Foreign policy Foreign policy was one of the central subjects of the columns for which Stephens won the
Pulitzer Prize for Commentary. Critics have characterized his foreign policy opinions as
neoconservative, part of a conservative political movement associated with President
George W. Bush that advocates the use of military force abroad, particularly in the Middle East, as a way of promoting democracy there. Stephens was a "prominent voice" among the media advocates for the start of the 2003
Iraq War, for instance writing in a 2002 column that, unless checked, Iraq was likely to become the first nuclear power in the Arab world. Although the
weapons of mass destruction used as a
casus belli were never shown to exist, Stephens continued to insist as late as 2013 that the Bush administration had "solid evidence" for going to war. He also argued strongly against the
Iran nuclear deal and its preliminary agreements, claiming that they are a worse bargain even than the 1938
Munich Agreement with
Nazi Germany.
Israel Stephens is a supporter of Israel and considers himself a
Zionist. He said that one of the reasons he left
The Wall Street Journal for
The Jerusalem Post was that he believed that Western media was getting Israel's story wrong. Stephens has supported
Israel during the
Gaza war and strongly opposed the
Houthis,
Hezbollah, and
Hamas. He has criticized such groups for their violent actions towards Israel and has blamed Hamas for the ongoing conflict.
Richard Falk called this piece "so extreme, in my view, as to make it unpublishable in a responsible media platform" and stated that calling "recourse to the preeminent judicial body with a conservative legal tradition 'a moral obscenity' is itself 'a moral obscenity. Stephens opposes the characterization of the war as
genocide, stating that there is "no evidence of an Israeli plan to deliberately target and kill Gazan civilians."
Global warming Stephens is also known for his climate change
contrarianism. He has been described as a
climate change denier, but disavows that term, calling himself agnostic on the issue. Stephens considers climate change a "20-year-old
mass hysteria phenomenon" and rejects the notion that
greenhouse-gas emissions are an environmental threat. According to him, "it isn't science" and belongs in the "realm of belief" as it is a "sick-souled religion". He also mocks
climate change activism as hysterical
alarmism, denying that any significant temperature change will occur in the next 100 years and arguing that it distracts from more important issues, such as
terrorism. Stephens claims that global warming activism is based on theological beliefs, rather than science, as an outgrowth of Western tendencies to expect punishment for
sins. Stephens has suggested that activists would be more persuasive if they were less sure of their beliefs. Stephens's positions on this issue led to a protest in 2013 over his Pulitzer
citation omitting his climate change columns, and to a strong backlash against his 2017 hiring by
The New York Times. In reaction,
The New York Times praised Stephens's "intellectual honesty and fairness". As of October 28, 2022, Stephens said that he had come to accept the reality of anthropogenic climate change after a trip to Greenland with climate scientist
John Englander, although he believes that markets are more effective than government at addressing the problem.
Gun rights Stephens disagrees with the mainstream conservative support for the
Second Amendment and has called for its repeal, but he does not support a ban on gun ownership.
Donald Trump During the
2016 United States presidential election campaign, Stephens became part of the
Stop Trump movement, regularly writing articles for
The Wall Street Journal opposing
Donald Trump's candidacy, and becoming "one of Trump's most outspoken conservative critics", according to Sam Reisman of
Mediaite. Stephens has compared Trump to Italian dictator
Benito Mussolini. After the
2024 United States presidential election, Stephens published an opinion article in
The New York Times acknowledging his past criticisms and reservations about Trump but concluding, "So here's a thought for Trump's perennial critics, including those of us on the right: Let's enter the new year by wishing the new administration well, by giving some of Trump's cabinet picks the benefit of the doubt, by dropping the lurid historical comparisons to past dictators, by not sounding paranoid about the ever-looming end of democracy, by hoping for the best and knowing that we need to fight the wrongs that are real and not merely what we fear, that whatever happens, this too shall pass." ==Published works==