Standard German phonology

s of standard German, from |class=skin-invert-image Monophthongs Some scholars treat as an unstressed allophone of . Likewise, some scholars • is close near-front rounded . It occurs only in unstressed syllables, for instance in ('occupy'). It is often considered a complementary allophone together with , which only rarely or regionally occurs in unstressed syllables (e.g. ). If a sonorant follows in the syllable coda, the schwa often disappears so that the sonorant becomes syllabic, for instance ('pillow'), ('donkey'). However, Standard German spoken in Luxembourg often lacks syllabic sonorants under the influence of Luxembourgish, so that e.g. ('put') is pronounced , rather than . • has been variously described as mid near-front unrounded It is a common allophone of the sequence common to all German-speaking areas but Switzerland. As schwa /ə/ is never pronounced here, it is also possible to interpret as the vocalic allophone of the syllabic sonorant /r̩/. • has been variously described as open front unrounded and open central unrounded . Some scholars differentiate two short , namely front and back . The latter occurs only in unstressed open syllables, exactly as . • Standard Austrian pronunciation of this vowel is back . • Front or even is a common realization of in northern German varieties influenced by Low German. • has been variously described as open central unrounded Because of this, it is sometimes transcribed . • Back is the Standard Austrian pronunciation. He also says that "outside of a word context, cannot be distinguished from . Northern German varieties influenced by Low German could be analyzed as lacking contrasting vowel quantity entirely: • has a different quality than (see above). • These varieties also consistently lack , and use only in its place. Phonemic status of The existence of a phoneme in German is disputed. The distinction between the long lax and the long tense does not exist in some varieties of Standard German, and many authors treat the phoneme as peripheral and regard a distinction between it and as a spelling pronunciation. Most commonly, they are merged before an intervocalic , so that potential minimal pairs such as 'ear of grain' and 'honor' or 'bears' and 'berries' are rendered homophonous, as and . Some authors claim that no distinction between and is possible in this position unless in hypercorrect pronunciation, in which and may be pronounced and , with a tense . Other authors claim that there is regional variation, a distinction occurring especially in southern varieties of Standard German. In contexts other than before intervocalic , the contrast between and is more stable, so that 'bid, conjunctive', 'Danes' and ('saws, n.') may be differentiated from 'to pray', 'to stretch' and 'blessing'. Even here the vowels can merge, but to a tense : . Scholars who question the existence of a phoneme do so for the following reasons: • The existence of a phoneme is an irregularity in a vowel system that otherwise has pairs of long and tense vs. short and lax vowels such as vs. . On the other hand, such irregularities are not ruled out by any principle. • The phoneme has developed out of the spelling of the language rather than from any historical sound change. Most examples of Middle High German /ǣ/ correspond to New High German rather than , indicating that the modern is not a regular development. • Although some dialects (e.g. Ripuarian and some Alemannic dialects) have an opposition of vs. , their usage does not follow that of the standard. There is also little agreement across dialects as to whether individual lexical items should be pronounced with or with . E.g. South Hessian dialects have in Käse but in Leben. • The use of is a spelling pronunciation rather than an original feature of the language. It is an attempt to "speak as printed" () and to differentiate the spellings and (i.e. speakers attempt to justify the appearance of and in writing by making them distinct in the spoken language). Diphthongs Phonemic s of standard German, from • has been variously described as , and . • has been variously described as , • has been variously described as , • is found only in a handful of interjections such as and , and as an alternative to disyllabic in words such as . Phonetic The following usually are not counted among the German diphthongs as German speakers often feel they are distinct marks of "foreign words" (). These appear only in loanwords: • , as in , colloquially: . • Many German speakers use and as adaptations of the English diphthongs and in English loanwords, according to , or they replace them with the native German long vowels and . Thus, the word may be pronounced or . However, and do not recognize these diphthongs as phonemes, and prescribe pronunciations with the long vowels and instead. In the varieties where speakers