, in both the NHL and international rule sets, this now applies only for face-offs at the centre-ice spot; when a face-off takes place anywhere else on the ice, the defending centre has to place his stick first. The centre who is allowed to place his stick last gains the ability to time the face-off better and gives him greater odds of winning it. The third advantage is that the home team has the benefit of choosing whether to take the first or second attempt in a shootout. In baseball, the home team – which bats in the bottom half of each inning – enjoys the advantage of being able to end the game immediately if it has the lead in the ninth inning (or other scheduled final inning) or in
extra innings. If the home team is leading at the end of the top half of the ninth inning, the game ends without the bottom half being played. If the home team is trailing or the score is tied in the bottom half of the ninth inning or any extra inning, the game ends immediately if the home team takes the lead; the visiting team does not get another opportunity to score and the home team does not have to protect their lead. On the other hand, if the visiting team has the lead when the top half of the ninth inning or extra inning ends, the home team still gets an opportunity to score and so the visiting team must protect their lead. In addition, in the late innings, the home team knows how many runs they need to win or tie, and can therefore strategize accordingly. For example, in a tie game in the ninth inning or extra innings, the home team may employ strategies such as
bunting or
stealing bases, which oftentimes increase the chance of scoring one run, but decrease the chance of scoring multiple runs. Additionally in baseball, the host team is familiar with the unique dimensions of their home field yielding them advantages (pitching, hitting, fielding) over visiting teams. Before the
Major League Baseball labor agreement that ended the
2021–22 lockout saw the
designated hitter added permanently in the National League, the home league's rules concerning the
designated hitter (DH) were followed during
interleague games, including the
World Series. This put AL teams at a disadvantage when they played in NL parks, as AL pitchers were typically not used to batting nor baserunning. NL teams at AL parks were at a disadvantage because a player who did not play often had to bat an entire game, usually on consecutive nights. The NL team's DH was a
pinch-hitter who batted perhaps once every two or three games during the season, or alternated in a platoon system with other players (such as a catcher who does not start because the starting pitcher uses the other catcher), while the AL team's DH batted three or more times a game throughout the season.
Measuring and comparing of home-field advantage Measuring the home-field advantage of a team (in a league with balanced schedule) requires a determination of the number of opponents for which the result at home-field was better (k_1), same (k_0), and worse (k_{-1}). Goals scored and conceded – in so called
combined measure of home team advantage – are used to determine which results are better, same, and which are worse. Given two results between teams T_1 and T_2, h_{T_1}:a_{T_2} played at T_1's field and h_{T_2}:a_{T_1}played at T_2's field, we can compute differences in scores (e.g. from T_1's point of view): d_{h,T_1}=h_{T_1}-a_{T_2}and d_{a,T_1}=a_{T_1}-h_{T_2}. Team T_1 played better at home field if d_{h,T_1}>d_{a,T_1}, and T_1 played better at away field if d_{h,T_1} (for example, if Arsenal won 3–1 at home against Chelsea, i.e. d_{h,Arsenal}=2, and Arsenal won 3–0 at Chelsea, i.e. d_{a,Arsenal}=3, then the result for Arsenal at home was worse). Same approach has to be used for all opponents in one season to obtain k_1, k_0, and k_{-1}. Values of k_1, k_0, and k_{-1} are used to estimate probabilities as \hat{p}_r=\frac{k_r+1}{K+3}, r=-1,0,1, where K is total number of opponents in a league (this is
Bayesian estimator). To test hypothesis that home-field advantage is
statistically significant we can compute P(p_1>p_{-1})=1-I_{1/2}(k_1+1,k_{-1}+1), where I_{1/2}() is
incomplete gamma function. For example, Newcastle in
2015/2016 English Premier League season recorded better result at home field for 13 opponents, same result with 4 opponents, and worse result for two opponents; therefore P(p_1>p_{-1})=1-I_{1/2}(14,3)=0.998 and hypothesis about home team advantage can be accepted. This procedure was introduced and applied by Marek and Vávra (2017) on English Premier League seasons 1992/1993 – 2015/2016. Later, the procedure was finalised in Marek and Vávra (2020). Marek and Vávra (2018) described procedure which allows to use observed counts of combined measure of home team advantage (k_1, k_0, and k_{-1}) in two leagues to be compared by the
test for homogeneity of parallel samples (for the test see Rao (2002)). The second proposed approach is based on distance between estimated probability description of home team advantage in two leagues ( \hat{p}_r=\frac{k_r}{K}, r=-1,0,1) which can be measured by Jeffrey divergence (a symmetric version of
Kullback–Leibler divergence). They tested five top level English football leagues and two top level Spanish leagues between 2007/2008 and 2016/2017 season. The main result is that home team advantage in Spain is stronger. Spanish
La Liga has the strongest home team advantage, and
English football league two has the lowest home team advantage, among analysed leagues. Comparison of home advantage in 19 European football leagues between the 2007/2008 and 2016/2017 seasons was made in Marek and Vávra (2024). They found that, among the analysed leagues, the
Super League Greece had the strongest home advantage and
English Football League Two had the lowest home advantage. ==Gaining or losing home-field advantage==