vocalize to in the syllable coda, a diphthong ending in may be formed with every stressable vowel: : notes that the length contrast is not very stable before non-prevocalic and that ", following the pronouncing dictionaries (, ) judge the vowel in , , to be long, while the vowel in , , is supposed to be short. The factual basis of this presumed distinction seems very questionable." He goes on stating that in his own dialect, there is no length difference in these words, and that judgements on vowel length in front of non-prevocalic which is itself vocalized are problematic, in particular if precedes. (the corresponding Standard Northern pronunciation is ). Another feature of the Standard Austrian accent is complete absorption of by the preceding , so that e.g. 'scarce' is pronounced . :At the end of words only. ==Consonants==

With around 22 to 26 phonemes, the German consonant system has an average number of consonants in comparison with other languages. One of the more noteworthy ones is the unusual affricate . • can be uvular, alveolar or even dental, a consonant or a semivowel, see below. • is bilabial–labiodental , rather than purely labiodental . • are voiceless in Austrian Standard German and in most other South German varieties. • can be apical alveolar , laminal alveolar or laminal denti-alveolar . The other possible pronunciation of that has been reported to occur in unstressed intervocalic positions is retroflex . Austrian German often uses laminal denti-alveolar articulation. • is always clear, as in most Irish English accents. A few Austrian accents may use a velarized instead, but that is considered non-standard. • In the Standard Austrian variety, may be affricated to before front vowels. laminal post-dental Austrian German often uses the post-dental articulation for . • are strongly labialized palato-alveolar sibilants . are fricated more weakly than . There are two variants of these sounds: • Laminal, either alveolar (articulated with the tip of the tongue against the alveolar ridge), • Voiced uvular trill , which can be realized as voiceless after voiceless consonants (as in ). • Distribution: Occurs in some conservative varieties—most speakers with a uvular realize it as a fricative or an approximant. It is also one of possible realizations of in the Standard Austrian accent, but it is less common than a fricative . • describe it as a voiced post-velar fricative . • and describe it as a voiced uvular fricative ; • states that "with educated professional radio and TV announcers, as with professional actors on the stage and in film, the [voiced uvular] fricative [realization of] clearly predominates." • describe it as a uvular fricative or approximant . The latter is less likely to occur word-initially. • Distribution: Almost all areas apart from Bavaria and parts of Switzerland. • Near-open central unrounded vowel is a post-vocalic allophone of (mostly dorsal) varieties of . The non-syllabic variant of it is not always near-open or central; it is similar to either or , depending on the environment. and the Higher Lusatia. • The voiceless stops , , are aspirated except when preceded by a sibilant. Many southern dialects do not aspirate , and some northern ones do so only in a stressed position. The voiceless affricates , , and are never aspirated, and neither are any other consonants besides the aforementioned . • Before and after front vowels ( and, in varieties that realize them as front, and/or ), the velar consonants are realized as post-palatal . According to , in a parallel process, before and after back vowels ( and, in varieties that realize them as back, and/or ) are retracted to post-velar or even uvular . • a fricative which can be fricated less strongly than , • a sound variable between a weak fricative and an approximant, and • an approximant , which is the usual realization in the Standard Austrian variety. accept none, some accept all but , and some accept all. • Although occurs in native words, it only appears in historic clusters of + (e.g. deutsch '''''' is the voiceless palatal fricative (which is found in the word 'I'), and '''''' is the voiceless velar fricative (which is found in the word the interjection 'oh', 'alas'). is the German word for 'sound, phone'. In German, these two sounds are allophones occurring in complementary distribution. The allophone occurs after back vowels and (for instance in 'book'), the allophone after front vowels (for instance in 'me/myself') and consonants (for instance in 'fear', 'sometimes'). The allophone also appears after vocalized in superregional variants, e.g. in 'fear'. In southeastern regiolects, the is commonly used here, yielding . In loanwords, the pronunciation of potential fricatives in onsets of stressed syllables varies: in the Northern varieties of standard German, it is , while in Southern varieties, it is , and in Western varieties, it is (for instance in : vs. vs. ). The diminutive suffix is always pronounced with an . Usually, this ending triggers umlaut (compare for instance 'dog' to 'little dog'), so theoretically, it could only occur after front vowels. However, in some comparatively recent coinings, there is no longer an umlaut, for instance in the word (a diminutive of 'woman'), so that a back vowel is followed by a , even though normally it would be followed by a , as in ('to smoke'). This exception to the allophonic distribution may be an effect of the morphemic boundary or an example of phonemicization, where erstwhile allophones undergo a split into separate phonemes. The allophonic distribution of after front vowels and after other vowels is also found in other languages, such as Scots, e.g. licht 'light', dochter 'daughter', and the same distribution is reconstructed for Middle English. However, it is by no means inevitable: Dutch, Yiddish, and many Upper German dialects retain (which can be realized as instead) in all positions. It is thus reasonable to assume that Old High German ih, the ancestor of modern , was pronounced with rather than . While it is impossible to know for certain whether Old English words such as niht (modern night) were pronounced with or , is likely (see Old English phonology). Despite the phonetic history, the complementary distribution of and in modern Standard German is better described as backing of after a back vowel, rather than fronting of after a front vowel, because is used in onsets ( 'chemistry') and after consonants ( 'newt'), and is thus the underlying form of the phoneme. According to Kohler, the German is further differentiated into two allophones, and : occurs after (for instance in 'book') and after (for instance in 'brook'), while either or may occur after , with predominating. In Western varieties, there is a strong tendency to realize as unrounded or , and the phoneme may be confused or merged with altogether, secondarily leading to hypercorrection effects where is replaced with , for instance in , which may be realized as . Within German dialects, a large variation exists as to the environments which trigger or prevent one realization or the other. Fortis–lenis pairs Various German consonants occur in pairs at the same place of articulation and in the same manner of articulation, namely the pairs , , , , . These pairs are often called fortis–lenis pairs, since describing them as voiced–voiceless pairs is inadequate. With certain qualifications, , and are also considered fortis–lenis pairs. Fortis-lenis distinction for is unimportant. The fortis stops are aspirated in many varieties. The aspiration is strongest in the onset of a stressed syllable (such as 'thaler'), weaker in the onset of an unstressed syllable (such as 'father'), and weakest in the syllable coda (such as in 'seed'). All fortis consonants, i.e. The lenis consonants Due to this variability, there are disagreements about the phonological nature of the contrast: while some phonologists analyse the lenes stops as underlyingly voiced, others consider the relevant feature to be tenseness or spreading of the glottis (with the fortis stops being tense or articulated with spread glottis. are voiceless in most southern varieties of German. For clarity, they are often transcribed as . The nature of the phonetic difference between the voiceless lenis consonants and the similarly voiceless fortis consonants is controversial. It is generally described as a difference in articulatory force, and occasionally as a difference in articulatory length; for the most part, it is assumed that one of these characteristics implies the other. In various central and southern varieties, the opposition between fortis and lenis is neutralized in the syllable onset; sometimes just in the onset of stressed syllables, sometimes in all cases. The pair is not considered a fortis–lenis pair, but a simple voiceless–voiced pair, as remains voiced in all varieties, including the Southern varieties that devoice the lenes (with however some exceptions). Generally, the southern is realized as the voiced approximant . However, there are southern varieties which differentiate between a fortis (such as in 'culpable' from Middle High German stræflich) and a lenis (, such as in 'polite' from Middle High German hovelîch); this is analogous to the opposition of fortis () and lenis . Coda devoicing In varieties from Northern Germany, lenis stops in the syllable coda are realized as fortis stops. This does not happen in varieties from Southern Germany, Austria or Switzerland. Phonologists who believe that the relevant feature behind the fortes-lenes contrast is not phonetic voice have also argued that this cannot be called devoicing in the strict sense of the word because it does not involve the loss of voice. In their view, it can be called coda fortition or a neutralization of fortis and lenis sounds in the coda. Fricatives, on the other hand, are acknowledged to be truly and contrastively voiced in Northern Germany, so they can be said to undergo coda devoicing according to this account as well. ==Stress==

In German words there is always one syllable carrying main stress, with all other syllables either being unstressed or carrying a secondary stress. The position of the main stress syllable has been a matter of debate. Traditionally, word stress is seen as falling onto the first stem syllable. In recent analyses, there is agreement that main stress is placed onto one of the last three (stressable) syllables. Within this three-syllable window, word stress is put regularly onto the second-to-last syllable, the penultimate syllable. However, syllable quantity may modify this pattern: a heavy final or prefinal syllable, i.e., one with a long vowel or with one or more consonants in the syllable coda, will usually attract main stress. ;Examples: • final stress: Eleˈfant, Krokoˈdil, Kaˈmel • penultimate stress: ˈTurban, ˈKonsul, ˈBison • antepenultimate stress: ˈPinguin, ˈRisiko, ˈMonitor A set of illustrative examples also stems from Japanese loan words, as these cannot be borrowed with their stress patterns (Japanese has a system of pitch accents, completely different from word stress in Germanic languages): • final stress: Shoˈgun, Samuˈrai • penultimate stress: Mitsuˈbishi, Ikeˈbana • antepenultimate stress: Hiˈroshima, ˈOsaka A list of Japanese words in German reveals that none of the words with four syllables has initial stress, confirming the three-syllable-window analysis. Secondary stresses precede the main stress if at least two syllables are present, as in ''̩Bib-li- ̩o-the-'ka-rin''. Suffixes, if containing a stressable vowel, are either stressed (-ei, ion, -al, etc.) or unstressed (-ung, -heit, -isch, etc.) In addition, German uses different stresses for separable prefixes and inseparable prefixes in verbs and words derived from such verbs: • Words beginning with , , , , , , and a few other inseparable prefixes are stressed on the root. • Words beginning with the separable prefixes , , , , and most prepositional adverbs are stressed on the prefix. • Some prefixes, notably , , , and , can function as separable or inseparable prefixes and are stressed or not accordingly. • A few homographs with such prefixes exist. They are not perfect homophones. Consider the word . As (separable prefix), it means 'to rewrite' and is pronounced , with stress on the first syllable. Its associated noun, is also stressed on the first syllable – . On the other hand, (inseparable prefix) is pronounced , with stress on the second syllable. This word means 'to paraphrase', and its associated noun, is also stressed on the second syllable – . Another example is the word ; with stress on the root () it means 'to drive around (an obstacle in the street)', and with stress on the prefix () it means 'to run down/over' or 'to knock down'. ==Acquisition==

General Like all infants, German infants go through a babbling stage in the early phases of phonological acquisition, during which they produce the sounds they will later use in their first words. Phoneme inventories begin with stops, nasals, and vowels; (contrasting) short vowels and liquids appear next, followed by fricatives and affricates, and finally all other consonants and consonant clusters. Children begin to produce protowords near the end of their first year. These words do not approximate adult forms, yet have a specific and consistent meaning. The first vowels produced are , , and , followed by , , and , with rounded vowels emerging last. One case study found that a 17-month-old child acquiring German replaced the voiceless velar fricative with the nearest available continuant , or deleted it altogether ( 'book' pronounced or ). Prosodically, children prefer bisyllabic words with the pattern strong – weak over monosyllabic words. Vowel space development In 2009, Lintfert examined the development of vowel space of German speakers in their first three years of life. During the babbling stage, vowel distribution has no clear pattern. However, stressed and unstressed vowels already show different distributions in the vowel space. Once word production begins, stressed vowels expand in the vowel space, while the F1 – F2 vowel space of unstressed vowels becomes more centralized. The majority of infants are then capable of stable production of F1. The variability of formant frequencies among individuals decreases with age. After 24 months, infants expand their vowel space individually at different rates. However, if the parents' utterances possess a well-defined vowel space, their children produce clearly distinguished vowel classes earlier. By about three years old, children command the production of all vowels, and they attempt to produce the four cardinal vowels, , , and , at the extreme limits of the F1–F2 vowel space (i.e., the height and backness of the vowels are made extreme by the infants). Nasals The acquisition of nasals in German differs from that of Dutch, a phonologically closely related language. German children produce proportionately more nasals in onset position (sounds before a vowel in a syllable) than Dutch children do. German children, once they reached 16 months, also produced significantly more nasals in syllables containing schwas, when compared with Dutch-speaking children. This may reflect differences in the languages the children are being exposed to, although the researchers claim that the development of nasals likely cannot be seen apart from the more general phonological system the child is developing. Phonotactic constraints and reading A 2006 study examined the acquisition of German in phonologically delayed children (specifically, issues with fronting of velars and stopping of fricatives) and whether they applied phonotactic constraints to word-initial consonant clusters containing these modified consonants. In many cases, the subjects (mean age = 5.1) avoided making phonotactic violations, opting instead for other consonants or clusters in their speech. This suggests that phonotactic constraints do apply to the speech of German children with phonological delay, at least in the case of word-initial consonant clusters. Additional research has also shown that spelling consistencies seen in German raise children's phonemic awareness as they acquire reading skills. ==Sound changes==

Sound changes and mergers A common merger is that of at the end of a syllable with or , for instance ('war'), but ('wars'); ('he lay'), but ('we lay'). This pronunciation is frequent all over central and northern Germany. It is characteristic of regional languages and dialects, particularly Low German in the North, where represents a fricative, becoming voiceless in the syllable coda, as is common in German (final-obstruent devoicing). However common it is, this pronunciation is considered sub-standard. Only in one case, in the grammatical ending (which corresponds to English -y), the fricative pronunciation of final is prescribed by the Siebs standard, for instance ('important'), ('importance'). The merger occurs neither in Austro-Bavarian and Alemannic German nor in the corresponding varieties of Standard German, and therefore in these regions is pronounced . Many speakers do not distinguish the affricate from the simple fricative in the beginning of a word, in which case the verb ('(he) travels') and the noun ('horse') are both pronounced . This most commonly occurs in northern and western Germany, where the local dialects did not originally have the sound . Some speakers also have peculiar pronunciation for in the middle or end of a word, replacing the in with a voiceless bilabial fricative, i.e. a consonant produced by pressing air flow through the tensed lips. Thereby ('drop') becomes , rather than . Many speakers who have a vocalization of after merge this combination with long (i.e. > or > or ). Hereby, ('sheep') and ('sharp') can both be pronounced or . This merger does not occur where is a front vowel while is realised as a back vowel. Here the words are kept distinct as ('sheep') and ('sharp'). Another tactic is the merger of with as , producing a monophthong distinct from (). Such speakers too keep distinct from , but with reverse qualities. Especially the last type of distinction is difficult to perceive to speakers who do not have it in their own speech and can still sound like a merger (both and are very common realizations of the plain ). In umlaut forms, the difference usually reoccurs: or vs. . Speakers with this merger also often use (instead of formally normal ) where it stems from original . The word ('arks') is thus pronounced , which makes a minimal pair with , arguably making the difference between and phonemic, rather than just allophonic, for these speakers. Again, the difference could still be found in vowel quality: vs. , or vs. . In the standard pronunciation, the vowel qualities , , , , as well as , , , , are all still distinguished even in unstressed syllables. In this latter case, however, many simplify the system in various degrees. For some speakers, this may go so far as to merge all four into one, hence misspellings by schoolchildren such as (instead of ) or (instead of Portugal). In everyday speech, more mergers occur, some of which are universal and some of which are typical for certain regions or dialect backgrounds. Overall, there is a strong tendency of reduction and contraction. For example, long vowels may be shortened, consonant clusters may be simplified, word-final may be dropped in some cases, and the suffix may be contracted with preceding consonants, e.g. for ('to have'). If the clusters , , , or are followed by another consonant, the stops , and usually lose their phonemic status. Thus while the standard pronunciation distinguishes ('whole') from ('goose'), as well as from , the two pairs are homophones for most speakers. The commonest practice is to drop the stop (thus , for both words), but some speakers insert the stop where it is not etymological (, for both words), or they alternate between the two ways. Only a few speakers retain a phonemic distinction. Middle High German The Middle High German vowels and developed into the modern Standard German diphthong , whereas and developed into . For example, Middle High German and ('hot' and 'white') became Standard German and . In some dialects, the Middle High German vowels have not changed, e.g. Swiss German and , while in other dialects or languages, the vowels have changed but the distinction is kept, e.g. Bavarian and , Ripuarian and (however the Colognian dialect has kept the original [ei] diphthong in ), Yiddish ' and ' . The Middle High German diphthongs , and became the modern Standard German long vowels , and after the Middle High German long vowels changed to diphthongs. Most Upper German dialects retain the diphthongs. A remnant of their former diphthong character is shown when continues to be written in German (as in 'love'). ==Loanwords==

German incorporates a significant number of loanwords from other languages. Loanwords are often adapted to German phonology but to varying degrees, depending on the speaker and the commonness of the word. and do not occur in native German words but are common in a number of French and English loan words. Many speakers replace them with and respectively (especially in Southern Germany, Austria and Switzerland), so that (from English jungle) can be pronounced or . Some speakers in Northern and Western Germany merge with , so that (phonemically ) can be pronounced , or . The realization of as , however, is uncommon. Loanwords from English Many English words are used in German, especially in technology and pop culture. Some speakers pronounce them similarly to their native pronunciation, but many speakers change non-native phonemes to similar German phonemes (even if they pronounce them in a rather English manner in an English-language setting): • English are usually pronounced as in RP or General American; some speakers replace them with and respectively (th-alveolarization) e.g. . • English can be pronounced the same as in English, i.e. , or as the corresponding native German e.g. or . German and Austrian speakers tend to be variably rhotic when using English loanwords. • English is often replaced with German e.g. . • word-initial is often retained (especially in the South, where word-initial is common), but many speakers replace it with e.g. . • word-initial and are usually retained, but some speakers (especially in South Western Germany and Western Austria) replace them with and e.g. or , or . • English is usually retained, but in Northern and Western Germany as well as Luxembourg, it is often replaced with e.g. . • In Northern Standard German, final-obstruent devoicing is applied to English loan words just as to other words e.g. , or , . However, in Southern Standard German, in Swiss Standard German and Austrian Standard German, final-obstruent devoicing does not occur and so speakers are more likely to retain the original pronunciation of word-final lenes (although realizing them as fortes may occur because of confusing English spelling with pronunciation). • English and are often replaced with and respectively e.g. . • English and are pronounced the same, as German (met–mat merger) e.g. . • English and are pronounced the same, as German (cot–caught merger) e.g. . • English is usually pronounced as German e.g. . • English is usually pronounced as German e.g. or . • English is pronounced as (happy-tensing) e.g. . Loanwords from French French loanwords, once very numerous, have in part been replaced by native German coinages or more recently English loanwords. Besides , they can also contain the characteristic nasal vowels , , and (always long). However, their status as phonemes is questionable and they are often resolved into sequences either of (short) oral vowel and (in the north), or of (long or short) oral vowel and or sometimes (in the south). For example, ('balloon') may be realized as or , ('perfume') as or and ('orange') as or . ==Sample==

The sample text is a reading of "The North Wind and the Sun". The phonemic transcription treats every instance of and as and , respectively. The phonetic transcription is a fairly narrow transcription of the educated northern accent. The speaker transcribed in the narrow transcription is 62 years old, and he is reading in a colloquial style. Orthographic version ==See also==